TECHNICAL PAPERS
Nov 15, 2004

Removal of 17β Estradiol and Fluoranthene by Nanofiltration and Ultrafiltration

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 130, Issue 12

Abstract

With the recent emergence of endocrine disrupting compounds as an important potable drinking water and reclaimed wastewater quality issue, the removal of two estrogenic compounds (17β-estradiol and fluoranthene) by nanofiltration and ultrafiltration membranes was investigated. A less hydrophobic organic compound model species [parachlorobenzoic acid (PCBA)] was tested. 17β-estradiol (E2), fluoranthene, and PCBA were applied to the membrane in the presence and absence of natural organic matter (NOM). Both batch adsorption and dead-end stirred-cell filtration experiments indicated that adsorption is an important mechanism for transport/removal of relatively hydrophobic compounds, and is related to the octanol-water partition coefficient (KOW) values. All filtration measurements were performed approximately the same permeate flow rate in order to minimize artifacts from concentration polarization varied with different hydrodynamic operating conditions at the membrane interface. The percent removal by dead-end stirred-cell filtration ranged from 10 to >95% depending upon membrane pore size/hydrophobicity and presence/absence of NOM at an initial concentration ranging from 0.1 to 0.5 μM. Additional batch adsorption experiments with radio-label (3H) E2 at lower concentrations ranging 0.025 to 5 nM showed that E2 removal due to adsorption was independent of its initial concentration. Adsorption occurs both on the membrane surface and interior membrane pore surfaces. However, adsorption was insignificant for PCBA (logKOW=2.7), but removal presumably occurred due to electrostatic exclusion. Partition coefficients (logK) of 0.44 to 4.86 measured in this study increased with logKOW and membrane pore size.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Adams, C., Wang, Y., Loftin, K., and Meyer, M. (2002). “Removal of antibiotics from surface and distilled water in conventional water treatment processes.” J. Environ. Eng., 128(3), 253–260.
2.
Adamson, A.W., and Gast, A.P. ( 1997). Physical chemistry of surface, Wiley-Interscience, New York.
3.
Alben, K. (1980). “Coal-tar coatings of storage tanks—A source of contamination of the potable water supply.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 14(4), 468–470.
4.
Basu, D. K., and Saxena, J. (1978). “Polynuclear aromatic-hydrocarbons in selected United States drinking waters and their raw water sources.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 12(7), 795–798.
5.
Belfroid, A. C. et al. (1999). “Analysis and occurrence of estrogenic hormones and their glucuronides in surface water and waste water in The Netherlands.” Sci. Total Environ., 225(1–2), 101–108.
6.
Benoit, F. M., Lebel, G. L., and Williams, D. T. (1979). “Determination of polycyclic aromatic-hydrocarbons At the Ng-L level in Ottawa tap water.” Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 6(4), 277–287.
7.
Berg, P., Hagmeyer, G., and Gimbel, R. (1997). “Removal of pesticides and other micropollutants by nanofiltration.” Desalination, 113(2–3), 205–208.
8.
Boussahel, R., Bouland, S., Moussaoui, K. M., and Montiel, A. (2000). “Removal of pesticide residues in water using the nanofiltration process.” Desalination, 132(1–3), 205–209.
9.
Carroll, T., Booker, N. A., and Meier-Haack, J. (2002). “Polyelectrolyte-grafted microfiltration membranes to control fouling by natural organic matter in drinking water.” J. Membr. Sci., 203(1–2), 3–13.
10.
Childress, A. E., and Elimelech, M. (1996). “Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes.” J. Membr. Sci., 119(2), 253–268.
11.
Childress, A. E., and Deshmukh, S. S. (1998). “Effect of humic substances and anionic surfactants on the surface charge and performance of reverse osmosis membranes.” Desalination, 118(1–3), 167–174.
12.
Childress, A. E., and Elimelech, M. (2000). “Relating nanofiltration membrane performance to membrane charge (electrokinetic) characteristics.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 34(17), 3710–3716.
13.
Cho, J. W., Amy, G., and Pellegrino, J. (1999). “Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: Initial comparison of rejection and flux decline characteristics with ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes.” Water Res., 33(11), 2517–2526.
