Wake Vortex Scour at Bridge Piers
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 117, Issue 7
Abstract
At most bridges, wake vortex scour is insignificant and confluence scour does not exist. In clear‐water rivers flowing on fine sand, these two forms of local scour can be very large. The deep scour holes downstream from the large circular piers (10 and 15 m in diameter) at the Tahrir and Imbaba Bridges over the Nile River in Cairo, Egypt were produced by the conflicting velocity fields at the intersection of the wake vortex streams from adjacent piers. The depths of scour due to these wake vortices are now 8 to 11 m where the normal depth of flow is approximately 8 m. Confluence scour where the main and side channel join upstream from the Imbaba Bridge was 9 m in 1981 and 1987 and was aligned with the bisector of the intersection angle of the two channels. These depths of scour can be considered nearly clear‐water scour as the bridges are in the backwater of the Delta Barrages, the velocity is less than 1 m/s, and sediment transport is very low.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Baker, C. J. (1980). “Theoretical approach to prediction of local scour around bridge piers.” J. Hydr. Res., 18(1), 1–12.
2.
Best, J. L. (1987). “Flow dynamics at river channel confluences: Implications for sediment transport and bed morphology.” Recent developments in fluvial sedimentology, F. G. Ethridge, R. M. Flores, and M. D. Harvey, eds., Special Publ. Soc. Econ. Paleont. Miner., Tulsa, Oklahoma, 27–35.
3.
Best, J. L. (1988). “Sediment transport and bed morphology at river channel confluences.” Sedimentology, 35(3), 481–498.
4.
Breusers, H. N. C., Nicollet, G., and Shen, H. W. (1977). “Local scour around cylindrical piers.” J. Hydr. Res., 15(3), 211–252.
5.
Carstens, T., and Sharma, H. R. (1975). “Local scour around large obstructions.” Proc. Int. Assoc. Hydr. Res., 16th Congress, Int. Association of Hydr. Res. (IAHR), Delfth, The Netherlands, 251–262.
6.
Chabert, J., and Engeldinger, P. (1956). “Etude des affouillements autour des piles des ponts.” Laboratoire National d'Hydraulique, Chatou, France.
7.
Chang, F. F. M. (1980). “Scour at bridge piers—Field data from Louisiana files.” Report No. FHWA‐RD‐79–105, U.S. Dept. of Transp., Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
8.
Charbonneau, A. L. (1973). Hydraulic model study of scour in gravel‐bed rivers. Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Ltd., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
9.
Gasser, M. M. (1987). Hydrological aspects of the Nile River at Shoubra El Kheima Power Plant. The Hydr. and Sediment Res. Inst., Delta Barrage, Egypt.
10.
Hopkins, G. R., Vance, R. W., and Kasraie, B. (1980). “Scour around bridge piers.” Report No. FHWA‐RD‐79–103, U.S. Dept. of Transp., Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
11.
Jain, S. C., and Fischer, E. E. (1980). “Scour around bridge piers at high flow velocities.” J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 106(11), 1827–1842.
12.
Jarrett, R. D., and Boyle, J. M. (1986). “Pilot study for collection of bridge‐scour data.” Water‐Resources Investigations Report 86‐4030. U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colo.
13.
Kjerfve, B., Shao, C. C., and Stapor, F. W., Jr. (1979). “Formation of deep scour holes at the junction of tidal creeks: An hypothesis.” Mar. Geology, 33(1/2), M9‐M14.
14.
Komura, S. (1973). “River‐bed variations at confluences.” Presented at the January 9–12, Proc. IAHR Int. Symp. on River Mechanics, Int. Associaation of Hydr. Res. (IAHR), Delft, The Netherlands.
15.
Lawson, T. V. (1980). Wind effects on buildings, design applications. Applied Science Publishers, London, England.
16.
Leliavsky, S. (1955). Irrigation and hydraulic design, General principles of hydraulic design. Chapman and Hall Ltd., London, England.
17.
Melville, B. W. (1975). “Local scour at bridge sites.” Report No. 117, School of Engrg., Univ. of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
18.
Mosley, M. P. (1975). “An experimental study of channel confluences,” thesis presented to Colorado State University, at Fort Collins, Colo., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
19.
Okamoto, S. (1982). “Turbulent shear flow behind hemisphere‐cylinder placed on ground plane.” Turbulent shear flows 3, L. J. S. Bradbury, F. Durst, B. E. Launder, F. W. Schmidt, and J. H. Whitelaw, eds., Springer‐Verlag, New York, N.Y., 171–185.
20.
Pandey, U.S. (1980). “Scour near railway bridge at Mokameh across River Ganga.” Proc. Int. Workshop on Alluvial River Problems, Univ. of Roorkee, Roorkee, India, Sarita Prakashan, New Delhi, India.
21.
Posey, C. J. (1949). “Why bridges fail in floods.” Civ. Engrg., 94, Feb.
22.
Posey, C. J. (1974). “Tests of scour protection for bridge piers.” J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 100(12), 1773–1783.
23.
Raudkivi, A. J. (1986). “Functional trends of scour at bridge piers.” J. Hydr. Engrg., ASCE, 112(1), 1–13.
24.
Shen, H. W., Schneider, V. R., and Karaki, S. (1966). “Mechanics of local scour supplement, methods of reducing scour,” Report No. CER66HWS36, Civ. Engrg. Dept., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
25.
Shen, H. W., Schneider, V. R., and Karaki, S. (1969). “Local scour around bridge piers.” J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 95(6), 1919–1940.
26.
Skinner, M. M., and Ruff, J. F. (1973). “Application of remote sensing to river mechanics.” Environmental impact on rivers, H. W. Shen, ed., Vol. 3, H. W. Shen, Fort Collins, Colo.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 117 • Issue 7 • July 1991
Pages: 891 - 904
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1991
Published in print: Jul 1991
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.