Biological Kinetic Data Evaluation of an Activated Sludge System Coupled with an Ultrafiltration Membrane
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 131, Issue 4
Abstract
A membrane bioreactor (MBR) system treating wastewater containing high molecular weight compounds was operated at solids retention times (SRTs) ranging from 30 to 2 days. Chemical oxygen demand removal efficiencies exceeded 99% and effective nitrification was obtained at SRTs between 30 and 5 days. A significant shift in the biological population structure was observed at the 2 days SRT as the content of gram-negative microorganisms increased and nitrifying bacteria were washed out. At this low SRT, limitations in the biological reaction kinetics resulted in incomplete degradation of the feed protein increasing the presence of soluble organic matter in the effluent. Furthermore, the diluted mixed liquor prevented the formation of a filtration cake on the membrane surface, further deteriorating effluent quality. Biological kinetic data parameters were analyzed using three different representations for biomass: volatile suspended solids, lipid phosphates, and total enzymatic activity. All three indicators exhibited similar trends resulting in very comparable estimates for endogenous decay coefficients, thus demonstrating the reliability of volatile suspended solids as a measure for biological activity in activated sludge. Lower than typical endogenous decay rates in the MBR suggested favorable environmental conditions for respiration and a lower potential for self oxidation and predation. The true yield coefficient was in the range of conventional activated sludge systems, refuting previous suggestions of lower yields in MBRs.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation (APHA/AWWA/WEF). (1992). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th Ed., APHA, Washington, D.C.
Balkwill, D. L., Leach, F. R., Wilson, J. T., McNabb, J. F., and White, D. C. (1988). “Equivalence of microbial biomass measures based on membrane lipid and cell wall components, adenosine triphosphate, and direct counts in subsurface aquifer sediments.” Microb. Ecol., 16, 73–84.
Buisson, H., Cote, P., Praderie, M., and Paillard, H. (1998). “The use of immersed membranes for upgrading wastewater treatment plants.” Water Sci. Technol., 37(9), 89–95.
Cicek, N., Franco, J. P., Suidan, M. T., and Urbain, V. (1998a). “Using a membrane bioreactor to reclaim wastewater.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 90(11), 105–113.
Cicek, N., Franco, J. P., Suidan, M. T., Urbain, V., and Manem, J. (1999). “Characterization and comparison of a membrane bioreactor and a conventional activated-sludge system in the treatment of wastewater containing high-molecular-weight compounds.” Water Environ. Res., 71(1), 64–70.
Cicek, N., Winnen, H., Suidan, M. T., Wrenn, B. E., Urbain, V., and Manem, J. (1998b). “Effectiveness of the membrane bioreactor in the biodegradation of high molecular weight compounds.” Water Res., 32(5), 1553–1563.
Findlay, R. H., King, G. M., and Watling, L. (1989). “Efficacy of phospholipids analysis in determining microbial biomass in sediments,” Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 55, 2888–2893.
Fontvieille, D. A., Outaguerouine, A., and Thevenot, D. R. (1992). “Fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis as a measure of microbial activity in aquatic systems.” Environ. Technol., 13, 531–540.
Leszczynska, M., and Oleszkiewicz, J. A. (1996). “Application of the fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis as an acute toxicity test.” Environ. Technol., 17, 79–85.
Lozier, J. (2000). “Two approaches to indirect potable reuse using membrane technology.” Water Sci. Technol., 41(10–11), 149–156.
Manem, J., and Sanderson, R. (1996). “Membrane bioreactors.” Water treatment: Membrane processes, McGraw-Hill, New York, 17.1–17.31.
Metcalf & Eddy Inc. (1992). Wastewater engineering: Treatment, disposal and reuse, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 394–394.
Nybroe, O., Jorgensen, P. E., and Henze, M. (1992). “Enzyme activities in waste water and activated sludge.” Water Res., 26(5), 579–584.
Ogoshi, M., and Suzuki, Y. (2000). “Application of MBR to an easily installed municipal wastewater treatment plant.” Water Sci. Technol., 41(10–11), 287–293.
Schnürer, J., and Rosswall, T. (1982). “Fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis as a measure of total microbial activity in soil and litter.” Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 43(6), 1256–1261.
Trouve, E., Urbain, V., and Manem, J. (1994). “Treatment of municipal wastewater by a membrane bioreactor: Results of semi-industrial pilot-scale study.” Water Sci. Technol., 30(1), 151–157.
Weisner, M., and Chellam, S. (1999). “The promise of membrane technologies.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 33(17), 360A–366A.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 131 • Issue 4 • April 2005
Pages: 579 - 586
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Feb 20, 2003
Accepted: Jul 7, 2004
Published online: Apr 1, 2005
Published in print: Apr 2005
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.