Seismic Evaluation of Steel Moment Frame Buildings Designed Using Different -Values
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 132, Issue 9
Abstract
Current seismic design procedures, which permit the estimation of inelastic deformation capacity of lateral force resisting systems, have been questioned since no rationality exists for determining the values of tabulated in seismic design codes. This study focuses on the seismic behavior of three-, nine-, and 20-story steel moment resisting frame (MRF) structures designed using different factors (8, 9, 10, 11, and 12). A total of 30 different structures were subjected to 20 ground motions representing the hazard level equal to a 2% probability of being exceeded in 50 years (2% in 50 years) for a detailed case study. Then, a reliability-based performance evaluation procedure, which provides a degree of confidence for satisfying the collapse prevention (CP) performance objective, was applied to model buildings to assess the effect of the factor variations. The results show that the current factors provide conservative designs for the three- and nine-story buildings for achieving the CP performance objective. However, the 20-story buildings designed with different factors without the minimum spectral acceleration bound on prescribed in the 2000 International Building Code show a low level of confidence for achieving CP performance.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Grant No. KOSEFR08-2003-000-11106-0 from the Basic Research Program of the Korea Research Foundation (KRF). This support is sincerely appreciated. Any findings, results, or conclusions are solely those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the KRF acknowledged above.
References
ASCE. (2003). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” ASCE 7-02, Reston, Va.
Applied Technology Council (ATC). (1978). “Tentative recommendations for the development of seismic regulations for buildings.” Rep. ATC3-06, Redwood City, Calif.
Applied Technology Council (ATC). (1995). “A critical review of current approaches to earthquake-resistant design.” Rep. ATC-34, Redwood City, Calif.
Cornell, A. C., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R. O., and Foutch, D. A. (2002). “Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines.” J. Struct. Eng., 128(4), 526–533.
FEMA. (1995). “Interim guidelines: Evaluation, repair, modification and design of welded steel moment frame structures.” Rep. FEMA-267, Washington, D.C.
FEMA. (2000). “2000 Edition: NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. II: Commentary.” FEMA 369, Washington, D.C.
Foutch, D. A. (2000). “State of the art report on performance prediction and evaluation of steel moment-frame buildings.” SAC Rep. No. FEMA 355F, Prepared by the SAC Joint Venture for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
Foutch, D. A., and Shi, S. (1998). “Effects of hysteresis types on the seismic effects of buildings.” Proc., 6th U.S. National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, Calif.
Foutch, D. A., and Yun, S.-Y. (2002). “Modeling of steel moment frames for seismic loads.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 58, 529–564.
Gupta, A., and Krawinkler, H. (2000). “Dynamic -delta effects for flexible inelastic steel structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 126(1), 145–154.
Hamburger, R. O., Foutch, D. A., and Cornell, C. A. (2003). “Translating research to practice: FEMA/SAC performance-based design procedures.” Earthquake Spectra, 19(2), 357–379.
International Building Code (IBC). (2000). International Code Council, Falls Church, Va.
Jalayer, F., and Cornell, C. A. (1998). “Development of a probability-based demand and capacity factor design seismic format.” SAC background document, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, Calif.
Krawinkler, H., and Mohasseb, S. (1987). “Effects of panel zone deformations on seismic response.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 8, 233–250.
Lee, K., and Foutch, D. A. (2002). “Performance evaluation of new steel frame buildings for seismic loads.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 653–670.
Miranda, E., and Bertero, V. V. (1994). “Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant design.” Earthquake Spectra, 10(2), 357–379.
Prakash, V., Powell, G. H., and Campbell, S. (1993). DRAIN-2DX, element description and user guide, Univ. California, Berkeley, Calif.
Roeder, C. W. (2000). “State of art report on connection performance.” SAC Rep. No. FEMA 355D, Prepared by the SAC Joint Venture for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
Shi, S., and Foutch, D. A. (1997). “Connection element (Type 10) for Drain-2DX.” Civil Eng. Rep., Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Ill.
Shome, N., and Cornell, C. A. (1999). “Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures.” Rep. RMS-35, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
Somerville, P., Smith, N., Puntamurthula, S., and Sun, J. (1997). “Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project.” SAC background document SAC/BD-97/04, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, Calif.
Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC). (1959). “Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary.” Seismology Committee, Sacramento, Calif.
Vamvatsikos, D., and Cornell, C. A. (2002). “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491–514.
Yun, S.-Y., Hamburger, R. O., Cornell, C. A., and Foutch, D. A. (2002). “Seismic performance evaluation for steel moment frames.” J. Struct. Eng., 128(4), 534–545.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: Mar 17, 2004
Accepted: Nov 29, 2005
Published online: Sep 1, 2006
Published in print: Sep 2006
Notes
Note. Associate Editor: Sherif El-Tawil
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.