Design of Notched Wood Beams
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 118, Issue 9
Abstract
Current design methods for notched wood beams, based on either notch‐factor or linear‐elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) approaches, are reviewed and compared with an alternative equation based on critical fillet hoop stress (CFHS) theory and with experimental data. The CFHS and LEFM equations are shown to account for the observed effects of notch corner location, load distribution, beam height, and fractional notch depth. The notch‐factor equation, currently the basis for U.S. design practice, does not reflect the effects of beam height and notch corner location on strength. The CFHS equation implicitly accounts for the effect of beam span‐to‐depth ratio, and was developed from combined results of finite element and statistical analyses and an extensive experimental program. Other potential advantages of the CFHS equation are: (1) Its ability to account for stress relief caused by rounding the notch; (2) its ability to account for Saint‐Venant end effects for notches located at, or close to, the support; and (3) its use of a notched beam material parameter κ that is easily determined by simple tests.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Australian standard 1720.1‐1988: Australian timber structures code, part 1—design methods. (1988). Standards Association of Australia, Sydney, Australia.
2.
Bostrom, L. (1990). “Application of fracture mechanics to timber structures.” State‐of‐the‐art report Part 2. Proc., RILEM TC 110‐TFM/IUFRO 5.02 Joint session, International Union of Forest Research Organizations, Vienna, Austria.
3.
Breyer, D. E. (1988). Design of wood structures. McGraw‐Hill, New York, N.Y.
4.
Cook, R. D., and Young, W. C. (1985). Advanced mechanics of materials. Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, N.Y.
5.
Crubile, P., Ehlbeck, J., Brüninghoff, H., Larsen, H. J., and Sunley, J. (1988). EUROCODE 5: Common unified rules for timber structures. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium.
6.
Engineering design in wood (limit states design). (1990). CAN3‐086.1‐M89, Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, Ontario, Canada.
7.
Foliente, G. C. (1989). “Predicting strength of wood beams with tension end notches,” Master's thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Va.
8.
Foliente, G. C., and McLain, T. E. (1992). “Strength of end‐notched wood beams: A critical fillet hoop stress approach.” Wood Fib. Sci., 24(2), 168–180.
9.
Gerhardt, T. D. (1984a). “Strength and stiffness analysis of notched green oak pallet stringers.” Res. Paper FPL 452, U.S. Forest Service, Madison, Wis.
10.
Gerhardt, T. D. (1984b). “A hybrid/finite element approach for stress analysis of notched anistropic materials.” J. Appl. Mech., 51(Dec.), 804–810.
11.
Gustafsson, P. J. (1988). “A study of strength of notched beams.” Paper 21‐10‐1, Proc. CIB‐W18A meeting, International Council for Building Research Studies and Documentation, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
12.
Gustafsson, P. J. (1991). “EUROCODE 5 draft design criterion for notched beams.” Proc. 1991 Int. Timber Engineering Conf., Timber Research and Development Association, Buckinghamshire, U.K.
13.
Larsen, H. J. (1975). “The design of timber beams.” CIB‐W18A meeting, International Council for Building Research Studies and Documentation, Timber structures, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
14.
Larsen, H. J., and Gustafsson, P. J. (1989). “Design of end notched beams.” Paper 22‐10‐1, Proc. CIB‐W18A meeting, International Council for Building Studies and Documentation, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
15.
Leicester, R. H. (1971). “Some aspects of stress fields at sharp notches in orthotropic materials‐I.” Tech. Paper No. 57, Division of Forest Products, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Melbourne, Australia.
16.
Leicester, R. H. (1973). “Effect of size on the strength of structures.” Tech. Paper No. 71, Division of Forest Products, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organizaton, Melbourne, Australia.
17.
Leicester, R. H., and Poynter, W. G. (1979). “On the design strength of notched beams.” Proc. 19th Forest Products Res. Conf., Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Melbourne, Australia.
18.
Mettem, C. J. (1986). Structural timber design and technology. Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex, England.
19.
Moehler, K., and Mistier, M. L. (1978). “Investigations on the influence of notching at wood beam supports on bending strength.” Rapport, Lehrstuhl fuer Ingenieurholzbau und Baukonstruktionen, Universitaet Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany (in German).
20.
Murphy, J. F. (1978). “Using fracture mechanics to predict failure in notched wood beams.” Proc. First Int. Conf. Wood Fracture, Aug., Forintek Canada Corp., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 159–173.
21.
Murphy, J. F. (1986). “Strength and stiffness reduction of large notched beams.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 112(9), 1989–2000.
22.
National design specification for wood construction. (1986). National Forest Products Association, Washington, D.C.
23.
Patton‐Mallory, M., and Cramer, S. M. (1987). “Fracture mechanics: a tool for predicting wood component strength.” For. Prod. J., 37(718), 39–47.
24.
Reeves, J. R. (1973). “The effect of stringer design and leading‐edge design on the strength characteristics of wooden pallets,” Master's thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Va.
25.
Scholten, J. A. (1935). “Rounding notches makes stronger joists.” American Lumberman, Jan., 46.
26.
Stieda, C. K. A. (1966). “Stress concentrations around holes and notches and their effect on the strength of wood beams.” J. Materials, 1(3), 560–582.
27.
Sugiyama, H., and Maeda, K. (1990). “Bending test on dimension lumber with a notch and comments on the present Japanese design method I. Test results on the bending strength of Hem‐fir 2 by 6's with a notch.” J. Japan Wood Res. Soc., 36(6), 491–496.
28.
Taylor, R. L. (1977). “Computer procedures for finite element analysis.” The finite element method. O. C. Zienkiewicz, ed., McGraw‐Hill, New York, N.Y., 677–757.
29.
Timber construction manual. (1985). American Institute of Timber Construction, John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y.
30.
Timber structure design specifications and commentary. (1988). Architectural Institute of Japan, Maruzen Co., Tokyo, Japan.
31.
Walsh, P. F. (1972). “Linear fracture mechanics in orthotropic materials.” Engrg. Fract. Mech., 4, 533–541.
32.
Wood handbook: Wood as an engineering material. (1987). USDA Handbook No. 72, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
33.
Zalph, B. L. (1989). “Predicting the strength of notched wood beams,” Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Va.
34.
Zalph, B. L., and McLain, T. E. (1992). “Strength of wood beams with filleted interior notches: a new model.” Wood Fib. Sci., 24(2), 204–215.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 118 • Issue 9 • September 1992
Pages: 2407 - 2420
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 ASCE.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1992
Published in print: Sep 1992
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.