TECHNICAL PAPERS
Apr 1, 2009

Impact of Code Requirements in the Central United States: Seismic Performance Assessment of a Reinforced Concrete Building

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 4

Abstract

The close proximity to the New Madrid Seismic Zone and the significant population and infrastructure presents a need to evaluate the seismic provisions in building codes adopted in Memphis, Tenn., and other central U.S. cities. This investigation identifies potential deficiencies for a typical four-story reinforced concrete (RC) frame building designed to current code requirements in the central United States. The structure was designed for three sets of seismic provisions: the 2003 International Building Code (IBC), the 2003 IBC with local Memphis amendments, and the 1999 Standard Building Code (SBC). Special seismic detailing was required for the IBC and SBC designs, whereas the amended IBC design required only intermediate seismic detailing. The nonlinear structural analysis for two earthquake recurrence intervals (10 and 2% in 50years ) indicates special seismic detailing can provide a significant improvement in the seismic performance of similar low- to midrise RC buildings in the central United States.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported under a National Science FoundationNSF Graduate Research Fellowship and contributes to research conducted by the Mid-America Earthquake (MAE) Center. The writers wish to thank the MAE Center for collaborating on this research. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the sponsors.

References

Abrams, D. P., and Shinozuka, M., eds. (1997). Loss assessment of Memphis buildings, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, N.Y.
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (1995). “Building code requirements for structural concrete.” ACI 318-95, ACI Committee 318, Farmington Hills, Mich.
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2002). “Building code requirements for structural concrete” ACI 318-02, ACI Committee 318, Farmington Hills, Mich.
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). (2000). “Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings” FEMA 356, American Society of Civil Engineers, Washington, D.C.
Beavers, J. (2002). “A review of seismic hazard description in US design codes and procedures.” Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater., 4(1), 46–63.
Bracci, J. M., Reinhorn, A. M., and Mander, J. B. (1995). “Seismic resistance of reinforced concrete frame structures designed for gravity loads: Performance of structural system.” ACI Struct. J., 92(5), 597–609.
Census. (2000). United States Census Data, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D.C.
City of Memphis and Shelby County. (2005). “Appendix L—Alternate seismic protection calculations and procedures.” Memphis and Shelby County 2005 joint building code local amendments, Memphis, Tenn.
Computers and Structures, Inc. (CSI). (2002). An introduction to ETABS, Version 8, Berkeley, Calif.
El-Attar, A. G., White, R. N., and Gergely, P. (1997). “Behavior of gravity load design reinforced concrete buildings subjected to earthquakes.” ACI Struct. J., 94(2), 133–145.
Elnashai, A. S., Papanikolaou, V., and Lee, D. H. (2002). ZEUS-NL user manual, Mid-America Earthquake Center, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Ill.
Erberik, M. A., and Elnashai, A. S. (2004). “Fragility analysis of flat-slab structures.” Eng. Struct., 26(7), 937–948.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (1985). “An assessment of damage and casualties for six cities in the central United States resulting from earthquakes in the New Madrid seismic zones.” Prepared under Contract No. EMK-C-0057 (CUSEPP), Washington, D.C.
French, S., and Muthukumar, S. (2004), Shelby County inventory database, Mid-America Earthquake Center, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Ill.
Hueste, M. D., and Bai, J.-W. (2007a). “Seismic retrofit of a reinforced concrete flat-slab structure: Part I—Seismic performance evaluation.” Eng. Struct., 29(6), 1165–1177.
Hueste, M. D., and Bai, J.-W. (2007b). “Seismic retrofit of a reinforced concrete flat-slab structure: Part II—Seismic fragility analysis.” Eng. Struct., 29(6), 1178–1188.
International Code Council (ICC). (2003). “International building code.” IBC 2003, Falls Church, Va.
Jeong, S. H., and Elnashai, A. S. (2005). “Analytical assessment of an irregular RC frame for full scale 3D pseudo-dynamic testing. Part I: Analytical model verification.” J. Earthquake Eng., 9(1), 95–128.
Mander, J. B., Priestley, J. N., and Park, R. (1988). “Observed stress-strain behavior of confined concrete.” J. Struct. Eng., 114(8), 1827–1849.
Pincheira, J. A., and Jirsa, J. O. (1995). “Seismic response of RC frames retrofitted with steel braces or walls.” J. Struct. Eng., 121(8), 1225–1235.
Ramamoorthy, S., Gardoni, P., and Bracci, J. (2006). “Probabilistic demand models and fragility curves for reinforced concrete frame.” J. Struct. Eng., 132(10), 1563–1572.
Rix, G. J., and Fernandez, J. A. (2006). “Probabilistic ground motions for selected cities in the upper Mississippi embayment.” Georgia Institute of Technology, ⟨http:www.ce.gatech.edu/~geosys/soil_dynamics/research/groundmotionsembay/⟩ (Mar. 6, 2006).
Romero, S., and Rix, G. J. (2001). “Regional variation in near-surface shear wave velocity in the greater Memphis area.” Eng. Geol. (Amsterdam), 62(37259), 137–158.
Southern Building Code Congress International (SBCCI). (1999). “Standard building code (SBC).” Southern Building Code Congress International, Birmingham, Ala.
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2006). “Seismic design values for buildings.” ⟨http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/hazmaps/design/⟩ (Feb. 3, 2006).
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2008). “Seismic design values for buildings.” ⟨http://earthquake.usgs. gov/research/hazmaps/design/⟩ (Oct. 30, 2008).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 135Issue 4April 2009
Pages: 404 - 413

History

Received: Oct 4, 2007
Accepted: Sep 26, 2008
Published online: Apr 1, 2009
Published in print: Apr 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Notes

Note. Associate Editor: Akshay Gupta

Authors

Affiliations

Erin Kueht
Graduate Research Assistant, Zachry Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843-3136.
Mary Beth Hueste, M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
E.B. Snead II Associate Professor, Zachry Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843-3136. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share