Reinforcement Anchorage Slip under Monotonic Loading
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 118, Issue 9
Abstract
An analytical procedure is proposed for the force‐deformation relationship of a reinforcing bar anchored in concrete. The procedure leads to computation of deformations in two parts, as extension and slippage. The extension of reinforcement is determined by establishing inelastic strain distribution along the embedment length of the bar. Constant average bond along the elastic length and frictional bond over the plastic length are assumed. The rigid body slippage of the bar is computed when the bar is stressed to the far end. An increase in the elastic bond stress is considered to develop the bar force with the available anchorage length. The elastic bond at the far end of the bar is used with a previously derived local bond‐slip model to obtain the rigid body slippage of the bar. The procedure is applied to straight as well as hooked bars, subjected to pull, and simultaneous push and pull, simulating exterior and interior joints. The results are verified against a large volume of experimental data reported in the literature.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Ciampi, V., Eligehausen, R., Bertero, V. V., and Popov, E. P. (1981). “Analytical model for deformed bar bond under generalized excitations.” IABSE Colloquium, Advanced Mechanics of Reinforced Concrete, Int. Association of Bridge and Struct. Engrg., Delft, Netherlands, 53–67.
2.
Ciampi, V., Eligehausen, R., Bertero, V. V., and Popov, E. P. (1982). “Analytical model for concrete anchorage of reinforcing bar under generalized excitation.” Report No. 82/23, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif., Ill.
3.
Eligehausen, R., Popov, E. P., and Bertero, V. V. (1983). “Local bond stress‐slip relationship of a deformed bar under generalized excitation.” Report No. 83/23, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif., 169.
4.
Filippou, F. C. (1985). “A simple model for reinforcing bar anchorage under cyclic excitations.” Report No. EERC 85/05, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif., 61.
5.
Filippou, F. C., Popov, E. P., and Bertero, V. V. (1983). “Effect of bond deterioration on hysteretic behaviour of reinforced concrete joints.” Report No. EERC 83/19, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif., 184.
6.
Goto, Y. (1971). “Cracks formed in concrete around tension bars.” ACI J., 68(4), 244–251.
7.
Hawkins, N. M., Lin, I., and Ueda, T. (1987). “Anchorage of reinforcing bars for seismic forces.” ACI Struct. J., 84(5), 407–418.
8.
Ismail, H., and Jirsa, J. O. (1972). “Behavior of anchored bars under cyclic overloads producing inelastic strains.” ACI J., 69(7), 443–438.
9.
Lutz, L. A., and Gergely, P. (1967). “Mechanics of bond and slip of deformed bars in concrete.” ACI J., 64(11), 711–721.
10.
Morita, S., and Kaku, T. (1984). “Slippage of reinforcement in beam‐column joint of reinforced concrete framed.” Proc. 8th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Prentice‐Hall, 477–484.
11.
Mukaddam, M., and Kaski, M. B. (1986). “Reinforced concrete joints under cyclic loading.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 112(4), 937–954.
12.
Otani, S., Sozen, M. (1972). “Behavior of multistory reinforced concrete frames during earthquakes.” Struct. Res. Series No. 392, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, Ill., 551.
13.
PCI design handbook—Precast and prestressed concrete. (1985). Prestressed Concr. Inst., Chicago, Ill., 6‐6–6‐8.
14.
Pochanart, S., and Harmon, T. (1989). “Bond‐slip model for generalized excitation including fatigue.” ACI Mater. J., 86(5), 465–474.
15.
Russo, G., Zingone, G., and Ramano, F. (1990). “Analytical solution for bond‐slip of reinforcing bars in RC joints.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 116(2), 336–355.
16.
Saatcioglu, M., Alsiwat, J. M., and Ozcebe, G. (1992). “Hysteretic behavior of anchorage slip in R/C members.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 118(9), 2439–2458.
17.
Shaikh, A., and Yi, W. (1985). “In place strength of welded headed studs,” PCI J., 30(21), 56–81.
18.
Soroushian, P., and Choi, K.‐B. (1989). “Local bond of deformed bars with different diameters in confined concrete.” ACI Struct. J., 86(2), 217–222.
19.
Soroushian, P., and Choi, K. (1991). “Analytical evaluation of straight bar anchorage in exterior joints.” ACI Struct. J., 88(2), 161–168.
20.
Soroushian, P., Obaseki, K., Nagi, M., and Rojas, M. (1988). “Pullout behaviour of hooked bars in exterior beam‐column connections.” ACI Struct. J., 85(3), 269–276.
21.
Suggested development, splices, and standard hook provisions for deformed bars in tension. (1979). American Concr. Inst., Detroit, Mich.
22.
Ueda, T., Lin, I., and Hawkins, N. M. (1986). “Beam bars anchorage in exterior column‐beam connections.” ACI Struct. J., 83(3), 412–422.
23.
Viwathanatepa, S., Popov, E. P., and Bertero, V. V. (1979). “Effects of generalized loadings on bond of reinforcing bars embedded in confined concrete blocks.” Report No. EERC 79‐22, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif., 303.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 118 • Issue 9 • September 1992
Pages: 2421 - 2438
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 ASCE.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1992
Published in print: Sep 1992
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.