TECHNICAL PAPERS
May 1, 1994

Fatigue‐Reliability Evaluation of Steel Bridges

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 120, Issue 5

Abstract

The fatigue reliability of steel‐bridge components is evaluated. The most commonly used SN curve‐based American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) method is considered first. The limit‐state equation and the uncertainty associated with all the basic random variables are quantified. Using the advanced first‐order second‐moment method, the corresponding probability of failure is calculated in terms of the reliability index. It is observed that the reliability index is very similar to other design problems involving steel structures. Since the AASHTO approach cannot incorporate the crack‐size information even if it is known at the time of evaluation, an alternative linear‐elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) method is proposed. The corresponding limit‐state equation and the basic variables are identified, and the uncertainties associated with them are quantified. The reliability index is calculated similarly. For comparison purposes, the reliability indexes according to the AASHTO and LEFM approaches are evaluated for full‐penetration butt welds in the tension flange of a steel‐box girder used in a public‐transportation system. The reliability indexes are almost identical, at least around the design life of 50 years. The LEFM approach still retains the simplicity of the AASHTO method, yet it is extremely powerful and efficient and can incorporate information on crack size as inspection results become available. It is proposed that the LEFM can be used as an alternative to the AASHTO method in the fatigue‐damage evaluation of steel bridges. The LEFM method is extended in the companion paper to incorporate information from inspections and the corresponding updating of the underlying reliability.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Albrecht, P., and Yamada, K. (1977). “Rapid calculation of stress intensity factors.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 103(2), 377–389.
2.
Albrecht, P., and Yazdani, N. (1986). “Risk analysis of extending the service life of steel bridges.” FHWA/MD No. 84/01, University of Maryland, College Park, Md.
3.
Ang, A. S. H., and Tang, W. H. (1984). Probability concepts in engineering planning and design, Vol. 2, John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y.
4.
Ayyub, B., and Haldar, A. (1984). “Practical structural reliability techniques.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 110(8), 1,707–1,724.
5.
ASCE Committee on Fatigue and Fracture Reliability of the Committee on Structural Safety and Reliability of the Structural Division. (1982). “Fatigue reliability 1–4.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 108(1), 3–88.
6.
Fisher, J. W. (1984). Fatigue and fracture in steel bridges. John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y.
7.
Guide specifications for fatigue of steel bridges. (1989). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Washington, D.C.
8.
Harris, D. O. (1977). “A means of assessing the effects of NDT on the reliability of cyclically loading structures.” Mat. Evaluation, 35(7), 57–69.
9.
Jiao, G. T. (1989). “Reliability analysis of crack growth under random loading considering model updating,” PhD thesis, Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
10.
Jiao, G. Y., and Moan, T. (1989). “Methods for fatigue reliability analysis considering updating through nondestructive inspections.” Rep. MK/R, No. 108/89, Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
11.
Kanegaonkar, H. B., and Haldar, A. (1987). “Non‐Gaussian response of offshore platforms: dynamic.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 113(9), 1,882–1,898.
12.
Lawerence, F. V. (1978). “Estimating the fatigue crack initiation life of welds.” ASTM STP 648, ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa.
13.
Lutes, L. D., Corazao, M., Hu, S. L. J., and Zimmerman, J. (1984). “Stochastic fatigue damage accumulation.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 110(11), 2,585–2,601.
14.
Madsen, H. O. (1985). “Random fatigue crack growth and inspection.” Proc., ICOSSAR '85, Kobe, Japan, I‐475–I‐484.
15.
Madsen, H. O., Skjong, K., and Kirkemo, F. (1987). “Probabilistic fatigue analysis of offshore structures.” Proc., ISO '87, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
16.
Miller, M. S., and Gallagher, J. P. (1981). “An analysis of several fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR) descriptions.” ASTM STP‐738, ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa. 205–251.
17.
Miner, M. A. (1945). “Cumulative damage in fatigue.” J. Appl. Mech., 12(3), A‐159–A‐164.
18.
Mohaupt, U. H., Rutns, D. J., Kalbfleisch, J. G., Vosikovsky, O., and Bell, R. (1987). Steel in marine structures, Elsevier, London, England.
19.
Ortiz, K., and Kiremedjian, A. (1985). “Stochastic model for fatigue crack growth rate.” Adv. in Aerosp. Struct. Engrg., AD‐09.
20.
Paris, P. C. (1964). “The fracture mechanics approach to fatigue.” Fatigue—an interdisciplinary approach, Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, N.Y., 107–132.
21.
Sarkani, S., Kihao, D. P., and Beach, J. E. (1992). “Non‐Gausian effects on fatigue of welded joints.” Proc., Struct. Cong. '92, San Antonio, Tex., 43–46.
22.
Schilling, C. G., et al. (1974). “Fatigue of welded steel bridge members under variable amplitude loadings.” Res. Result Dig. No. 60, Highway Research Board, Washington, D.C.
23.
Schueller, H. L., Nienstedt, J., Tsurui, A., and Tanaka, H. (1990). “Time‐variant structural reliability analysis using bivariate diffusive crack growth models.” Int. J. of Fatigue, 12(2), 83–89.
24.
Sobczyk, K., and Spencer Jr., B. F. (1992). Random fatigue: from data to theory. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, Calif.
25.
Veers, P. S. (1987). “Fatigue crack growth due to random loading.” Sandia Nat. Lab Rep. No. SAND 87‐2039, Sandia National Laboratory.
26.
Wirsching, P. H. (1984). “Fatigue reliability for offshore structures.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 110(10), 2,340–2,356.
27.
Wirsching, P. H., and Chen, Y. N. (1988). “Consideration of probability based fatigue design for marine structures.” Marine Struct., 1, 23–45.
28.
Wirsching, P. H., Ortiz, K., and Chen, Y. N. (1987). “Fracture mechanics fatigue model in a reliability format.” Proc., 6th Int. Symp. on OMAE, Houston, Tex.
29.
Wu, Y‐T, and Wirsching, P. H. (1984). “Advanced reliability method for fatigue analysis.” J. Engrg., Mech., ASCE, 110(4), 536–553.
30.
Yao, J. T. P., Kozin, F., Wen, Y. K., Yang, J. N., Schueller, G. I., and Ditlevson, O. (1986). “Stochastic fatigue, fracture and damage analysis.” Struct. Safety, 3(3), 231–267.
31.
Zhao, Z. (1991). “Reliability‐based fatigue analysis under random loading through NDT considering modeling updating for steel bridges,” MS thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz.
32.
Zhao, Z., Haldar, A., and Breen, F. L. (1994). “Fatigue‐reliability updating through inspections of steel bridges.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 120(5), 1624–1642.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 120Issue 5May 1994
Pages: 1608 - 1623

History

Received: Oct 20, 1992
Published online: May 1, 1994
Published in print: May 1994

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Zhengwei Zhao
Grad. Res. Asst., Dept. of Civ. Engrg. and Engrg. Mech., Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
Achintya Haldar, Fellow, ASCE
Prof., Dept. of Civ. Engrg. and Engrg. Mech., Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Florence L. Breen, Jr.
Chf. Struct. Engr., Metro Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, Atlanta, GA 30324

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share