TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jul 1, 2007

Budgeting Owner’s Construction Contingency

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 133, Issue 7

Abstract

This paper attempts to find ways to reduce an owner’s construction contingency budget such that just enough contingency is allocated that will allow the owner to deal with uncertainties but at the same time not tie up valuable funds that can be used for other activities. It is suggested that the common practice of allocating a fixed owner contingency (e.g., 10% of the contract value) to all projects contracted out by an owner is not appropriate. Instead, a methodology is proposed whereby the owner (1) analyzes historical project data; (2) identifies the line items that are problematic; (3) takes the necessary measures at the preconstruction stage to streamline these line items with respect to site conditions, time constraints, constructability issues, and project scope; and (4) finally budgets contingency funds based on this information. A case study was conducted to analyze the contingencies budgeted and actually spent by an owner in nine parking lot projects. The findings indicated that a systematic approach such as the methodology proposed in this paper is likely to minimize the owner’s contingency budget.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Anderson, S. D., Fisher, D. J., and Rahman, S. P. (2000). “Integrating constructability into project development: A process approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 126(2), 81–88.
Arditi, D., Elhassan, A., and Toklu, C. (2002). “Constructability analysis in the design firm.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(2), 117–126.
Baccarini, D. (2004). “Accuracy in estimating project cost construction contingency—A statistical analysis.” The Int. Construction Research Conf. of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, Leeds Metropolitan Univ, Leeds, U.K.
Barrie, D. S., and Paulson, B. C. (1992). Professional construction management, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1986). “Scope definition and control.” Rep. No. RS6-2, Austin, Tex.
Construction Institute of ASCE. (2007). “Constructability Committee.” http://www.constructioninst.org/committee (Feb. 14, 2007).
Dumont, R. P., Gibson, E. G., and Fish, J. R. (1997). “Scope management using project definition rating index.” J. Manage. Eng., 13(5), 54–60.
Dunston, P. S., Gambatese, J. A., and McManus, J. F. (2005). “Assessing state transportation agency constructability implementation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(5), 569–578.
Ford, D. (2002). “Achieving multiple project objectives through contingency management.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(1), 30–39.
Gunhan, S., and Arditi, D. (2007). “Avoiding change orders in public school construction.” J. Profl. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 133(1), 67–73.
Hanna, A., Russell, J., Nordheim, E., and Bruggink, M. (1999). “Impact of change orders on labor efficiency for electrical construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(4), 224–232.
Knight, K., and Fayek, A. R. (2002). “Use of fuzzy logic for predicting design cost overruns on building projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(6), 503–512.
Mak, S., and Picken, D. (2000). “Using risk analysis to determine construction project contingencies.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 126(2), 130–136.
Molenaar, K. (2005). “Programmatic cost risk analysis for highway megaprojects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(3), 343–353.
Oberlender, G. (2000). Project management for engineering and construction, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Oberlender, G., and Trost, S. (2001). “Predicting accuracy of early cost estimates based on estimate quality.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 127(3), 173–182.
Smith, G., and Bohn, C. (1999). “Small to medium contractor contingency and assumption of risk.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(2), 101–108.
Songer, A. D., and Molenaar, K. R. (1997). “Project characteristics for successful public-sector design build.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 123(1), 34–40.
Touran, A. (2003). “Probabilistic model for cost contingency.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 129(3), 280–284.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 133Issue 7July 2007
Pages: 492 - 497

History

Received: Oct 11, 2006
Accepted: Jan 22, 2007
Published online: Jul 1, 2007
Published in print: Jul 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Suat Günhan, M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Architecture, Izmir Univ. of Economics, 35330 Balcova, Izmir, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected]
David Arditi, M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Illinois Institute of Tech., Chicago, IL 60616. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share