Determination of Haul Distance and Direction in Mass Excavation
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 131, Issue 3
Abstract
Currently, construction professionals can easily determine the amount of cut and fill on a mass excavation project, but can only make an educated and intuitive guess as to the required minimum haul distances and the directions to move the earth. This paper develops a mathematical optimization model for the determination of these minimum haul distances and directions. The two-dimensional model presented uses linear programming. An example of how this generic model works is detailed in this paper. Necessary inputs are the cut and fill quantities and the location of these on the site. With this mathematical model, the quantity of earth hauled, the minimum haul distances, and the locations to haul the material are determined. The solution is then made into a vector diagram detailing the quantity and direction to move material that can be used by nontechnical personnel in the field. The formulation presented in this paper will assist construction professionals by providing a method to find an optimal solution to the mass earthmoving problem. A pilot user interface is tested to investigate the possible use of an automated input system to reduce input error.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Caterpillar (2000). Caterpillar performance handbook, 31st Ed., Caterpillar Inc., Peoria, Ill.
Christian, J., and Caldera, H. (1988). “Earthmoving cost optimization by operational research.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 15(4), 679–684.
Easa, S. M. (1988). “Earthwork allocations with linear unit costs.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 114(4), 641–655.
Jayawardane, A. K. W., and Harris, F. C. (1990).“Further development of integer programming in earthwork optimization.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 116(1), 18–34.
Jayawardane, A. K. W., and Price, A. D. F. (1994a). “A new approach for optimizing earth moving operations. Part I.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., Transp., 105(3), 195–207.
Jayawardane, A. K. W., and Price, A. D. F. (1994b).“A new approach for optimizing earth moving operations. Part 2.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., Transp., 105(4), 249–258.
Peurifoy, R. L., and Schexnayder, C. J. (2002). Construction planning, equipment, and methods, 6th Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Scharge, L. (1982), User’s manual for LINDO, Scientific Press, Palo Alto, Calif.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Jan 13, 2002
Accepted: Jun 10, 2004
Published online: Mar 1, 2005
Published in print: Mar 2005
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.