Modeling of Required Preview Sight Distance
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 126, Issue 1
Abstract
Poor coordination of horizontal and vertical alignments can create locations where the available sight distance drops below the required sight distance. Therefore, current design guides have recommended a number of guidelines to enhance the alignment coordination. A better and more quantified approach for alignment coordination can be achieved using a concept, called sight distance red zones, based on 3D analysis. A red zone, based on preview sight distance (PVSD), is defined as a section of the road where a horizontal curve should not start relative to a vertical curve. This paper presents a framework to estimate the required PVSD, which is the sight distance required to see, perceive, and react to a horizontal curve before its beginning. The required PVSD consists of two parts: PVSD on tangent and PVSD on curve. A simple analytical model of PVSD on tangent is presented based on the laws of kinematics. The PVSD on curve was investigated empirically using physical modeling and computer animation. Curves with different radii (500–2,000 m), turning directions (left and right), and configurations (with and without spirals) were simulated. Using the collected data, the effect of curve parameters was examined, regression models for the required PVSD on curve were developed, and preliminary design values for the required PVSD are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Alexander, G. J., and Lunenfeld, H. (1986). “Driver expectancy in highway design and traffic operations.” Rep. No. FHWA-TO-86-1, Federal Highway Administration, Springfield, Va.
2.
A policy on geometric design of highways and streets. (1994). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Washington, D.C.
3.
Barber, K., and Van Duuren, D. ( 1997). “Determination of preview sight distance of horizontal curves.” Undergraduate Degree Project, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ont., Canada.
4.
Collins, K. M., and Krammes, R. A. (1996). “Preliminary validation of a speed-profile model for design consistency evaluation.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1523, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 11–21.
5.
Fambro, D. B., Fitzpatrick, K., and Koppa, R. J. ( 1997). “Determination of stopping sight distance.” NCHRP 400, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, D.C.
6.
Gattis, J. L., and Duncan, J. (1995). “Geometric design for adequate operational preview of road ahead.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1500, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 139–145.
7.
Gibbons, C., and Ruddy, K. ( 1998). “Determination of preview sight distance of horizontal curves using 3D computer modeling.” Undergraduate Degree Project, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ont., Canada.
8.
Gibreel, G. M., Easa, S. M., Hassan, Y., and El-Dimeery, I. A. (1999). “State of the art of highway geometric design consistency.”J. Transp. Engrg., ASCE, 125(4), 305–313.
9.
Glennon, J. C. (1988). “New and improved model of passing sight distance on two-lane highways.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1195, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 132–137.
10.
Hassan, Y., and Easa, S. M. (1998a). “Design considerations of sight distance red zones on crest curves.”J. Transp. Engrg., ASCE, 124(4), 343–352.
11.
Hassan, Y., and Easa, S. M. (1998b). “Sight distance red zones on combined horizontal and sag vertical curves.” Can. J. Civ. Engrg., Ottawa, 25(4), 621–630.
12.
Hassan, Y., Easa, S. M., and Abd El Halim, A. O. (1996). “Passing sight distance on two-lane highways: Review and revision.” J. Transp. Res., 30A(6), 453–467.
13.
Hassan, Y., Easa, S. M., and Abd El Halim, A. O. (1997). “Automation of determining passing and no-passing zones on two-lane highways.” Can. J. Civ. Engrg., Ottawa, 24(2), 263–275.
14.
Hassan, Y., Easa, S. M., and Abd El Halim, A. O. (1998a). “State-of-the-art of three-dimensional highway geometric design.” Can. J. Civ. Engrg., Ottawa, 25(3), 500–511.
15.
Hassan, Y., Easa, S. M., and Abd El Halim, A. O. (1998b). “Highway alignment: 3D problem and 3D solution.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1612, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 17–25.
16.
Highway design guide. (1995). French Administration for the Technical Studies of Road and Motorways, Paris.
17.
Lamm, R., and Choueiri, E. (1978). “Recommendations for evaluating horizontal design consistency based on investigations in the state of New York.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1122, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 68–78.
18.
Lieberman, E. B. (1982). “Model for calculating safe passing sight distance on two-lane rural roads.” Transp. Res. Rec. 869, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 70–76.
19.
Manual of geometric design standards for Canadian roads. (1986). Transportation Association of Canada (TAC), Ottawa.
20.
Manual of uniform traffic control devices. (1995). Ministry of Transportation, Ontario (MTO), Downsview, Ont., Canada.
21.
Ministry of Transportation, Ontario (MTO). (1995). “Preliminary design report.” W.P. 278-90-01 and W.P. 258-90-01. Thunder Bay, Ont., Canada.
22.
Neuman, T. R. (1989). “New approach to design for stopping sight distance.” Transp. Res. Rec. 923, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 26–34.
23.
Olson, P. L., Cleveland, D. E., Fancher, P. S., Koystyniuk, L. P., and Schneider, L. W. ( 1984). “Parameters affecting stopping sight distance.” NCHRP 270, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, D.C.
24.
Rillet, L. R., Hutchinson, B. G., and Whitney, M. (1990). “Mechanics of the passing maneuver and the impact of large trucks.” J. Transp. Res., 24A(2), 121–128.
25.
Romano, A. (1977). Applied statistics for science and industry. Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
26.
Saito, M. (1984). “Evaluation of the adequacy of the MUTCD minimum passing sight distance requirements for aborting the passing maneuver.” J. Inst. of Transp. Engrs., 54(1), 18–22.
27.
Teply, S. (1987). “Recent modifications to the Canadian pavement marking standards.” J. Inst. of Transp. Engrs., 57(5), 45–49.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 126 • Issue 1 • January 2000
Pages: 13 - 20
History
Received: Oct 22, 1998
Published online: Jan 1, 2000
Published in print: Jan 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.