State‐of‐the‐Art Report on Seismic Performance of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 120, Issue 1
Abstract
A large proportion of North America's older building inventory is of unreinforced masonry (URM), constructed in the absence of mandatory earthquake design requirements, and unquestionably recognized as the type of construction most vulnerable to earthquakes. Awareness of this seismic hazard is relatively new in eastern North America. In addition, the nature of the seismic risk and other engineering constraints there shed a new and different perspective on the problem. This state‐of‐the‐art paper on the seismic performance of URM buildings summarizes knowledge that has already gained some acceptance in parts of North America, and outlines current limitations. Concerns regarding the seismic performance of existing URM buildings are formulated in an eastern North American seismicity context. The various failure modes of URM buildings or components subjected to earthquake excitation are described, and, when possible, illustrated. The state‐of‐practice as required by North American building design codes and standards is summarized. A special analytical procedure of the Uniform Code for Building Conservation, largely inspired from the Agbabian, Barnes, and Kariotis (ABK) methodology for the mitigation of seismic hazards in existing buildings, is reviewed.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Adham, S. A. (1985). “The Borah Peak, Idaho earthquake of October 28, 1983—buildings and schools.” Earthquake Spectra, 2(1), 169–182.
2.
Armenia earthquake reconnaissance report. (1989). Earthquake Engrg. Res. Inst., El Cerrito, Calif.
3.
Bruneau, M. (1990). “Preliminary report of structural damage from the Loma Prieta (San Francisco) earthquake of 1989 and pertinence to Canadian structural engineering practice.” Can. J. Civ. Engrg., 17(2), 198–208.
4.
Building code requirements for masonry structures (ACI 530‐88/ASCE 5‐88). (1988). ASCE, New York, N.Y.
5.
CAN3‐S304‐M84, Masonry Design for Buildings. Can. Standard Assoc., Rexdale, Ontario, Canada.
6.
Cross, W., and Jones, N. P. (1991). “Historic buildings in the county of Santa Cruz and the Loma Prieta earthquake of 1989.” Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Repairs and Maintenance of Historical Buildings, Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, U.K., 133–144.
7.
Damage to unreinforced masonry buildings in the Loma Prieta earthquake of October 17, 1989. (1991). Calif. Seismic Safety Commission, Sacramento, Calif.
8.
Deppe, K. (1988). “Evaluation of strengthened and unstrengthened unreinforced masonry buildings in Los Angeles city.” Earthquake Spectra, 4(1), 157–180.
9.
DerKiureghian, A. (1990). “Observations from the Armenian earthquake of December 7, 1988.” Proc., 4th U.S. Nat. Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Inst., El Cerrito, Calif.
10.
Draft commentary to the structural engineers association of California and California building officials joint recommended unreinforced masonry building seismic safety provisions. (1990). California Seismic Safety Commission, Sacramento, Calif.
11.
Earthquake hazard mitigation of unreinforced masonry buildings built prior to 1934. (1981). Struct. Engrg. Assoc. of California, Sacramento, Calif.
12.
Earthquake hazard mitigation of unreinforced masonry buildings built prior to 1934—update. (1983). Struct. Engrg. Assoc. of Calif., Sacramento, Calif.
13.
Earthquake hazard mitigation of unreinforced pre‐1933 masonry buildings. (1986). Struct. Engrg. Assoc. of California, Sacramento, Calif.
14.
Elsesser, E., Naaseh, S., Walters, M., Sattary, V., and Whittaker, A. S. (1991). “Repair of five historic buildings damaged by the Loma Prieta earthquake.” Proc. Seismic Historic Building Conf., Western Chapter, Assoc. for Preservation Technology, San Francisco, pp. 4‐1, 4‐39.
15.
Esteva, L. (1988). “The Mexico earthquake of September 19, 1985—consequences, lessons, and impact on research and practice.” Earthquake Spectra, 4(3), 413–426.
16.
Evaluating the seismic resistance of existing buildings. (1987). Applied Technology Council Report ATC‐14, Redwood City, CA.
17.
Freeman, J. R. (1932). “Earthquake damage and earthquake insurance.” McGraw Hill, New York, N.Y.
18.
Gere, J. M., and Timoshenko, S. P. (1984). Mechanics of materials. Brooks/Cole Engrg. Div., Belmont, Calif.
19.
A Handbook for Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings (Preliminary). (1989). Applied technology council report ATC‐22, Appl. Technol. Council, Redwood City, Calif.
20.
Hart, G. C., Kariotis, J., and Noland, J. L. (1988). “Masonry building performance survey.” Earthquake Spectra, 4(1), 181–196.
21.
Kariotis, J. (1984). “Survey of unreinforced masonry buildings.” Reconnaissance report of the Coalinga, California, Earthquake of May 2, 1983, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Inst., Oakland, Calif., 145–156.
22.
Kariotis, J., Krakower, M., and Roselund, N. (1991). The engineers' view—Loma Prieta: historic buildings, earthquake damage and seismic strengthening. California Preservation Found., Oakland, Calif.