14.
Cho, J., Amy, G., and Pellegrino, J. (2000). “Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: factors and mechanisms affecting rejection and flux decline with charged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane.” J. Membr. Sci., 164(1–2), 89–110.
15.
Combe, C., Molis, E., Lucas, P., Riley, R., and Clark, M. M. (1999). “The effect of CA membrane properties on adsorptive fouling by humic acid.” J. Membr. Sci., 154(1), 73–87.
16.
Deshmukh, S. S., and Childress, A. E. (2001). “Zeta potential of commercial RO membranes: influence of source water type and chemistry.” Desalination, 140(1), 87–95.
17.
Drewes, J., Heberer, T., and Reddersen, K. ( 2001). “Removal of pharmaceuticals during conventional wastewater treatment, advanced membrane treatment and soil-aquifer treatment.” Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Pharmaceuticals and Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals in Water.
18.
Elimelech, M., Chen, W. H., and Waypa, J. J. (1994). “Measuring the zeta (Electrokinetic) potential of reverse-osmosis membranes by a streaming potential analyzer.” Desalination, 95(3), 269–286.
19.
Fairbrother, F., and Mastin, H. J. (1924). “Studies in electro-endosmosis.” Chem. Soc., 125, 2319.
20.
Flowers, L. et al. (2002). “Health assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon mixtures: Current practices and future directions.” Polycyclic Aromatic Compd., 22(3–4), 811–821.
21.
Garba, Y., Taha, S., Gondrexon, N., and Dorange, G. (1999). “Ion transport modelling through nanofiltration membranes.” J. Membr. Sci., 160(2), 187–200.
22.
Gekas, V., and Zhang, W. (1989). “Membrane characterization using porosimetry and contact-angle measurements—A comparison with experimental ultrafiltration results.” Process Biochem., 24(5), 159–166.
23.
Gekas, V., Persson, K. M., Wahlgren, M., and Sivik, B. (1992). “Contact angles of ultrafiltration membranes and their possible correlation to membrane performance.” J. Membr. Sci., 72, 293–302.
24.
Halling-Sorensen, B. et al. (1998). “Occurrence, fate, and effects of pharmaceutical substances in the environment-A review.” Chemosphere, 36(2), 357–394.
25.
Her, N., Amy, G., and Jarusutthirak, C. (2000). “Seasonal variations of nanofiltration (NF) foulants: Identification and control.” Desalination, 132(1–3), 143–160.
26.
Hofman, J., Beerendonk, E. F., Folmer, H. C., and Kruithof, J. C. (1997). “Removal of pesticides and other micropollutants with cellulose-acetate, polyamide and ultra-low pressure reverse osmosis membranes.” Desalination, 113(2–3), 209–214.
27.
Hong, S. K., and Elimelech, M. (1997). “Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes.” J. Membr. Sci., 132(2), 159–181.
28.
Huang, C. H., and Sedlak, D. L. (2001). “Analysis of estrogenic hormones in municipal wastewater effluent and surface water using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry.” Environ. Toxicology Chem., 20(1), 133–139.
29.
Kiso, Y., Nishimura, Y., Kitao, T., and Nishimura, K. (2000). “Rejection properties of non-phenylic pesticides with nanofiltration membranes.” J. Membr. Sci., 171(2), 229–237.
30.
Kiso, Y., Kon, T., Kitao, T., and Nishimura, K. (2001a). “Rejection properties of alkyl phthalates with nanofiltration membranes.” J. Membr. Sci., 182(1–2), 205–214.
31.
Kiso, Y., Sugiura, Y., Kitao, T., and Nishimura, K. (2001b). “Effects of hydrophobicity and molecular size on rejection of aromatic pesticides with nanofiltration membranes.” J. Membr. Sci., 192(1–2), 1–10.
32.
Kiso, Y., Mizuno, A., Othman, R., Jung, Y. J., Kumano, A., and Ariji, A. (2002). “Rejection properties of pesticides with a hollow fiber NF membrane (HNF-1).” Desalination, 143(2), 147–157.
33.
Kosutic, K., and Kunst, B. (2002). “Removal of organics from aqueous solutions by commercial RO and NF membranes of characterized porosities.” Desalination, 142(1), 47–56.
34.
Nghiem, L. D., and Schafer, A. I. (2002). “Adsorption and transport of trace contaminant estrogen in NF/RO membranes.” Environ. Eng. Sci., 19(6), 441–451.
35.
Ozaki, H., and Li, H. F. (2002). “Rejection of organic compounds by ultra-low pressure reverse osmosis membrane.” Water Res., 36(1), 123–130.
36.
