Fatigue‐Reliability Updating through Inspections of Steel Bridges
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 120, Issue 5
Abstract
A reliability‐based fatigue‐damage‐evaluation procedure developed in the companion paper is extended in this paper to incorporate information from nondestructive inspections (NDI). Since inspections are required at regular intervals, the results from these inspections can be used for fatigue maintenance of steel bridges. The sensitivity and capability of some of the inspection methods, including ultrasonic inspection, are investigated. Inspection information is beneficial; however, it adds uncertainty to the fatigue‐evaluation process. The detectability and the accuracy are the two additional sources of uncertainty in the NDI. The uncertainties in them are quantified. The detection events are classified into three cases, no crack detection, crack detection but without size measurement, and crack detection with the crack‐size measurement. Using the information from inspections, the distributions of the basic random variables and the corresponding reliability index are updated. Using the information on the updated reliability index, a decision can be made on what to do next, in terms of reducing the next scheduled inspection interval, or whether to repair, replace, or do nothing. The procedure is explained with the help of an example. It is concluded that the inspection results can be used to maintain the fatigue‐damage integrity of steel bridges. Fatigue damage‐control curves are also proposed for everyday use.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
ASCE Committee on Fatigue and Fracture Reliability of the Committee on Structural Safety and Reliability of the Structural Division. (1982). “Fatigue reliability 1–4.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 108(1), 3–88.
2.
Barton, J. R., Kusenberger, F. N., and Brichak, J. R. (1973). “Development of a new system for detecting fatigue cracks in steel bridges.” Rep. No. FHWA‐RD‐73‐89, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
3.
Davidson, J. R. (1975). “Reliability after inspection.” Fatigue and Composite Materials, ASTM‐STP 569, 323–334.
4.
Engesvik, K. M. (1985). “Probabilistic evaluation of welded structures with respect to fatigue.” Div. of Struct. Engrg., SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway.
5.
Goranson, U. G., and Rogers, J. T. (1983). “Elements of damage tolerance verification.” Proc., 12th Symp. Int. Committee Aeronautical Fatigue (ICAF), 1–20.
6.
Guide specifications for fatigue of steel bridges. (1989). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
7.
Harris, D. O. (1977). “A means of assessing the effects of NDT on the reliability of cyclically loading structures.” Mat. Evaluation, 35(7), 57–69.
8.
Ichikawa, M. (1985). “A theoretical study of detection probability of nondestructive inspection.” Reliability Engrg., (10), 175–182.
9.
Jiao, G. Y. (1989). “Reliability analysis of crack growth under random loading considering model updating,” PhD thesis, Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
10.
Jiao, G. Y., and Moan, T. (1989). “Methods for fatigue reliability analysis considering updating through nondestructive inspections.” Rep. MK/R, No. 108/89, Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
11.
Leonard, B. E., and Gardner, C. G. (1973). “Ultrasonics.” Nondestructive Testing, NASA SP‐5113, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C.
12.
Madsen, H. O. (1985). “Random fatigue crack growth and inspection.” Proc., ICOSSAR'85, Kobe, Japan, I‐475–I‐484.
13.
Madsen, H. O. (1987). “Model updating in reliability theory.” Proc., ICASP5.
14.
Madsen, H. O., Krenik, S., and Lind, N. C. (1986). Methods of structural safety. Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.
15.
Nakatsuji, T., Kuramochi, M., Fujimori, T., Sato, K., and Toyoda, M. (1981). “Reliability of manual ultrasonic examination of welds in steel building construction (Part 2. Defect detection probability).” J. Japan Soc. Nondestructive Inspection, 30(4), 257–263 (in Japanese).
16.
Packman, P. F., Pearson, H. S., Owens, J. H., and Young, G. (1969). “Definition of fatigue crack through nondestructive testing.” J. of Mat., 4(3), 666–700.
17.
Silk, M. G., Stonehamm, A. M., and Temple, J. A. G. (1987). The reliability of nondestructive inspection. Adam Hilger, Bristol, England.
18.
Terada, S., and Takahashi, T. (1988). “Failure‐conditioned reliability index.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 114(4), 942–952.
19.
Urabe, N., and Yoshitake, A. (1981). “Reliability analysis in welded structures—case study for brittle fracture of high pressure gas storage tank.” High Pressure Technol., 19, 87–97.
20.
Yang, J. N., and Trapp, J. W. (1975). “Reliability analysis of fatigue‐critical aircraft structures under random loading and periodic inspections.” AFML‐TR‐75‐29, Air Force Materials Laboratory, Washington, D.C.
21.
Yee, B. G. (1976). “Assessment of NDE reliability data.” NASA‐CR‐134991, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C.
22.
Zhao, Z. (1991). “Reliability‐based fatigue analysis under random loading through NDT considering modeling updating for steel bridges,” MS thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
23.
Zhao, Z., Haldar, A., and Breen, F. L. (1993). “Fatigue evaluation of steel bridges.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 120(5), 1608–1623.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 120 • Issue 5 • May 1994
Pages: 1624 - 1642
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 20, 1992
Published online: May 1, 1994
Published in print: May 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.