23.
Kariotis, J. (1991). “Preservation of historic buildings: coping with mandatory code compliance.” Proc. Seismic Historic Building Conf., Western Chapter Assoc. for Preservation Technology, San Francisco, 12‐1, 12‐9.
24.
Loma Prieta earthquake reconnaissance report: earthquake spectra, supplement to volume 6. (1990). Earthquake Engrg. Res. Inst., El Cerrito, Calif.
25.
Meli, R. (1989). “Seismic behavior of masonry buildings.” Lessons learned from the Mexico earthquake—Reducing earthquake hazards. Earthquake Eng. Res. Inst., Oakland, Calif., 181.
26.
“Methodology for mitigation of seismic hazards in existing unreinforced buildings: The methodology.” (1984). ABK‐TR‐08, Agbabian Assoc., El Segundo, CA.
27.
Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. (1982). Am. Nat. Standards Inst., New York, N.Y.
28.
Mitchell, D., Tinawi, R., and Law, T. (1989). “The 1988 Saguenay earthquake—a site visit report.” Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 1999.
29.
Moore, T. A., Kobzeff, J. H., Diri, J., and Arnold, C. (1988). “The Whittier Narrows, California earthquake of October 1, 1987—preliminary evaluation of the performance of strengthened unreinforced masonry buildings.” Earthquake Spectra, 4(1), 197–212.
30.
Muria‐Vila, D., and Meli, R. (1989). “Dynamic behavior of masonry structures.” Lessons learned from the Mexico earthquake—Reducing earthquake hazards, Earthquake Eng. Res. Inst., El Cerrito, Calif., 188—191.
31.
National Building Code of Canada, 1990. Nat. Res. Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
32.
NEHRP Recommended Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for New Buildings—Part 1: Provisions. Build. Seismic Safety Council, Washington, D.C.
33.
Newmark, N. M., and Hall, W. J. (1982). Earthquake spectra and design. Earthquake Engrg. Res. Inst., El Cerrito, Calif.
34.
Poland, C. D., Malley, J. O. (1989). “Recommended modifications to ATC‐14.” Nat. center for earthquake engineering research, technical report NCEER‐89‐0012, State Univ. of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, N.Y.
35.
Priestley, M. J. N. (1985). “Seismic behaviour of unreinforced masonry walls.” Bull. New Zealand Soc. for Earthquake Engrg., 18(2), 191–205.
36.
Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary. (1990). Struct. Engrg. Assoc. of California, Sacramento, Calif.
37.
Reitherman, R. (1985). “The Borah Peak, Idaho earthquake of October 28, 1983—performance of unreinforced masonry buildings in Mackay, Idaho.” Earthquake Spectra, 2(1), 205–224.
38.
Reitherman, R., Cuzner, G. J., Zsutty, T. C., and Smith, G. W. (1984). “Performance of unreinforced masonry buildings.” Reconnaissance report of the Coalinga, California earthquake of May 2, 1983, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Inst., El Cerrito, Calif., 113–144.
39.
Scholl, R. E., and Stratta, J. L. (1984). “Reconnaissance Report on the May 2, 1983 Earthquake in Coalinga, California.” Reconnaissance report of the Coalinga, California earthquake of May 2, 1983, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Inst., El Cerrito, Calif., 1–8.
40.
“Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings: Supporting Documentation.” (1989). Applied technology council report ATC‐22‐1, Appl. Technol. Council, Redwood City, Calif.
41.
Seminar on the new state wide earthquake hazard reduction code (1991 UCBC appendix chapter 1). Struct. Engrg. Assoc. of California, Sacramento, Calif.
42.
Shah, H. C., Gere, J. M., Krawinkler, H., Rojahn, C., and Zsutty, T. C. (1984). “An overview of damage to the Coalinga commercial district.” Reconnaissance report of the Coalinga, California, earthquake of May 2, 1983, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Inst., El Cerrito, Calif., 107–112.
43.
Swan, S. W., Miller, D. D., and Yanev, P. I. (1985). “The Morgan Hill earthquake of April 24, 1984—effects on industrial facilities, buildings, and other facilities.” Earthquake Spectra, 1(3), 457–567.
44.
Tena‐Colunga, A. (1992). “Seismic evaluation of unreinforced masonry structures with flexible diaphragms.” Earthquake Spectra, 8(2), 305–318.
45.
Uniform building code. (1991a). Int. Conf. of Build. Officials, Whittier, Calif.
46.
Uniform code for building conservation. (1991b). Int. Conf. of Build. Officials, Whittier, Calif.
47.
Zsutty, T. (1991). “Overview—ABK methodology.” Seminar on the new state wide earthquake hazard reduction code (1991 UCBC appendix chapter 1), Struct. Engrg. Assoc. of California, Los Angeles, Calif.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 120 • Issue 1 • January 1994
Pages: 230 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 13, 1992
Published online: Jan 1, 1994
Published in print: Jan 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.