Triaxiality and Fracture of Steel Moment Connections
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 126, Issue 10
Abstract
The connections of welded steel moment frames undergo a complex multiaxial state of stress that leads to high levels of stress triaxiality. As triaxiality increases, the propensity for fracture increases. Classic engineering models of fracture and modern microscale models of fracture mechanisms explicitly consider the role of triaxiality. Nonetheless, triaxiality is generally not directly considered by structural engineers. In this paper, triaxiality is defined as the ratio of the maximum principal stress to the von Mises stress. Triaxiality and maximum principal stress demands are investigated for tests on fractured notched round bars, small-scale tension specimens, and a full-scale moment connection. Based on analysis of the tests, it is proposed that, for fractures driven by triaxiality demands, the maximum principal stress at fracture is a function of the level of triaxiality. Calculation of the triaxiality demands requires 3D nonlinear analysis and depends on the loading, connection geometry, and postyield stress-strain relationships of all parent and weld metals. Examination of a welded steel moment connection indicates particularly high triaxiality demands. The triaxiality demands indicate that fracture of these connections may be governed by triaxiality even when high toughness parent and weld metals are used.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Blodgett, O. W. ( 1976). Design of welded structures, James F. Lincoln Arc Welding Foundation, Cleveland.
2.
Bridgman, W. P. ( 1964). Studies in large plastic flow and fracture with special emphasis on the effects of hydrostatic pressure, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
3.
Chi, W. M., Deierlein, G. G., and Ingraffea, A. R. (2000). “Fracture toughness demands in welded beam-column moment connections.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 126(1), 88–97.
4.
Fu, J. Q., and Shi, Y. W. ( 1996). “Effect of cracked weld joint and yield strength dissimilarity on crack tip stress triaxiality.” Theoretical and Appl. Fracture Mech., 25, 51–57.
5.
Ganti, S., and Parks, D. M. ( 1997). “Elastic-plastic fracture mechanics of strength-mismatched interface cracks.” Recent advances in fracture, R. K. Mahidhara, A. B. Geltmacher, P. Matic, and K. Sadananda, eds., Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, New York, 13–25.
6.
Geltmacher, A. B., Koss, D. A., Matic, P., and Stout, M. G. ( 1996). “A modeling of the effect of stress state on void linking during ductile fracture.” Acta Materialia, 44(6), 2201–2210.
7.
Gensamer, M. ( 1941). Strength of metals under combined stresses, American Society for Metals, Cleveland.
8.
Kaufmann, E. J., and Fisher, J. W. ( 1995a). “Fracture analysis of failed moment frame weld joints produced in full-scale laboratory tests and buildings damaged in the Northridge earthquake.” Technical Report: Experimental Investigations of Materials, Weldments and Nondestructive Examination Techniques, Rep. No. SAC 95-08, SAC Joint Venture, Calif.
9.
Kaufmann, E. J., and Fisher, J. W. ( 1995b). “A study of the effects of material and welding factors on moment frame weld joint performance using a small-scale tension specimen.” Technical Report: Experimental Investigations of Materials, Weldments and Nondestructive Examination Techniques, Rep. No. SAC 95-08, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramento, Calif.
10.
Kuwamura, H., and Akiyama, H. ( 1994). “Brittle fracture under repeated high stresses.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 29.
11.
Kuwamura, H., and Yamamoto, K. (1997). “Ductile crack as trigger of brittle fracture in steel.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 123(6), 729–735.
12.
McAdam, D. J., Jr. ( 1994). “The technical cohesive strength of metals in terms of the principal stresses.” Metals technology, Vol. 1, American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers, Inc., New York, 5–31.
13.
McClintock, F. A. ( 1967). “A criterion for ductile fracture by the growth of holes.” J. Appl. Mech., 35, 363–371.
14.
Rice, J. R., and Tracey, D. M. ( 1969). “On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields.” J. Mech. and Phys. of Solids, 17, 201–217.
15.
Ritchie, R. O., Knott, J. F., and Rice, J. R. ( 1973). “On the relationship between critical tensile stress and fracture toughness in mild steel.” J. Mech. and Phys. of Solids, 34, 477–496.
16.
SAC Joint Venture. ( 1996). “Technical report: Experimental investigations of beam-column subassemblages.” Rep. No. SAC 96-01, Sacramento, Calif.
17.
Schlüter, N., Grimpe, F., Bleck, W., and Dahl, W. ( 1996). “Modelling of the damage in ductile steels.” Computational materials science, Vol. 7, Elsevier Science, New York, 27–33.
18.
Wiesner, C. S. ( 1996). The “local approach” to cleavage fracture: Concepts and applications, Abington Publishing, Cambridge, England.
19.
Yang, T.-S., and Popov, E. P. ( 1995). “Behavior of pre-Northridge moment resisting steel connections.” Rep. No. UCB/EERC-95/08, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., University of California, Berkeley, Calif.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 126 • Issue 10 • October 2000
Pages: 1131 - 1139
History
Received: May 3, 1999
Published online: Oct 1, 2000
Published in print: Oct 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.