Seismic Interaction of Interconnected Electrical Substation Equipment
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 126, Issue 10
Abstract
This paper investigates experimentally the dynamic interaction between components of electrical substation equipment interconnected by rigid bus conductors. Specific tests conducted in this study were (1) quasi-static tests of three different types of rigid bus with spring connectors; (2) quasi-static tests of one rigid bus slider; and (3) shake table tests of five different pairs of generic substation equipment specimens interconnected by three different rigid bus assemblies. All connectors tested exhibited stable hysteretic behavior with various degrees of energy dissipation capacity. The spring connectors dissipate energy through yielding and generated the highest forces among the connector tested and generally caused an amplification of the dynamic response of one of the interconnected equipment components. The bus slider dissipated energy through friction and generated lower forces than those of the spring connectors. Its high damping capacity, however, systematically reduced the dynamic response of interconnected equipment components. Finally, a special seismic connector that incorporates three flexural vertical aluminum cables generated the lowest forces. Its minimal damping capacity, however, resulted in higher equipment dynamic response than with the bus slider.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Applied Technology Council (ATC). ( 1992). “Guidelines for cyclic seismic testing of components of steel structures.” ATC-24, Redwood City, Calif.
2.
ASTM. ( 1999). “Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials.” E 8-99, West Conshohocken, Pa.
3.
Benuska, L. tech. ed. ( 1990). “Loma Prieta earthquake reconnaissance report.” Earthquake Spectra, Supplement to Vol. 6, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, Calif.
4.
Clough, R. W., and Penzien, J. ( 1993). Dynamics of structures, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
5.
Der Kiureghian, A., Sackman, J. L., and Hong, K.-J. ( 1999). “Interaction in interconnected electrical substation equipment subjected to earthquake ground motions.” Rep. PEER 1999/01, Pacific Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
6.
Filiatrault, A., Kremmidas, S., Seible, F., Clark, A. J., Nowak, R., and Thoen, B. K. ( 2000). “Upgrade of first generation uniaxial seismic simulation system with second generation real-time three-variable digital control system.” Proc., 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engrg., New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Upper Hutt, New Zealand (on CD-ROM).
7.
Hall, J. tech. ed. ( 1995). “Northridge earthquake of January 17, 1994 reconnaissance report Volume 1.” Earthquake Spectra, Supplement to Vol. 11, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, Calif.
8.
IEEE. ( 1997). “Recommended practices for seismic design of substations.” IEEE-693, IEEE Standards Dept., Piscataway, N.J.
9.
Jablonski, A. M., Law, K. T., Lau, D. T., Pierre, J.-R., and Tang, J. H. K. ( 1990). “The 1989 Loma Prieta (San Francisco Area) earthquake: Site visit report.” Internal Rep. No. 594, Inst. for Res. in Constr., National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa.
10.
Starkel, D. L., Mueller, W., III, and Kempner, L. ( 1998). “Seismic evaluation seismic connection with rigid bus conductor.” Portland State University, Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oreg.
11.
U2 & V2 manual. (1993). Experimental Dynamic Investigations, Vancouver.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Oct 5, 1999
Published online: Oct 1, 2000
Published in print: Oct 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.