Contractor Key Competitiveness Indicators: A China Study
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 132, Issue 4
Abstract
A proper method to assess contractor competitiveness is important both for assisting clients in the selection of proper contractors and for assisting contractors in the development of more competitive bidding strategies. Previous studies have identified various indicators for assessing contractor competitiveness, and several assessment methods have been introduced. Nevertheless, these studies are limited because they are unable to tell which indicators are more important in different market environments. This paper identifies the key competitiveness indicators (KCIs) for assessing contractor competitiveness in the Chinese construction market. An index value is used to indicate the relative significance of various competitiveness indicators based on which KCIs are identified. The data applied in this study are from a survey of the construction industry in mainland China. The research findings provide valuable information for both existing businesses and the construction professionals who plan to compete for construction works in the Chinese market. The study provides useful references for further studies that compare the KCIs used in the Chinese construction industry and those used in other construction industries.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Building Economic Development Committee. (1983). Faster building for industry, H.M.S.O., London.
Chan, D. W. M., and Kumaraswamy, M. M. (1997). “A comparative study of causes of time overrun in Hong Kong construction projects.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 15(1), 55–63.
Chau, D. K. H., Kog, Y. C., and Loh, P. K. (1999). “Critical success factors for different project objectives.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(3), 142–150.
Flanagan, R., and Norman, G. (1982). “An examination of the tendering pattern of individual building contractors.” Build. Technol. Manage., 20(4), 25–28.
Hambrick, D. C. (1984). “Taxonomic approaches to studying strategy: Some conceptual and methodological issues.” Journal of Management, 10(1), 27–41.
Hatush, Z., and Skitmore, M. (1997). “Criteria for contractor selection.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 15(1), 19–38.
Holt, G. D., Olomolaiye, P. O., and Harris, F. C. (1994). “Factors influencing U.K. construction clients’ choice of contractor.” Build. Environ., 29, 241–248.
Huang, T., Shen, L. Y., Zhao, Z. Y., and Yam, C. H. (2005). “The current practice of managing public sector projects in China.” Construction Economy, 2005(1), 16–21.
IMD. (2003). World Competitiveness Yearbook, 2003, IMD, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Invancevich, J. M., Lorenzi, P., and Skinner, S. J. (1997). Management quality and competitiveness, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Ministry of Construction. (2001). Criteria of construction firm qualification grade.
Moungnos, W., and Charoenngam, C. (2003). “Operational delay factors at multi-stages in Thai building construction.” Int. Journal of Construction Management, 3(1), 15–30.
Ray-Jones, A., and Clegg, D. (1976). CI/Sfb Construction indexing manual, 3rd ed., RIBA Publications, London.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Select Committee of the House of Lords. (1985). Rep. of the Select Committee of the House of Lords on Overseas Trade, London.
Shen, L. Y., Lu, W. S., Shen, Q. P., and Li, H. (2003). “A computer-aided decision support system for assessing a contractor’s competitiveness.” Autom. Constr., 12(2003), 577–587.
Shen, Q. P., and Liu, G. W. (2003). “Critical success factors for value management studies in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 129(5), 485–491.
U.S. Competitiveness Policy Council. (1992). “Building a competitive America.” First Rep. to the President and Congress, Competitiveness Policy Council, Washington, D.C.
Watkinson, M. (1992). “Procurement alternatives.” Faculty of Building Journal, Nottingham, Autumn, 4–7.
World Economic Forum, (1996). Global Competitiveness Rep., World Economic Forum, Geneva.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: May 25, 2004
Accepted: Aug 30, 2005
Published online: Apr 1, 2006
Published in print: Apr 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.