Conflict Resolution in Construction Disputes Using the Graph Model
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 132, Issue 10
Abstract
A formal approach is presented for systematically resolving construction conflicts. Using an actual case study, a decision support system based on the graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR II), is employed to effectively investigate the strategic interactions that took place between an owner and a general contractor concerning the financing of a construction project. The conflict analysis process considers the decision participants, their decision options, and their relative preferences when modeling the dispute. GMCR II is then used to perform an in-depth stability analysis in order to ascertain the possible compromise resolutions or equilibria. In the case study, GMCR II correctly predicts the sequence of decisions that took place in the dispute and furnishes an array of useful strategic insights about the conflict. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis is executed to determine how changes in preferences can affect the equilibrium results. This conflict resolution procedure is useful for both researchers and practitioners to better deal with the dispute-prone nature of the construction industry.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Adrian, J. J. (1993). Construction claims: A quantitative approach, Stipes, Champaign, Ill.
American Arbitration Association (AAA). (2000). “2000 Annual Report.” ⟨http://www.ads.org/⟩ (June 21, 2001).
Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation, Basic Books, New York.
Berge, C. (1973). Graphs and hypergraphs, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fang, L., Hipel, K. W., and Kilgour, D. M. (1993). Interactive decision making: The graph model for conflict resolution, Wiley, New York.
Fang, L., Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., and Peng, X. (2003a). “A decision support system for interactive decision making, Part I: Model formulation.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., Part C Appl. Rev., 33(1), 42–55.
Fang, L., Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., and Peng, X. (2003b). “A decision support system for interactive decision making, Part II: Analysis and output interpretation.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., Part C Appl. Rev., 33(1), 56–66.
Fraser, N. M., and Hipel, K. W. (1984). Conflict analysis: Models and Resolutions, North-Holland, New York.
Harary, F. (1969). Graph theory, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., Fang, L., and Peng, J. (1997). “The decision support system GMCR in environmental conflict management.” Appl. Math. Comput., 83(2,3) 117–152.
Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., and Fang, L. (2002). “The graph model for conflict resolution.” Encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS), EOLSS, Oxford, U.K.
Howard, N. (1971). Paradoxes of rationality: Theory of metagames and political behavior, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Jergeas, G. F., and Hartman, F. T. (1994). “Contractor’s construction claims avoidance.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 120(3), 553–560.
Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs, Wiley, New York.
Kumaraswamy, M. M., and Yogeswaran, K. (1998). “Significant sources of construction claims.” Int. Constr. Law Rev., 15(1), 144–160.
Maxwell, D. T. (2002). “It’s not your grandfather’s decision analysis software.” Oper. Res. Manage. Sci. Today, 29(3), 44–51.
Nash, J. F. (1950). “Equilibrium points in -person games.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 36, 48–49.
Nash, J. F. (1951). “Non-cooperative games.” Ann. Math., 54, 286–295.
Norman, R. Z., Harary, F., and Cartwright, D. (1965). Structural models: An introduction to the theory of directed graphs, Wiley, New York.
Panagiotis, M., and Howell, G. (2001). “A model for understanding, preventing, and resolving project disputes.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 127(3), 223–231.
Rapoport, A., Guyer, M. J., and Gordon, D. G. (1976). The 2×2 game, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytical aierarchy process, Wiley, New York.
Semple, C., Hartman, F. T., and Jergeas, G. (1994). “Construction claims and disputes: Causes and cost/time overruns.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 120(4), 785–795.
Thiessen, E. M., and Loucks, D. P. (1992). “Computer-assisted negotiation of multiobjective water resources conflicts.” Water Resour. Bull., 28(1), 163–177.
Von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O. (1953). Theory of games and economic behavior, 3rd Ed., Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Williamson, O. (1979). “Transaction cost economics: The governance of contractual relations.” J. Law Econom., 22, 233–261.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 132 • Issue 10 • October 2006
Pages: 1043 - 1052
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: May 16, 2005
Accepted: Jan 12, 2006
Published online: Oct 1, 2006
Published in print: Oct 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.