Characteristics of Fixed‐Roadside‐Object Side‐Impact Accidents
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 117, Issue 3
Abstract
Each year approximately 160,000 people are involved in accidents where the side of a vehicle strikes a fixed‐roadside object such as a tree, utility pole, or guardrail. Of these 160,000 occupants, 60,000 are injured and 1,600 are killed. When a side‐impact accident with a fixed object occurs, an occupant has one chance in three that he will be injured and one chance in 100 that they will be fatally injured. This level of injury and death represents a loss to our society of $3 billion each year. Trees and utility poles are by far the most frequently struck objects, the objects that result in the highest risk of injury, and hence the objects causing the greatest loss to society. Data from the National Accident Sampling System and the Fatal Accident Reporting System are used to identify characteristics of this accident scenario.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
“Data on characteristics of motor vehicles.” Technical report, Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association.
2.
“Fatal accident reporting system.” (1987). Tech. Report, Nat. Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.
3.
“Fatal accident reporting system—coding and validation manual.” (1983). Tech. Report, Nat. Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.
4.
Fox, J. C., Good, M. C., and Joubert, P. N. (1979). “Collisions with utility poles.” Tech. Report, Australia Dept. of Transp., Feb.
5.
“A guide for accommodating utilities within highway right‐of‐way.” (1981). Tech. Report, American Association of State Highway and Transp. Officials, Standing Committee on Highways.
6.
Jones, I. S., and Baum, A. S. (1980). “An analysis of the urban utility pole accident problem.” Tech. Report FHWA‐RD‐79‐117, Federal Highway Administration, Dec.
7.
Mak, K. K., and Mason, R. L. (1980). “Accident analysis—breakaway and non‐breakaway poles including sign and light standards along highways.” Tech. Report, Nat. Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C., Aug.
8.
Michie, J. D. (1981). “Recommended procedures for the safety performance evaluation of highway appurtenances.” Tech. Report 230, Nat. Highway Cooperative Res. Program.
9.
“Motor vehicle accident costs.” (1988). FHWA Tech. Advisory T 7570.1, Federal Highway Administration, Jun.
10.
“National accident sampling system—coding, validation and editing manual.” (1985). Tech. Report, Nat. Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.
11.
“National accident sampling system—1985.” (1987). Tech. Report DOT HS 807 074, Nat. Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C., Feb.
12.
The 1989 Information Please Almanac. (1989). 42nd Ed., Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Mass.
13.
Partyka, S. C. (1983). “The analyst's primer: Getting started with the national accident sampling system.” Tech. Report, Nat. Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C., Dec.
14.
“A policy on the accommodation of utilities within freeway right‐of‐way.” (1989). Tech. Report, Amer. Assoc. of State Highway and Transp. Officials, Standing Committee on Highways, Feb.
15.
“The safer roadside.” (1988). Tech. Report, State of Washington Dept. of Transp.
16.
Turner, D. S., and Mansfield, E. R. (1989). “Urban trees and roadside safety.” J. Transp. Engrg., 116(1), 90–103.
17.
“Utilities accommodation policy.” (1988). Tech. Report, State of Washington Dept. of Transp.
18.
Zeigler, A. J. (1986). “Guide to management of roadside trees.” Tech. Report FHWA‐IP‐86‐17, Michigan Dept. of Transp.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 ASCE.
History
Published online: May 1, 1991
Published in print: May 1991
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.