Phase Transitions in Nonequilibrium Traffic Theory
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 126, Issue 1
Abstract
This paper uses the center difference scheme of Lax-Friedrichs to numerically solve a newly developed continuum traffic flow theory and the kinematic theory of Lighthill and Whitham, and Richards, and it studies the flow-concentration phase transitions in flow containing both shock and rarefaction waves. A homogeneous road with finite length was modeled by both theories. Numerical simulations show that both theories yield nearly identical results for two representative Riemann problems—one has a shock solution and the other a rarefaction wave solution. Their phase transition curves, however, are different: those derived from the new theory have two branches—one for acceleration flow and one for deceleration flow, whereas those derived from the LWR theory comprise a single curve—the equilibrium curve. The phase transition curves in the shock case agree well with certain experimental observations but disagree with others. This disagreement may be resolved by studying transitions among nonequilibrium states, which awaits further development of a more accurate finite difference approximation of the nonequilibrium theory.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Cassidy, M. J. ( 1996). “Unique bivariate relationships in highway traffic.” Preprint, No. 960100, Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C.
2.
Daganzo, C. (1995). “Requiem for second-order approximations of traffic flow.” Transp. Res., 29B(4), 277–286.
3.
Del Castillo, J. M., and Benitez, F. G. (1995). “On functional form of the speed-density relationship—I: General theory; II: Empirical investigation.” Transp. Res., 29B, 373–406.
4.
Greenshields, B. D. ( 1934). “A study of traffic capacity.” Proc., Highway Res. Board, 14, 448–477.
5.
Hall, F. L., Allen, B. L., and Gunter, M. A. (1986). “Empirical analysis of freeway flow-density relationships.” Transp. Res., 20A, 197– 210.
6.
LeVeque, R. J. (1992). Numerical methods for conservation laws, 2nd Ed., Lectures in Mathematics ETH Zurich, Birkhauser, Basel, Switzer-land.
7.
Lighthill, M. J., and Whitham, G. B. (1955). “On kinematic waves: II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads.” Proc., Royal Soc., London, A229(1178), 317–345.
8.
Payne, H. J. ( 1971). “Models of freeway traffic and control.” Simulation councils proceedings series: Mathematical models of public systems, George A. Bekey, ed., Vol. 1(1), 51–61.
9.
Richards, P. I. (1956). “Shock waves on the highway.” Operations Res., 4, 4251.
10.
Whitham, G. B. (1974). Linear and nonlinear waves. Wiley, New York.
11.
Zhang, H. M. (1998). “A theory of non-equilibrium traffic flow.” Transp. Res., 32B(7), 485–498.
12.
Zhang, H. M. (1999). “A mathematical theory of traffic hysteresis.” Transp. Res., 33B(1), 1–23.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 126 • Issue 1 • January 2000
Pages: 1 - 12
History
Received: Nov 6, 1998
Published online: Jan 1, 2000
Published in print: Jan 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.