D-SUB: Decision Support System for Subcontracting Construction Works
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 126, Issue 3
Abstract
Letting work to subcontractors is a very common practice in construction industry. Subcontractors help contractors overcome problems including the need of special expertise, shortage in resources, and limitation in finances. The decision to subcontract involves designating work items to be subcontracted and making assignments to subcontractors. Generally, work assignments to subcontractors can be for the total quantity of a work item or a proportion thereof. This paper presents a decision support system that makes assignments to subcontractors of the work items designated for subcontracting. Moreover, the system calculates and plots the overdraft profile based on the financial terms of the contract and project schedule. The ultimate goal of the system is to make work assignments to subcontractors under constraints economical and predict the expected profit at the end of the project. The system encompasses four basic components including project data, linear programming module, sensitivity analysis module, and financial analysis module. The sensitivity analysis adds strength and flexibility to the system by allowing the user to experiment with different scenarios. Finally, the developed system that represents a structured method for making subcontracting decisions is demonstrated through an illustrative example project.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Al-Roumi, A. ( 1994). “Subcontractors bidding practices in Saudi Arabia.” BS thesis. Arch. Engrg. Dept., King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
2.
Au, T., and Hendrickson, C. (1986). “Profit measures for construction projects.”J. Const. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 112(2), 273–286.
3.
Hinze, J., and Tracey, A. (1994). “The contractor-subcontractor relationship: The subcontractor's view.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 120(2), 274–287.
4.
Hsieh, T.-Y. (1998). “Impact of subcontracting on site productivity: Lessons learned in Taiwan.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 124(2), 91–100.
5.
Runeson, G., and Uher, T. E. (1984). “Survey of tendering practices in Australian building industry with reference to subcontractors.” Rep. No. 3, Build. Res. Ctr., School of Build., University of New South Wales, Australia.
6.
Shash, A. A. (1998a). “Subcontractors' bidding decisions.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 124(2), 101–106.
7.
Shash, A. A. (1998b). “Bidding practices of subcontractors in Colorado.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 124(3), 219–225.
8.
Sadonio, M., Tommelein, I., and Zabella, T. (1998). “Management of design detailing process: Key to speciality-contractor performance.” Proc., Int. Computing Congr., Computing in Civ. Engrg., ASCE, Reston, Va., 364–375.
9.
Tommelein, I. D., and Chua, K. H. (1998). “Management of design detailing process: Key to speciality-contractor performance.” Proc., Int. Computing Congr., Computing in Civ. Engrg., Reston, Va., 61–72.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 126 • Issue 3 • May 2000
Pages: 191 - 200
History
Received: Sep 24, 1998
Published online: May 1, 2000
Published in print: May 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.