Response of Dams to Earthquakes Including Effects of Sediments
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 116, Issue 11
Abstract
Using a technique based on the boundary element method, results are obtained for two‐dimensional dam‐water‐sediments‐foundation systems subjected to ground motion. Both deep‐stratum and half‐space idealizations of the foundation are considered. The results confirm the findings of previous investigations with respect to dam‐water and dam‐foundation interactions. However, they are in contrast with some of the results of an earlier study obtained using the so‐called “wave reflection coefficient” approach when considering dam‐water‐foundation systems. Specifically, in the case of a half‐space foundation and a full reservoir, the “wave reflection coefficient” approach leads to substantial underestimation (approximately 24% for the system considered) of the peak value of the crest horizontal acceleration due to time‐harmonic horizontal ground motion. Apparently, this is due to the excessive damping introduced into the dam‐water‐foundation system by the absorbing boundary condition imposed on the bottom of the reservoir in the “wave reflection coefficient” approach.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Cheng, A. H.‐D. (1986). “Effect of sediment on earthquake‐induced reservoir hydrodynamic response.” J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 112(7), 654–665.
2.
Chopra, A. K. (1987). “Earthquake analysis, design, and safety evaluation of concrete dams.” Proc., Fifth Canadian Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 39–62.
3.
Dominguez, J. (1978a). “Dynamic stiffness of rectangular foundations.” Research Report R78‐20, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
4.
Dominguez, J. (1978b). “Response of embedded foundations to travelling waves.” Research Report R78‐24, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
5.
Dominguez, J., and Abascal, R. (1987). “Dynamics of foundations.” Topics in boundary element research, C. A. Brebbia, ed., Springer‐Verlag, West Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany.
6.
Fenves, G., and Chopra, A. K. (1984). “Earthquake analysis and response of concrete gravity dams.” Report No. UCB/EERC‐84/10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, Calif.
7.
Lotfi, V. (1986). “Analysis of the response of dams to earthquakes.” Geotechnical Engineering Report GR86‐2, Dept. of Civil Engineering, The University of Texas, Austin, Tex.
8.
Lotfi, V., Roesset, I. M., and Tassoulas, J. L. (1987). “A technique for the analysis oh on of the response of dams to earthquakes.” Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dyn., 15, 463–490.
9.
Medina, F. (1987). “Analisis de la respuesta sismica de presas incluyendo effectos de interaccion suelo‐agua‐estructura.” Report, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain (in Spanish).
10.
Medina, F., and Dominguez, J. (1989). “Boundary elements for the analysis of the seismic response of dams including dam‐water‐foundation interaction effects. I.” Engrg. Anal., 6(3), 152–157.
11.
Stokoe, K. H. (1984). Private communication.
12.
Tassoulas, J. L. (1989). “Dynamic soil‐structure interaction.” Boundary element methods in structural analysis, D. E. Beskos, ed., American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, N.Y., 273–308.
13.
Taylor, R. L., Beresford, P. J., and Wilson, E. L. (1976). “A non‐conforming element for stress analysis.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 10, 1211–1219.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 ASCE.
History
Published online: Nov 1, 1990
Published in print: Nov 1990
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.