Improving Labor Flow Reliability for Better Productivity as Lean Construction Principle
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYThis article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 129, Issue 3
Abstract
New management thinking, like that of lean production, has suggested that better labor and cost performance can be achieved by improving the reliability of flows. In this context, lean thinking portrays reliable flows as the timely availability of resources, i.e., materials, information, and equipment. Little attention has been given to labor as a flow. Further, little discussion can be found related to flexible capacity management strategies. Efforts to utilize lean thinking in construction, so far, have generated limited evidence to support the need for more reliable labor flows. This paper investigates the lean principle that more reliable flows lead to better labor performance. Actual data from three bridge construction projects are examined to document the instances of poor flow (resource) reliability and its effect on labor performance. Inefficient labor hours are calculated. The results show that there is strong support that more reliable material, information, and equipment availability contributes to better performance. However, the projects showed considerable deficiencies in the utilization of the labor resource. It is concluded that lean improvement initiatives should focus more on workforce management strategies to improve labor utilization that will lead to better labor performance.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Ballard, G. (1999). “Improving work flow reliability.” Proc., IGLC-7, 7th Conf. of Int. Group for Lean Construction, Univ. California, Berkeley, Calif., 275–286.
Ballard, G., and Howell, G.(1998). “Shielding production: Essential step in production control.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124(1), 11–17.
Horman, M. J. (2000). “Process dynamics: Buffer management in building project operations.” PhD thesis, Univ. Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Horman, M. J., and Kenley, R.(1998). “Process dynamics; Identifying a strategy for the deployment of buffers in building projects.” Int. J. Logistics: Research and Applications, 1(3), 221–237.
Koskela, L. (1992). “Application of the new production philosophy to construction.” Tech. Rep. No. 72, Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
Thomas, H. R.(2000). “Schedule acceleration, work flow, and labor productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 126(4), 261–267.
Thomas, H. R., Horman, M. J., de Souza, U. E. L., and Zavřski, I.(2002). “Reducing variability to improve performance as a lean construction principle.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(2), 144–154.
Thomas, H. R., Riley, D. R., and Sanvido, V. E.(1999). “Loss of labor productivity due to delivery methods and weather.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(1), 39–46.
Thomas, H. R., and Sanvido, V. E.(2000). “Role of the fabricator in labor productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 126(5), 358–365.
Thomas, H. R., Sanvido, V. E., and Sanders, S. R.(1989). “Impact of material management on productivity—A case study.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 115(3), 370–384.
Thomas, H. R., and Zavřski, I.(1999). “Construction baseline productivity: Theory and practice.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(5), 295–303.
Womack, J. P., and Jones, D. T. (1996). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation, Simon and Shuster, New York.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 5, 2001
Accepted: Mar 19, 2002
Published online: May 15, 2003
Published in print: Jun 2003
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.