Identifying and Assessing Influence Factors on Improving Waste Management Performance for Building Construction Projects
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 135, Issue 7
Abstract
Environmental sustainability has become one of the key drivers for continuous growth in the construction industry. Many project practitioners face challenging circumstances in finding an effective way to prevent pollution and minimize wastes by making the best use of the increasingly scarce natural resources. However, most of these efforts are focused on planning and/or design strategies; therefore, they fail to thoroughly cover the environmental issues based on the construction execution level. Further, there is a lack of quantitative measurement system and management-level guidance. To overcome these limitations, this paper proposes a new methodology that assists project managers to assess the performance level of a project in terms of waste management practice. This study is based on a two-pronged approach. One is the identification of the waste management influence factors that play an important role in decreasing waste and increasing recycled materials on construction sites. The other is the development of an assessment tool to measure the level of waste management performance for a particular project. As a result of this work, 59 factors were identified and an assessment tool was developed based on quantification of these factors. The tool has been proved to effectively measure waste management performance throughout four real-case validity tests. From the industry perspective, this paper contributes to establishing the environmentally sustainable production systems by providing the project stakeholders with an established set of influence factors and with a diagnosis tool for measuring their current performance. Additionally, project owners can use the output of the tool, especially the total index score, as a measure to benchmark the level of waste management for continuous improvement.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers would like to thank many individuals who participated in the survey and anonymous reviewers for detailed and helpful comments. This work was supported by Sustainable Building Research Center at Hanyang University sponsored by the SRC/ERC Program of Ministry of Science and Technology in Korea (MOST) (Grant No. R11-2005-056-03004-0).
References
Bennett, M., and James, P. (1999). “The evolution of integrated environmental performance evaluation and reporting at Baxter International.” Sustainable measures: Evaluation and reporting of environmental and social performance, Greenleaf Publications, Sheffield, U.K., 253–282.
Bossink, B., and Brouwers, H. (1996). “Construction waste: Quantification and source evaluation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 122(1), 55–60.
Chen, Z., and Li, H. (2006). Environmental management in construction, Taylor & Francis, New York.
Cole, R. (2000). “Building environmental assessment methods: Assessing construction practices.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 18, 949–957.
Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG). (2006). “Code for sustainable homes: A step-change in sustainable home building practice.” Department for Communities and Local Government, London, ⟨http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/uploads/code_for_sust_homes.pdf⟩.
Formoso, C., Soibelman, L., Cesare, C., and Isatto, E. (2002). “Material waste in building industry: Main causes and prevention.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(4), 316–325.
Institute for Building Environment and Energy Conservation in Japan (IBEC). (2004). Comprehensive assessment system for building environmental efficiency for new construction (CASBEE-NC), Sustainable Building Research Center (SUSB), ed., Korea.
Kim, J., Kim, J., Cha, H., and Shin, D. (2006). “Development of the construction waste management performance evaluation tool.” Proc., 23rd Int. Symp. on Automation and Robotics in Construction, IAARC, Tokyo, 263–268.
Kuhre. (1998). “ISO 14031 environmental performance evaluation (EPE).” Practice tools and techniques for conducting an environmental performance evaluation, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Lingard, H., Gilbert, G., and Graham, P. (2001). “Improving solid waste reduction and recycling performance using goal setting and feedback.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 19, 809–817.
Ministry of Construction and Transportation/Ministry of Environment (MOCT/MOE). (2006). Green building certification implementing guide, Korea.
Pitt, M., and Smith, A. (2003). “An assessment of waste management efficiency at BAA airports.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 21, 421–431.
Seo, S., Aramaki, T., Hwang, Y., and Hanaki, K. (2004). “Environmental impact of solid waste treatment methods in Korea.” Environ. Eng., 130(1), 81–89.
Tam, V., Tam, C., Yiu, K., and Cheung, S. (2006). “Critical factors for environmental performance assessment (EPA) in the Hong Kong construction industry.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 24, 1113–1123.
Teo, M., and Loosemore, M. (2001). “A theory of waste behaviour in the construction industry.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 19, 741–751.
Ugwu, O., Kumaraswamy, M., Wong, A., and Ng, S. (2006). “Sustainability appraisal in infrastructure projects (SUSAIP). Part 1: Development of indicators and computational methods.” Autom. Constr., 15, 239–251.
U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC). (2002). “LEED: Green building rating system for new construction and major renovations (LEED-NC) version 2.1.” U.S. Green Building Council, ⟨https://www.usgbc.org/Docs/LEEDdocs/LEED_RS_v2-1.pdf⟩.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Jun 27, 2007
Accepted: Jan 21, 2009
Published online: Jun 15, 2009
Published in print: Jul 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.