Strength‐Grading Method for Wood Poles
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 116, Issue 11
Abstract
Based on a nondestructive evaluation (NDE) system, a methodology is described to develop a strength‐grading method for wood utility poles. Considerations are given for both economics and engineering design aspects. The proposed NDE‐based grading system is calibrated to provide at least the same production economic benefit and structural reliability as currently exist with visually graded poles. However, even with these limitations, an additional reliability and hence an additional economic benefit is derived by enabling a better matching of pole strength with specific design loads. Use of currently rejected poles is possible with the proposed method. The proposed grading system retains the size classification concept currently used by the American National Standard Institute, but would upgrade or downgrade individual poles according to their NDE‐predicted strengths. Five strength grades are proposed that are calibrated to recently obtained bending strength data for transmission‐size Douglas fir poles.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
American national standard specifications and dimensions for wood poles. (1987). ANSI 05.1‐1979, Amer. Nat. Standards Inst., New York, N.Y.
2.
American standard specifications and dimensions for wood poles. (1948). ASA 05el‐1948, Amer. Standards Assoc., New York, N.Y.
3.
American standard specifications and dimensions for wood poles. (1963). ASA 05.1‐1963, Amer. Standards Assoc., New York, N.Y.
4.
American tentative standard specification for southern pine poles and American standard dimensions for Southern Pine poles. (1931). ASA 05.1‐1931, Amer. Standards Assoc., New York, N.Y.
5.
Anthony, R. W. (1986). “Experimental data for the tension behavior of Douglas‐fir with defects.” Thesis presented to Colorado State University, at Fort Collins, Colo., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
6.
Behr, E. A., Radcliffe, B. M., and Wilkins, K. O. (1965). “Strength of plantation grown and second growth Red pine poles.” Michigan Quarterly Bulletin, 48(2), 296–319.
7.
Bodig, J., Anthony, R. W., and Goodman, J. R. (1985). “Nondestructive evaluation of wood utility poles—A status report.” Electric Power Res. Inst., Palo Alto, Calif.
8.
Bodig, J. (1986). “Effect of knots on pole strength.” Final Report Submitted to Western Wood Preservers Inst., Engrg. Data Mgmt., Fort Collins, Colo.
9.
Bodig, J., et al. (1986). “Wood pole properties—Review and recommendations for design resistance data, vol. 2: Douglas‐fir data.” EL‐4109, Electric Power Res. Inst., Palo Alto, Calif.
10.
Bodig, J., and Goodman, J. R. (1986). “Wood pole properties—Review and recommendations for design resistance data, vol. 3: Western Red cedar.” EL‐4109. Electric Power Res. Inst., Palo Alto, Calif.
11.
Bodig, J., and Anthony, R. W. (1987). “Second generation nondestructive evaluation of wood utility poles.” Electric Power Res. Inst., Palo Alto, Calif.
12.
Coetzee, P. F. (1978). “The influence of different factors on bending strength of Pinus carariensis and Pinus pinaster poles.” South African Forestry J., 105.
13.
Dashiell, J. A. (1985). “Effect of growth characteristics on the bending strength of wood poles.” Thesis presented to Colorado State Univ., at Fort Collins, Colo., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
14.
Gerhards, C. C. (1982). “Longitudinal stress waves for lumber stress grading—Factors affecting applications: State of the art.” Forest Products J., 32(2), 20–25.
15.
Hearmon, R. F. S. (1966). “Theory of the vibration testing of wood.” Forest Products J., 16(8), 29–40.
16.
James, W. L. (1961). “Effect of temperature and moisture content on internal friction and speed of sound in Douglas fir.” Forest Products J., 11(9), 383–390.
17.
Lowery, D. P., and Erickson, E. C. O. (1967). “The effect of spiral grain on pole twist and bending strength.” U.S. Forest Service Res. Paper INT‐35, Ogden, Utah.
18.
National electric safety code. (1986). ANSI C2, Amer. Nat. Standards Inst., Inst. of Electrical and Electronics Engrg., New York, N.Y.
19.
Pentoney, R. E. (1965). “Effect of moisture content and grain angle on the internal friction of wood.” Composite Wood, Forest Products Lab., 2, 131–136.
20.
Pugel, A. D. (1980). “Evaluation of selected mechanical properties of coniferous knotwood.” Thesis presented to Colorado State University, at Fort Collins, Colo., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
21.
Tuomi, R. L., et al. (1979). “Bending strength of large Alaskan Sitka spruce and Western hemlock log bridge stringers.” Research Paper FPL 341, Forest Products Lab., U.S.D.A. Forest Service.
22.
Wang, Y. (1987). “Stress grading of wood utility poles.” Thesis presented to Colorado State University, at Fort Collins, Colo., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
23.
Wood, L. W., Erickson, E. C. O., and Dohr, A. W. (1960). “Strength and related properties of wood poles.” Special Tech. Pub. 295, Amer. Soc. for Testing and Matls.
24.
Wood, L. W., and Markwardt, L. J. (1965). “Derivation of fiber stress values of wood poles.” Forest Products Lab. Res. Paper FPL 39, U.S.D.A. Forest Service.
25.
Zandbergs, J. G. (1985). “Finite element fracture prediction for orthotropic, inhomogeneous materials.” Thesis presented to the Colorado State University, at Fort Collins, Colo., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 ASCE.
History
Published online: Nov 1, 1990
Published in print: Nov 1990
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.