Estimation of Mean Flow Velocity in Ice‐Covered Channels
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 120, Issue 12
Abstract
Point‐measurement methods for estimating the mean velocity of vertical distributions of streamwise velocity in ice‐covered channels are evaluated in this paper. The evaluation uses profiles generated numerically, based on a two‐power law description of vertical distribution of streamwise velocity. The two‐power law simplifies into the well‐known power‐law expression for open‐water velocity profiles. Its validity was verified using measured velocity profiles obtained from rivers and a laboratory flume. The profiles are representative of flows subject to various combinations of bed and ice‐cover conditions. Values of estimation bias (the percent error in estimating average velocity from a few point measurements instead of integrating over the entire vertical velocity profile) were determined for several point‐measurement methods, including those currently used by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) and the Water Survey of Canada, and proposed new methods. The systematic variation of bias values with ice‐cover and bed‐resistance conditions was also determined. The method with the least overall bias is the so‐called usual two‐point method, in which velocity measurements taken at 0.2 and 0.8 of flow depth are averaged to obtain an estimate of mean velocity. This method produces a remarkably small bias; its maximum value is close to 2%. Estimation accuracy is enhanced if a coefficient of 0.98 is applied to the two‐point method.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Alford, M. E., and Carmack, E. C. (1988). “Observations on ice cover and stream‐flow in the Yukon River near Whitehorse during 1985/86. NHRI Paper No. 40, Inland Waters Div. (IWD) Scientific Series No. 162, Nat. Hydro. Res. Inst., Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
2.
Barrows, H. K., and Horton, R. E. (1907). “Determination of streamflow during the frozen season.” Water Supply and Irrig. Paper No. 187, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Washington, D.C.
3.
Carter, R. W., and Anderson, I. E. (1963). “Accuracy of current meter measurements.” J. Hydr. Engrg., ASCE, 89(4), 105–115.
4.
Herschy, R. W. (1975). “The accuracy of existing and new methods of river gauging,” PhD thesis, Dept. of Geography, Univ. of Reading, Berkshire, England.
5.
Hoyt, W. G. (1913). “The effects of ice on streamflow.” Water Supply Paper No. 337, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Washington, D.C.
6.
Lau, Y. L. (1982). “Velocity distributions under floating ice covers.” Can. J. Civ. Engrg., Ottawa, Canada, 9(1), 76–83.
7.
“Liquid flow measurement in open channels—vocabulary and symbols.” (1978). Tech. Rep. 772, International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland.
8.
Melcher, N. B., and Walker, J. F. (1990). “Evaluation of selected methods for determining streamflow during periods of ice effect.” Water Supply Paper No. 2378, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Washington, D.C.
9.
Pardoe, W. S. (1916). “Methods of stream gaging.” Engrg. News, Vol. 75.
10.
Pelletier, P. M. (1988a). “Techniques used by water survey of Canada for measurement and computation of streamflow under ice conditions.” Proc., 5th Workshop on Hydr. of River Ice/Ice Jams, Manitoba Water Resour. Branch, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
11.
Pelletier, P. M. (1988b). “Uncertainties in the single determination of river discharge: a literature review.” Can. J. Civ. Engrg., Ottawa, Canada, 15(5), 834–850.
12.
Rantz, S. E. et al. (1982). “Measurement and Computation of Streamflow.” Water Supply Paper No. 2175: Vols. 1 and 2, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Washington, D.C.
13.
Rouse, H. (1950). Engineering hydraulics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y., 222–224.
14.
Teal, M. J., and Ettema, R. (1993). “Estimation of mean velocity for ice‐affected stream fow.” IIHR Rep. No. 390, Iowa Inst. of Hydr. Res. (IIHR), Iowa City, Iowa.
15.
Tsai, W. F., and Ettema, R. (1994). “Modified eddy viscosity model in fully developed asymmetric channel flows.” J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 120(2), 720–732.
16.
Walker, J. F. (1991). “Accuracy of selected techniques for estimating ice‐affected streamflow.” J. Hydr. Engrg., ASCE, 117(6), 697–712.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 120 • Issue 12 • December 1994
Pages: 1385 - 1400
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 13, 1993
Published online: Dec 1, 1994
Published in print: Dec 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.