Evaluation of Seismic Design Procedures for Highway Bridges
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 114, Issue 7
Abstract
The seismic response of highway bridges designed by Cal‐Trans specifications in use before and after the 1971 San Fernando earthquake and hypothetical bridges designed by the latest American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) specifications are evaluated. A computer code to analyze the dynamic response of bridges to a uniform base acceleration is developed with particular emphasis on modeling the overall nonlinear behavior of the piers. A spectrum‐compatible, artificial accelerogram is derived as a base input for the bridges. The degree of damage expected for the piers is evaluated by the use of a damage index derived from tests on reinforced concrete specimens. The results found that for bridges designed prior to 1971, the piers are in danger of collapse if the moments exceed the yield moments due to the limited amount of transverse reinforcing used. The bridges designed after 1971 and by the current specifications showed good calculated behavior of the piers. The method currently used for calculating the design force on the abutment, however, was unconservative in many cases.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Barenberg, M. E., and Foutch, D. A. (1986). “Inelastic response and damage assessment of reinforced concrete highway bridges subjected to seismic loadings.” Civil Engineering Studies SRS No. 528, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign, Urbana, Ill.
2.
Bridge design specifications manual. (1986). California Dept. of Transportation, Sacramento, Calif.
3.
Douglas, B. M., and Reid, W. H. (1982). “Dynamic tests and system identification of bridges.” J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 108(10), 2295–2312.
4.
Elliot, A. L., and Nagai, I. (1973). “Earthquake damage to freeway bridges.” San Fernando, California, earthquake of February 9, 1971, vol. 2, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D.C., 201–234.
5.
Gates, J., and Smith, M. (1982). “Verification dynamic modeling methods by prototype excitation.” Report No. FHWA/CA/SD‐82/07, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
6.
Guide specifications for seismic design of highway bridges. (1983). American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
7.
Hood, G. A., and Mancarti, G. D. (1982). “CalTrans earthquake Design Criteria (commentary).” No. 15‐10, memo to designers, California Dept. of Transportation, Sacramento, Calif.
8.
Hwang, T.‐H. (1982). “Effect of variation in load history on cyclic response of concrete ftexural members,” thesis presented to the Univ. of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign, Urbana, Ill., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
9.
Imbsen, R. A., Nutt, R. V., and Penzien, J. (1978). “Seismic response of bridges—case studies.” Report No. 78‐14, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
10.
Lam, I., and Martin, G. (1986a). “Seismic design of highway bridge foundations, vol. I, executive summary.” Report No. FHWA/RD‐86/101, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, Va.
11.
Lam, I., and Martin, G. (1986b). “Seismic design of highway bridge foundations, vol. II, design procedures and guidelines.” Report No. FHWA/RD‐86/102, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, Va.
12.
Lam, I., and Martin, G. (1986c). “Seismic design of highway bridge foundations, vol. III, example problems and sensitivity studies.” Report No. FHWA/RD‐86/103, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, Va.
13.
Levy, S., and Wilkinson, J. P. D. (1976). “Generation of artificial time histories, rich in all frequencies, from given response spectra.” Nuclear Engrg. and Design, 38, 241–251.
14.
Otani, S., and Sozen, M. A. (1972). “Behavior of multistory reinforced concrete frames during earthquakes.” Civil Engineering Studies SRS No. 392, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign, Urbana, Ill.
15.
Park, Y.‐J., and Ang, A. H.‐S. (1985). “Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 111(4), 722–739.
16.
Park, Y.‐J., Ang, A. H.‐S., and Wen, Y. K. (1985). “Seismic damage analysis of reinforced concrete buildings.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 111(4), 740–757.
17.
Priestley, M. J. N., and Park, R. (1984). “Strength and ductility of bridge substructures.” Research Report 84‐20, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
18.
Saiidi, M., and Sozen, M. A. (1979). “Simple and complex models for non‐linear seismic response of reinforced concrete structures.” Civil Engineering Studies SRS No. 465, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign, Urbana, Ill., Aug.
19.
Seed, H. B., Ugas, C., and Lysmer, J. (1976). “Site‐dependent spectra for earthquake resistant design.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. of Am., 66(1), 221–244.
20.
“Seismic design guidelines for highway bridges.” (1981). ATC‐6, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, Calif.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 114 • Issue 7 • July 1988
Pages: 1588 - 1605
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1988
Published in print: Jul 1988
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.