CPM/LOB: New Methodology to Integrate CPM and Line of Balance
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 120, Issue 3
Abstract
The line‐of‐balance technique (LOB) for planning and scheduling repetitive projects such as houses, high‐rise buildings, precast concrete production, etc., has been used since the 1950s. It has provided unique and useful dimensions to users in perceiving when a project goes out of balance in addition to its essence of capitalizing on the economy of repetition. However, it is still not suitable enough for dealing with repetitive projects where the network of the typical unit is complex and has many branching paths. It is unwieldy in large projects, difficult to update or accelerate, and does not immediately give an accurate measure of the time progress of a project. The critical path method (CPM), on the other hand, is developed to an extent that it predominates in the industry. However, its use on repetitive projects is challenged by its inability to react promptly to the incident problem of changing the sequence of work on the typical units and to maintain work continuity for the working squads. This paper presents a new methodology, CPM/LOB, that adequately integrates the merits of CPM and LOB by attacking the novelty of using resource leveling and the float times calculated by CPM in the LOB. The virtue of the method lies in its invulnerability to changes in the sequence of work and to its ability to maintain work continuity for the working squads of the repetitive activities. It is based on the writers' field experience and extensions of previous researchers' work in the field that was prompted by the necessity.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Al Sarraj, Z. M. (1990). “Formal development of line‐of‐balance.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 116(4), 689–704.
2.
Arditi, D., and Albulak, M. Z. (1986). “Line‐of‐balance scheduling in pavement construction.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 112(3), 411–424.
3.
Birrell, G. S. (1980). “Construction planning—beyond the critical path.” J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 106(3), 389–407.
4.
Carr, M. I., and Meyer, W. L. (1974). “Planning constructon of repetitive building units.” J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 100(3), 403–412.
5.
Clough, R. H., and Sears, G. A. (1991). Construction project management. 3rd Ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
6.
Harris, F. C., and McCaffer, R. (1977). Modern construction management. Crosby Lockwood Staples, London, England.
7.
Kavanagh, D. P. (1985). “SIREN: A Repetitive Construction Simulation Model.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 111(3), 308–323.
8.
Khisty, C. J. (1970). “The application of the ‘Line of Balance’ technique to the construction industry.” Indian Concrete J., (July), 297–320.
9.
Lumsden, P. (1968). The line of balance method. Pergamon Press, London, England.
10.
Neale, R. H., and Neale, D. E. (1989). Construction planning. 1st Ed., Thomas Telford Ltd., London, England.
11.
Neale, R. H., and Raju, B. (1988). “Line of balance planning by spread sheet.” Build. Technol. and Mgmt., (January), 22–27.
12.
O'Brien, J. (1975). “VPM scheduling for high‐rise buildings.” J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 101(4), (December), 895–905.
13.
Perera, S. (1982). “Network planning of projects comprising repetitive activities.” IAHS Conf. on Impact of Economy and Technology, International Association of Housing Science, Vienna, Austria, 927–985.
14.
Person, J. C. (1991). “Who owns the float.” Constr. Briefings, Federal Publications, Inc., 91‐7(June), 1–12.
15.
Pilcher, R. (1976). Principles of construction management. 2nd Ed., McGraw‐Hill Book Company, Ltd., London, England.
16.
Rahbar, F. F., and Rowing, J. E. (1992). “Repetitive activity scheduling process.” AACE Trans., 36th Annu. Meeting, Orlando, Fla., O.5.1–O.5.8.
17.
Russel, A. D., and Wang, W. C. M. (1993). “New generation of planning structures.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 119(2), 196–214.
18.
Selinger, S. (1980). “Construction planning for linear projects.” J. Constr. Div., ASCE. 106(CO2), 195–205.
19.
Shoderbek, P. P., and Digman, L. A. (1967). “Third generation, PERT/LOB.” Harvard Business Rev., 45(5), 100–110.
20.
Suhail, S. A. (1993). “Out‐of‐logic progress.” Cost Engrg., American Association of Cost Engineers, 35(4), 23–28.
21.
Thompson, P. (1981). Organization and economics of construction. McGraw Hill Book Company Ltd., London, England.
22.
Trimble, G. (1984). “Resource‐oriented scheduling.” Proj. Mgmt. J., Project Management Institute, 2(2), 70–74.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 120 • Issue 3 • September 1994
Pages: 667 - 684
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 8, 1993
Published online: Sep 1, 1994
Published in print: Sep 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.