Seismic Risk Assessment of Gravity Load Designed Reinforced Concrete Frames Subjected to Mid-America Ground Motions
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 4
Abstract
The infrequent nature of earthquakes in the Central and Eastern United States (CEUS), and the fact that none with intensity comparable to the New Madrid sequence of 1811-12 has occurred in the past century, have caused the earthquake hazard in the CEUS to be neglected until quite recently. The performance of reinforced concrete (RC) frames in the CEUS may be deficient if they are subjected to earthquakes that are believed to be plausible in the New Madrid Seismic Zone (NMSZ). This study presents a set of probability-based tools for seismic vulnerability and risk assessment of such gravity load designed (GLD) RC frames, and uses these tools to evaluate the seismic vulnerability of RC frames that are representative of the building inventory in Memphis, Tenn.—the largest population center close to the NMSZ. This evaluation indicates that traditional GLD RC frames have a substantial probability of suffering life-threatening damage or collapse in the event that they are subjected to earthquake demands stipulated in recent seismic design regulations such as ASCE Standard 7-05.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. NSFEEC-9701785 to the Mid-America Earthquake Center. This support is gratefully acknowledged. However, the views expressed are solely those of the writers and may not represent the position of either the MAE Center or the NSF.
References
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (1989). “Building code requirements for reinforced concrete.” ACI 318–89, and “Commentary.” ACI 318R-89, ACI Committee 318, Detroit.
ASCE. (2007). “Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings.” ASCE/SEI 41–06, Reston, Va.
Aslani, H., and Miranda, E. (2005). “Probability-based seismic response analysis.” Eng. Struct., 27(8), 1151–1163.
Beres, A., White, R. N., and Gergely, P. (1992). “Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete frame structures with nonductile details: Part I—Summary of experimental findings of full scale beam-column joint tests.” Technical Rep. No. NCEER-92–0024, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, N.Y.
Bertero, R. D., and Bertero, V. V. (2002). “Performance-based seismic engineering: The need for a reliable conceptual comprehensive approach.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 627–652.
Celik, O. C. (2007). “Probabilistic assessment of non-ductile reinforced concrete frames susceptible to Mid-America ground motions.” Ph.D. dissertation, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
Celik, O. C., and Ellingwood, B. R. (2008). “Modeling beam-column joints in fragility assessment of gravity load designed reinforced concrete frames.” J. Earthquake Eng., 12(3), 357–381.
Chandler, A. M., and Lam, N. T. K. (2001). “Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: A multi-disciplinary review.” Eng. Struct., 23(12), 1525–1543.
Cornell, C. A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R. O., and Foutch, D. A. (2002). “Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines.” J. Struct. Eng., 128(4), 526–533.
Ellingwood, B. R., Celik, O. C., and Kinali, K. (2007). “Fragility assessment of building structural systems in Mid-America.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(13), 1935–1952.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (1997). “NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures and commentary.” FEMA 302/303, Washington, D.C.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2003a). “Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology.” Earthquake model, HAZUS-MH MR1 technical manual, Washington, D.C.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2003b). “NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures and commentary.” FEMA 450, Washington, D.C.
Fernandez, J. A., and Rix, G. J. (2006). “Soil attenuation relationships and seismic hazard analyses in the Upper Mississippi Embayment.” Proc., 8th U.S. National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (CD-ROM), Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, Calif.
French, S., and Olshansky, R. (2001). “Inventory of essential facilities in Mid-America.” Project SE-1 Final Rep., Mid-America Earthquake Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Ill., ⟨http://mae.cee.uiuc.edu⟩ (July 31, 2006).
Healey, J. J., Wu, S. T., and Murga, M. (1980). “Structural building response review.” NUREG/CR-1423, Vol. I, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.
Hoffmann, G. W., Kunnath, S. K., Reinhorn, A. M., and Mander, J. B. (1992). “Gravity-load-designed reinforced concrete buildings: Seismic evaluation of existing construction and detailing strategies for improved seismic resistance.” Technical Rep. No. NCEER-92–0016, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, N.Y.
Kurose, Y., Guimaraes, G. N., Zuhua, L., Kreger, M. E., and Jirsa, J. O. (1991). “Evaluation of slab-beam-column connections subjected to bidirectional loading.” Design of beam-column joints for seismic resistance, Publication SP-123, J. O. Jirsa, ed., American Concrete Institute, Detroit, 39–67.
Kwon, O. S., and Elnashai, A. (2006). “The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure.” Eng. Struct., 28(2), 289–303.
Leyendecker, E. V., Hunt, R. J., Frankel, A. D., and Rukstales, K. S. (2000). “Development of maximum considered earthquake ground motion maps.” Earthquake Spectra, 16(1), 21–40.
McKenna, F., and Fenves, G. L. (2006). “Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees) user manual.” University of California, Berkeley, Calif., ⟨http://opensees.berkeley.edu⟩ (July 31, 2006).
Park, R., Priestley, M. J. N., and Gill, W. D. (1982). “Ductility of square-confined concrete columns.” J. Struct. Div., 108(ST4), 929–950.
Ramamoorthy, S. K., Gardoni, P., and Bracci, J. M. (2008). “Seismic fragility and confidence bounds for gravity load designed reinforced concrete frames of varying height.” J. Struct. Eng., 134(4), 639–650.
Rix, G. J., and Fernandez, J. A. (2006). “Probabilistic ground motions for selected cities in the Upper Mississippi Embayment.” Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, ⟨http://www.ce.gatech.edu/~geosys/soil_dynamics/research/groundmotionsembay/⟩ (July 31, 2006).
Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC). (1995). Vision 2000: Performance-based seismic engineering of buildings. Sacramento, Calif.
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2002). “Interactive deaggregations.” ⟨http://eqint.cr.usgs.gov/eq-men/html/deaggint2002-06.html⟩ (May 11, 2007).
Vamvatsikos, D., and Cornell, C. A. (2002). “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491–514.
Wen, Y. K., Ellingwood, B. R., and Bracci, J. (2004). “Vulnerability function framework for consequence-based engineering.” Project DS-4 Rep., Mid-America Earthquake Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Ill., ⟨http://mae.cee.uiuc.edu⟩ (July 31, 2006).
Wen, Y. K., Ellingwood, B. R., Veneziano, D., and Bracci, J. (2003). “Uncertainty modeling in earthquake engineering (white paper).” Project FD-2 Rep., Mid-America Earthquake Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Ill., ⟨http://mae.cee.uiuc.edu⟩ (July 31, 2006).
Wen, Y. K., and Wu, C. L. (2001). “Uniform hazard ground motions for Mid-America cities.” Earthquake Spectra, 17(2), 359–384.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Nov 6, 2007
Accepted: Aug 26, 2008
Published online: Apr 1, 2009
Published in print: Apr 2009
Notes
Note. Associate Editor: Rakesh K. Goel
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.