General Strategy for Structural Systems Reliability Analysis
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 117, Issue 3
Abstract
A general strategy for estimating the failure probability of the class of structural systems for which each deterministic structural analysis is expensive is proposed. The strategy is interactive, sequential, and iterative. It relies upon the user to interpret and generate information about the system through the use of appropriate techniques such as directed experimental design, sampling techniques, response surface, and first‐ and second‐order reliability methods. In the strategy, one tries to obtain increasingly accurate representations of the more important failure regions and use these representations to arrive at an estimate of the system failure probability. The goal is to obtain an estimate with the minimum number of structural analyses. There are no concrete steps in the strategy. The steps taken for each problem are decided by the user. The strategy was applied to two examples. The purpose of the first example, which is a simple truss structure with brittle components subjected to a static load, is to demonstrate the strategy in greater detail. In the second example, a first estimate of the probability of failure of an offshore structure was obtained using the strategy.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bjerager, P. (1988). “Probability integration by directional simulation.” J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 114(8), 1285–1302.
2.
Chryssanthopoulos, M., Baker, M. J., and Dowling, P. J. (1987). “Reliability‐based design of stringer‐stiffened cylinders under axial compression.” Proc., 6th Int. Offshore Mech. and Arctic Engrg. Symp., ASME, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, N.Y., II, 403–411.
3.
Cochran, W. G., and Cox, G. M. (1964). Experimental designs. 2nd Ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
4.
Ditlevsen, O., and Bjerager, P. (1984). “Reliability of highly redundant plastic systems.” J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 110(5), 671–693.
5.
Draper, N. R., and Smith, H. (1981). Applied regression analysis, 2nd Ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
6.
Fu, G., and Moses, F. (1987). “A sampling distribution for system reliability application.” Proc., 1st IFIP WG 7.5 Working Conf. on Reliability and Optimization of Struct. Systems, International Federation for Information Processing Working Group, Aalborg, Denmark, 141–155.
7.
Guenard, Y. F. (1984). “Application of system reliability analysis to offshore structures.” Report No. RMS‐1, Reliability of Marine Structures Program, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
8.
Ibrahim, Y. (1988). “A general strategy for structural systems reliability analysis: Development and application,” thesis presented to Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
9.
Karamchandani, A. (1987). “Structural system reliability analysis methods: A report to the joint industry.” Report No. RMS‐2, Reliability of Marine Structures Program, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
10.
Madsen, H. O., Krenk, S., and Lind, N. C. (1986). Methods of structural safety. Prentice‐Hall, Inc., N.J.
11.
Melchers, R. E. (1984). “Efficient Monte‐Carlo probability integration.” Report No. 7/1984, Monash Univ., Australia.
12.
Melchers, R. E., and Tang, L. K. (1984). “Dominant failure modes in stochastic structural systems.” Struct. Safety, 2(2), 127–143.
13.
Moses, F., and Rashedi, M. R. (1983). “The application of system reliability to structural safety.” Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Soil and Struct. Engrg., Florence, Italy.
14.
Murotsu, Y., Okada, H., Niwa, K., and Miwa, S. (1980). “Reliability analysis of truss structures by using matrix method.” Trans. ASME, J. Mech. Design, 102(4), 749–756.
15.
Myers, R. (1971). “Response surface methodology.” Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston, Mass.
16.
Nordal, H., Cornell, C. A., and Karamchandani, A. (1987). “A structural systems reliability case study of an eight‐leg steel jacket offshore production platform.” Proc. of Marine Struct. Reliability Symp., Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers (SNAME), Arlington, Va., 193–216.
17.
Nordal, H., Cornell, C. A., and Karamchandani, A. (1988). “A systems reliability case study of an eight‐leg jacket platform.” Report No. RMS‐3, Reliability of Marine Structures Program, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
18.
Rackwitz, R., and Fiessler, B. (1978). “Structural reliability under combined random load sequences.” Computers and Struct., 9, 489–494.
19.
Rubinstein, R. Y. (1981). Simulation and the Monte Carlo method. John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
20.
Schuëller, G. I., and Stix, R. (1987). “A critical appraisal of methods to determine failure probabilities.” Struct. Safety, 4(4), 293–309.
21.
Thoft‐Christensen, P., and Sorensen, J. D. (1982). “Calculation of failure probabilities of ductile structures by the β‐unzipping method.” Report 8208, Institute of Building Technology and Structural Engineering, Aalborg University Centre, Aalborg, Denmark.
22.
Veneziano, D., Casciati, F., and Faravelli, L. (1983). “Method of seismic fragility for complicated systems.” 2nd. CSNI Specialist Meeting on Probabilistic Methods in Seismic Risk Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants, Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations, Livermore, Calif., 67–88.
23.
Wu, Y.‐T., and Wirsching, P. H. (1984). “Advanced reliability method for fatigue analysis.” J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 110(4), 536–553.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 117 • Issue 3 • March 1991
Pages: 789 - 807
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 ASCE.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1991
Published in print: Mar 1991
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.