Impacts of Meteorological Variations on Acid Rain Abatement Decisions
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 116, Issue 6
Abstract
A linear programming (LP) based simulation model is used to examine the effects of variable meteorology on optimal controls for acid‐rain abatement in eastern North America. The LP model minimizes the total cost of pollution control corresponding to 235 controllable point sources subject to satisfying the maximum acid deposition limits at 20 receptor locations. The meteorlogic inputs are transformed into transfer coefficients that relate emissions from sources to depositions at receptors. The meteorologic inputs vary from season to season and year to year, reflecting meteorologic uncertainty. The resulting optimal control strategies for five years of meteorologic data are used in a simulation model to develop a curve of control costs versus the cumulative violation of a critical deposition limit at the selected receptor locations in order to study the trade‐off between emission reduction cost and “damage” reduction.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Barrie, L. A. and Hales, J. M. (1984). “The spatial distribution of precipitation acidity and major ion wet deposition in North America during 1980.” Tellus 36B, (5), 333–355.
2.
Ellis, J. H., McBean, E. A., and Farquhar, G. J. (1985). “Deterministic linear programming model for acid rain abatement,” J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 111(2), 119–139.
3.
Ellis, J. H., McBean, E. A., and Farquhar, G. J. (1986). “Chance‐constrained/stochastic linear programming model for acid rain abatement—II. Limited colinearity.” Atmos. Envir., 20(3), 501–511.
4.
Kompter, M. G. (1987). “Detectability of step trends in the rate of atmospheric sulfate deposition,” thesis presented to the University of Waterloo, at Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
5.
McBean, E. A., Ellis, J. H., and Fortin, M. (1985). “A screening model for development and evaluation of acid rain abatement strategies.” J. Envir. Mgmt., 21(4), 287–299.
6.
Olson, D. L., and Swenseth, S. R. (1987). “A linear approximation for chance‐constrained programming.” J. Opl. Res. Soc., 38(3), 261–267.
7.
Ontario Ministry of the Environment. (1980). The case against the acid rain, A report on acidic precipitation and Ontario programs for remedial action. Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
8.
Ontario Ministry of the Environment. (1983). Linear programming screening model for development and evaluation of acid rain abatement strategies. Policy and Planning Branch, Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
9.
Shaw, R. W. (1986). “A proposed strategy for reducing sulfate deposition in North America—II. Methodology for minimizing costs.” Atmos. Envir., 20(1), 201–206.
10.
Shipley, K. B., et al. (1987). “Incorporation of windroses in a statistical long‐range pollution transport model.” Water Air Soil Pollut., 36(1/2), 115–130.
11.
Streets, D. G., Hanson, D. A., and Carter, L. D. (1984). “Targeted strategies for control of acidic deposition.” J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc., 34(12), 1187–1197.
12.
Venkatram, A., Ley, B. E., and Wong, S. Y. (1982). “A statistical model to estimate long‐term concentrations of pollutants associated with long‐range transport.” Atmos. Envir., 16(2), 249–257.
13.
Young, J. W. S., and Shaw, R. W. (1986). “A proposed strategy for reducing sulfate deposition in North America—I. Methodology for minimizing sulfur removal.” Atmos. Envir., 20(1), 189–199.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 ASCE.
History
Published online: Oct 1, 1990
Published in print: Oct 1990
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.