Bridge Abutments: Formulation of Simple Model for Earthquake Response Analysis
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 116, Issue 8
Abstract
A two‐part analytical model is developed to assist in seismic response analysis of highway bridges that have abutments supported on earth embankments. In the first part of the model, an expression is developed for identification of the fundamental transverse frequency of the earth embankment. In the second part, two simple equivalent springs are used to represent the transverse and vertical stiffness of a monolithic abutment system. The springs are based on linear elastic plane‐strain analysis of a typical trapezoidal‐shaped embankment cross section. The spring stiffnesses are related to the cross‐sectional dimensions and the soil properties of the earth embankment, which supports the bridge abutments. These stiffnesses can be incorporated into a detailed dynamic model of the superstructure as the equivalent stiffnesses of the bridge abutments. The frequency and the translational stiffnesses predicted by the model are in good agreement with results from a more complicated analytic theory and from finite element analysis of the abutment soil system. A companion paper illustrates an application of the model and provides comparisons to recorded earthquake responses.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Abdel‐Ghaffar, A. M., and Scott, R. F. (1979). “Analysis of an earth dam response to earthquakes.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 105(12), 1379–1404.
2.
Ambraseys, N. N. (1960). “On the shear response of a two‐dimensional truncated wedge subjected to an arbitrary disturbance.” Bull. Seismologlcal Soc. of Am., 50(1), 44–56.
3.
Chen, M. C., and Penzien J. (1975). “Analytical investigation of seismic response of short, single or multiple span highway bridges.” Report No. EERC‐75‐4, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
4.
Chen, M. C., and Penzien, J. (1977). “Nonlinear soil‐structure interaction of skew highway bridges.” Report No. EERC‐77/24, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Calif.
5.
Crouse, C. B., Hushmand, B., and Martin, G. R. (1987a). “Dynamic soil‐structure interaction of a single‐span bridge.” Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dyn., 15, 711–729.
6.
Crouse, C. B., and Hushmand, B. (1987b). “Estimation of bridge foundation stiffnesses from forced vibration data.” Proc. Third Int. Conf. on Soil Dyn. and Earthquake Engrg., Princeton Univ., June.
7.
Douglas, B. M., and Saiidi, M. (1984). “Effect of design seismic loads on a highway bridge.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 110(11), 2723–2737.
8.
Guide specifications for seismic design of highway bridges—1983. (1983). Am. Assoc. of State and Highway Transp. Officials, Washington, D.C.
9.
Jennings, P. C., and Wood, J. H. (1971). “Earthquake damage to freeway structures.” Engineering Features of the San Fernando Earthquake (Report EERL 71‐02), P. C. Jennings, ed., Earthquake Engrg. Res. Lab., California Inst. of Tech., Pasadena, Calif.
10.
Maragakis, E. A. (1986). “A discrete model for the estimation of the elastic abutment stiffness.” Proc. Third ASCE Engrg. Mech. Specialty Conf. on Dyn. Response of Bridges, ASCE, Mar., 551–558.
11.
Maragakis, E. A., and Jennings, P. C. (1987). “Analytic models for the rigid body motions of skew bridges.” Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dyn., 15(8), 923–944.
12.
“Seismic design guidelines for highway bridges.” (1981). ATC‐6, Appl. Tech. Council, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Dept. of Transp., Washington, D.C., Oct.
13.
Tan, B. S. (1987). “Abutment models for seismic analysis of highway bridges,” thesis presented to McMaster University, at Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Engineering.
14.
Tan, B. S., and Wilson, J. C. (1987). “Models for seismic response of highway bridge abutments.” Proc. Fifth Canadian Conf. on Earthquake Engrg., 619–624.
15.
Tseng, W. C., and Penzien, J. (1973). “Analytical investigation of the seismic response of long multiple span highway bridges.” Report No. EERC‐73/12, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
16.
Werner, S. D., Beck, J. L., and Levine, M. B. (1987). “Seismic response evaluation of Meloland Road Overpass using 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake records.” Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dyn., 15, 249–274.
17.
Wilson, J. C. (1988). “Stiffness of non‐skew monolithic bridge abutments for seismic analysis.” Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dyn., 16(6), 867–883.
18.
Wilson, J. C., and Tan, B. S. (1990). “Bridge abutments: Assessing their influence on earthquake response of Meloland Road Overpass.” J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 116(8), 1838–1856.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 116 • Issue 8 • August 1990
Pages: 1828 - 1837
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 ASCE.
History
Published online: Aug 1, 1990
Published in print: Aug 1990
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.