Modeling Approach for Transit Rolling-Stock Deterioration Prediction
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 123, Issue 3
Abstract
An effective public transportation management system (PTMS) requires accurate and efficient models for the prediction of rolling-stock conditions. If the state of any given rolling-stock unit is known, its future condition can be predicted from the corresponding deterioration curves. The purpose of this study was twofold: first, to evaluate and model the relative importance of factors causing deterioration of rolling stock and, second, to provide projections of future condition to be used in transit capital programming. A methodology was developed for the estimation of rolling-stock deterioration models from condition rating data. Using a rolling-stock inspection data set from Indiana, the capabilities of the proposed methodology are empirically demonstrated. This ordered probit-based methodology provides models that are intuitively appealing, fundamentally sound, and a useful and easy-to-use tool in projecting future rolling-stock condition. The models presented in this paper are a part of the public transit management system being developed in Indiana for determining optimal rolling-stock maintenance, repair, and replacement strategies.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Ben-Akiva, M., and Lerman, S. R. (1985). Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
2.
Carnahan, J. V., Davis, W. J., and Shahin, M. Y.(1987). “Optimal maintenance decisions for pavement management.”J. Transp. Engrg., ASCE, 113(5), 554–572.
3.
Federal Transit Administration (FTA). (1994). “Rail modernization study.”Rep., U.S. Dept. of Transp., Washington, D.C.
4.
Greene, W. H. (1990). Econometric analysis. MacMillan Book Publishing Co., Inc., New York, N.Y.
5.
Jiang, Y., Saito, M., and Sinha, K. C. (1988). “Bridge performance prediction model using the Markov chain.”Transp. Res. Rec. 1180, Transp. Res. Board, Washington, D.C., 25–32.
6.
Limdep user's manual. (1995). Econometric Software Inc., Bellport, N.Y.
7.
Madanat, S. M., Mishalani, R., and Wan Ibrahim, W. H.(1995). “Estimation of infrastructure transition probabilities from condition rating data.”J. Infrastructure Sys., ASCE, 1(2), 120–125.
8.
Maddala, G. (1983). Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge University Press, New York, N.Y.
9.
Maddala, G. (1992). Introduction to econometrics, 2nd Ed., McMillan Book Publishing Co., Inc., New York, N.Y.
10.
McCullagh, P.(1980). “Regression models for ordinal data.”J. Royal Statistical Soc., London, England, 42(2), 109–142.
11.
Sinha, K. C., Fwa, T. F., Sharef, E. A., Tee, A. B., and Michael, H. L. (1984). “Highway cost allocation study: final report.”FHWA/IN/JHRP-84-20, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, Ind.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: May 1, 1997
Published in print: May 1997
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.