Schafer, A. I., Nghiem, L. D., and Waite, T. D. (2003). “Removal of the natural hormone estrone from aqueous solutions using nanofiltration and reverse osmosis.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 37(1), 182–188.
37.
Schueler, F. W. (1946). “Sex-hormonal action and chemical constitution.” Science, 103, 221–223.
38.
Seidel, A., and Elimelech, M. (2002). “Coupling between chemical and physical interactions in natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes: implications for fouling control.” J. Membr. Sci., 203(1–2), 245–255.
39.
Sluczewski, A., and Roth, P. (1948). “Effects of androgenic and estrogenic compounds on the experimental metamorphoses of amphibians.” Gynecol. Obstet., 47, 164–176.
40.
Snyder, S. A. et al. (1999). “Analytical methods for detection of selected estrogenic compounds in aqueous mixtures.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 33(16), 2814–2820.
41.
Snyder, S. A., Westerhoff, P., Yoon, Y., and Sedlak, D. L. (2003). “Pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and endocrine disruptors in water: implications for water treatment.” Environ. Eng. Sci., 20(9), 449–469.
42.
Ternes, T. A. et al. (1999). “Behavior and occurrence of estrogens in municipal sewage treatment plants. I: Investigations in Germany, Canada, and Brazil.” Sci. Total Environ., 225(1–2), 81–90.
43.
Van der Bruggen, B., Schaep, J., Maes, W., Wilms, D., and Vandecasteele, C. (1998). “Nanofiltration as a treatment method for the removal of pesticides from ground waters.” Desalination, 117(1–3), 139–147.
44.
Van der Bruggen, B., Everaert, K., Wilms, D., and Vandecasteele, C. (2001). “Application of nanofiltration for removal of pesticides, nitrate and hardness from ground water: rejection properties and economic evaluation.” J. Membr. Sci., 193(2), 239–248.
45.
Van der Bruggen, B., Braeken, L., and Vandecasteele, C. (2002). “Evaluation of parameters describing flux decline in nanofiltration of aqueous solutions containing organic compounds.” Desalination, 147(1–3), 281–188.
46.
Vrijenhoek, E. M., Hong, S., and Elimelech, M. (2001). “Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes.” J. Membr. Sci., 188(1), 115–128.
47.
Wilbert, M. C., Delagah, S., and Pellegrino, J. (1999). “Variance of streaming potential measurements.” J. Membr. Sci., 161(1–2), 247–261.
48.
Yoon, Y., Yoon, J., and Amy, G. ( 2001). “Dominant potential mechanisms for perchlorate rejection by negatively charged nanofiltration and ultrafiltration membranes.” Proc., American Water Works Association Membrane Technology Conf., AWWA, Denver.
49.
Yoon, Y., Amy, G., Cho, J. W., Her, N., and Pellegrino, J. (2002). “Transport of perchlorate ( ClO4-) through NF and UF membranes.” Desalination, 147(1–3), 11–17.
50.
Yoon, Y., Westerhoff, P., Snyder, S. A., and Esparza, M. (2003). “HPLC-fluorescence detection and adsorption of bisphenol A, 17b-estradiol, and 17a-ethynyl estradiol on powdered activated carbon.” Water Res., 37(14), 3530–3537.
51.
Zhang, W., Wahlgren, M., and Sivik, B. (1989). “Membrane characterization by the contact-angle technique. II: Characterization of UF-membranes and comparison between the captive bubble and sessile drop As methods to obtain water contact angles.” Desalination, 72(3), 263–273.
52.
Zhang, W., and Hallstrom, B. (1990). “Membrane characterization using the contact-angle technique. I: Methodology of the captive bubble technique.” Desalination, 79(1), 1–12.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 130Issue 12December 2004
Pages: 1460 - 1467

History

Published online: Nov 15, 2004
Published in print: Dec 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yeomin Yoon
Research Associate, Northwestern Univ. Mechanical Engineering, 2145 Sheridan Rd., Evanston, IL 60208 (corresponding author); formerly, Faculty Research Associate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Arizona State Univ., ECG-252, Tempe, AZ 85287-5306. E-mail: [email protected]
Paul Westerhoff
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Arizona State Univ., ECG-252, Tempe, AZ 85287-5306.
Jaekyung Yoon
Postdoctoral Research Associate, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado at Boulder, ECOT-441, Boulder, CO 80309.
Shane A. Snyder
R&D Project Manager, Southern Nevada Water Authority, Las Vegas, NV 89153.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share