Modal Split in Recreational Transport Planning
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 110, Issue 1
Abstract
Recreational modal split is examined in a study area consisting of two groups of Greek islands, resorts, one in the Central Aegean where available modes are conventional ship and airplane, the other in the Argosaronikos region where conventional ship and hydrofoil operate. Seven established models are calibrated using an aggregate data base. It is shown that the logit model is the most suitable in these circumstances. The calibration technique allows an optimum “value of time” to be determined but the paper questions the validity of this concept in a recreational context. When distances are relatively long (in the Central Aegean) overall travel time is strongly related to mode choice. On the shorter routes in the Argosaronikos region, the most significant variable is service frequency. No significant relationship with direct travel cost is found in either area. A study of the mathematical form in which variables (e.g. time, frequency) enter the model shows that mode choice is best described when the difference of the respective dependent variable between modes relative to its value for the fastest mode is used (ratio form), instead of the more traditional form simply using differences.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Beimborn, E. A., “Terminal Access and the Choice of Intercity Modes,” Transportation Engineering Journal of ASCE, Aug., 1969, pp. 463–481.
2.
Beimborn, E. A., “Impedance Minimisation Travel Choice Process,” Transportation Engineering Journal of ASCE, May, 1972, pp. 177–190.
3.
Bruzelius, N., The Value of Travel Time, Groom Helm Ltd., London, 1979.
4.
Cherwony, W., and Lutin, J., “Two Dimensional Logit Modal Split Models,” Transportation Engineering Journal of ASCE, Aug., 1976, pp. 525–536.
5.
de Donnea, F. X., The Determinants of Transport Mode Choice in Dutch Cities; Some Dissaggregate Stochastic Models, Rotterdam University Press, Rotterdam, 1971.
6.
Evans, A. W., “Inter‐city Travel and the London‐Midland Electrification,” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 3, No. 1, Jan., 1969, pp. 69–95.
7.
Heraty, M. J., and Day, D. J., “Experience with a Personalised Bus Service for Heathrow Airport Staff,” PTRC Summer Annual Meeting, Warwick, England, 1974.
8.
Hutchinson, B. G., Principles of Urban Transport Systems Planning, Scripta Company, Washington, D.C., 1974, pp. 21–23.
9.
Leak, G. R., and Underwood, J. R., “Modelling Intercity Modal Split: Rail versus Air,” Transportation Engineering, Aug., 1977, pp. 35–39.
10.
“London Transport, Personalised Bus Services for Heathrow Airport Staff,” LT Operational Research Report R173, 1971.
11.
Rassam, P. R., Ellis, R., and Bennett, J. C., “The N‐Dimensional Logit Model: Development and Application,” Highway Research Record 369, Washington, D.C., 1971, pp. 135–147.
12.
Reichman, S., and Stopher, P. R., “Disaggregate Stochastic Models of Travel‐Mode Choice,” Highway Research Record 369, Washington, D.C., 1971, pp. 91–103.
13.
Stathopoulos, A., and Theologitis, I., “An Appraisal of Advanced Technology Application in Intercity Transport,” Technica Chronica Scientific Journal the Technical Chamber of Greece, Feb., 1980, pp. 36–44.
14.
Stopher, P. R., “Factors Affecting Choice of Mode of Transport,” thesis presented to the University of London, at London, England, in 1967, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
15.
Stopher, P. R., “Predicting Travel Mode Choice for the Work Journey,” Traffic Engineering and Control, Jan., 1968.
16.
Stopher, P. R., and Lavender, J. O., “Disaggregate, Behavioural Demand Models: Empirical Tests of Three Hypotheses,” Proceedings, Transportation Research Forum, Vol. XIII, No. 1, 1972, pp. 321–336.
17.
Stopher, P. R., and Meyburg, A. H., Urban Transportation Modelling and Planning, D.C. Heath and Company, Lexington, Mass., 1975.
18.
Stopher, P. R., and Meyburg, A. H., Behavioural Travel Demand Models, D. C. Heath and Co., Lexington, Mass., 1976.
19.
Stopher, P. R., and Meyburg, A. H., Transportation Systems Evaluation, D. C. Heath and Company, Lexington, Mass., 1976, pp. 37–66.
20.
Theil, H., “A Multinomial Extension of the Linear Logit Models,” International Economic Review, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1969, pp. 251–259.
21.
Theologitis, I., “Planning for Recreational Travel; A Case Study in the Aegean Sea Area,” thesis presented to the University of London, at London, England, in Sept., 1982, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
22.
“Transport Services to the Islands,” Transport Coordination Study—Phase II, Italconsult, P.T.R.C., Hellenic Republic, Ministry of Coordination, Rome‐Athens, Mar., 1981.
23.
Vickerman, R. W., “Travel Choices for Recreational Journeys,” Determinants of Travel Choice, D. Hensher and A. Dalvi, eds., Saxon House, England, 1979, pp. 312–334.
24.
Warner, S. L., Stochastic Choice of Mode in Urban Travel: A Study in Binary Choice, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Ill., 1962.
25.
Waston, P. L., “Problems Associated with Time and Cost Data Used in Travel Choice Modelling and Valuation of Time,” Highway Research Record 369, Washington, D.C., 1971, pp. 148–158.
26.
Watson, P. L., The Value of Time, Behavioural Models of Modal Choice, D. C. Heath and Co., Lexington, Mass., 1974.
27.
Wilson, A. G., Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling, Pion, London, 1970.
28.
Wilson, A. G., “Further Developments of Entropy Maximising Transport Models,” Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 1, 1973, pp. 183–193.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1984
Published in print: Jan 1984
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.