Bridge Abutments: Assessing Their Influence on Earthquake Response of Meloland Road Overpass
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 116, Issue 8
Abstract
Strong‐motion earthquake data obtained on the Meloland Road Overpass during the 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake are used to examine the suitability of simple models for representing the transverse and vertical stiffnesses of the abutment‐embankment systems on highway bridges. Information on the seismic responses of both the abutment‐embankment systems and the bridge superstructure is obtained by applying techniques of system identification to the strong‐motion records. Analytic models, as developed in a companion paper, that account for the transverse and vertical stiffness characteristics of the bridge abutment systems are used to calculate equivalent abutment stiffnesses for incorporation into finite element models of the Meloland bridge. Predicted earthquake responses of these models are compared to the measured seismic responses and to optimal modal parameters obtained from the system identifications. Results of the various analyses show that the simplified models work quite well in simulating the stiffnesses of the abutments and are able to predict with good accuracy the frequencies and mode shapes of the first symmetric transverse and first symmetric vertical modes of the bridge. These two modes are the major contributors to the seismic response of this bridge. Use of the abutment stiffness models also provides insight into the damping ratios that have been observed for the bridge response.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Beck, J. L. (1978). “Determining models of structures from earthquake records.” Report EERL 78‐01, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Lab., Calif. Inst. of Tech., Pasadena, Calif.
2.
Beck, J. L., and Jennings, P. C. (1980). “Structural identification using linear models and earthquake records.” Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dyn., 8, 145–160.
3.
Clough, R. W., and Penzien, J. (1975). Dynamics of structures. McGraw‐Hill, New York, N.Y.
4.
Geotechnical data from acceleration stations investigated during the period 1975–1979. (1980). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 72, 102, 103.
5.
Poulos, H. G., and Davis, E. H. (1974). Elastic solutions for soil and rock mechanics. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
6.
Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M. (1970). “Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analysis.” Report EERC 70‐10, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
7.
Structural drawings of the Meloland Road Overpass bridge. (1969). Calif. Dept. of Transp., Sacramento, Calif.
8.
Tan, B. S. (1987). “Abutment models for seismic analysis of highway bridges,” thesis presented to McMaster University, at Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Engineering.
9.
Tan, B. S., and Wilson, J. C. (1987). “Models for seismic response for highway bridge abutments.” Proc. Fifth Canadian Conf. on Earthquake Engrg., 619–624.
10.
Werner, S. D., Beck, J. L., and Levine, M. B. (1987). “Seismic response evaluation of Meloland Road Overpass using 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake records.” Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dyn., 15, 249–274.
11.
Wilson, J. C. (1988). “Stiffness of non‐skew monolithic bridge abutments for seismic analysis.” Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dyn., 16(6), 867–883.
12.
Wilson, J. C., and Tan, B. S. (1990). “Bridge abutments: Formulation of simple model for earthquake response analysis.” J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 116(8), 1828–1837.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 ASCE.
History
Published online: Aug 1, 1990
Published in print: Aug 1990
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.