Comparison of Overland Flow Hydrograph Models
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 113, Issue 11
Abstract
The diffusion equation is a simplification of the two‐dimensional continuity and momentum equations. This simpler dynamic model of two‐dimensional hydraulics affords the hydrologist a means to quickly estimate floodflow effects for overland flow. A numerical model using the diffusion approach (DHM) is applied to a set of idealized catchments in order to develop synthetic unit hydrograph S‐graph equivalents. The model is based on an explicit, integrated finite‐difference scheme, and the catchment is represented by topographic elevation and geometric data. Synthetic unit hydrographs (S‐graphs) developed from use of the DHM are used to advance interesting relationships between the unit hydrograph lag factor and the constant effective rainfall intensity used to generate the S‐graphs. Sensitivity of the synthetic S‐graphs to variations in idealized catchment size, slope, shape, friction parameters, and effective rainfall intensity are examined. Comparisons between linear and nonlinear unit hydrograph models, and a diffusion (DHM) and kinematic wave simplification of DHM are made for various time distributions of effective rainfall. Use of the standard SCS unit hydrograph is shown to provide a reasonable approximation of two‐dimensional overland flow as predicted by a DHM or kinematic routing technique.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Akan, A. O., and Yen, B. C. (1981). “Diffusion‐wave flood routing in channel networks.” J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 107 (HY6), 719–732.
2.
Beven, K. (1979). “On the generalized kinematic routing method.” Water Re sour. Res., 15(5).
3.
Hjelmfelt, A. T. (1984). “Convolution and the kinematic wave equations.” J. Hydr., 75, 301–309.
4.
Hjelmfelt, A. T., and Burwell, R. E. (1984). “Spatial variability of runoff.” J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., 110 (1).
5.
Hromadka, T. V., II, et al. (1985). “A two‐dimensional dam‐break flood plain model.” Advances in Water Resour., 8(1), 7–14.
6.
Hromadka, T. V., II, and Nestlinger, A. J. (1985). “Estimating watershed S‐graphs using a diffusion flow model.” Advances in Water Resour, Vol. 8, pg. 214–218, (1985).
7.
Katopodes, N., and Strelkoff, T. (1978). “Computing two‐dimensional dambreak flood waves.” J . Hydr. Div., ASCE, 104(HY9), 1269–1288.
8.
McCuen, R. H. (1982). A guide to hydrologic analysis using S.C.S. methods. Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
9.
Pilgrim, D. H. (1977). “Isochrones of travel time and distribution of flood storage from a tracer study on a small watershed.” Water Resour. Res., 13(3), 587.
10.
Reed, D. W., Johnson, P., and Firth, J. M. (1975). “A non‐linear rainfall‐runoff model, providing for variable lag time.” J. Hydro., 25, 295–305.
11.
Watt, W. E., and Kidd, C. H. R. (1975). “QUURM—A realistic urban runoff model.” J. Hydro., 25, 225–235.
12.
Xanthopoulos, T., and Koutitas, C. (1976). “Numerical simulation of a two‐dimensional flood wave propagation due to dam failure.” J. Hydr. Res., 14 (4).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 113 • Issue 11 • November 1987
Pages: 1422 - 1440
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 ASCE.
History
Published online: Nov 1, 1987
Published in print: Nov 1987
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.