Effect of Testing Variability on Contractor Payment for Asphalt Pavements
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 120, Issue 3
Abstract
Acceptance of asphalt pavements on a lot basis depends on how well the material conforms to specified quality characteristics. If a lot does not fall within the specified tolerance limits for a given characteristic, the contractor payment for that lot may be adjusted according to a predetermined payment schedule. This study evaluated the effect on contractor payment of the variability of the test method. Payment factors based on selected state highway agency specifications, typical of the most commonly used types of acceptance plans, were estimated using simulation techniques. The results were illustrated by plotting the operating characteristics (OC) in terms of expected payment. The OC plots show that the contractor can receive reduced payment even when there is no material variability and the process mean is on target. This reduction was due to the relatively large magnitude of the testing variability as compared with the tolerance range specified in the simulated acceptance plans. The simulation routine developed to estimate contractor payment can, with suitable modifications, be used for any acceptance plan.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Cominsky, R. J., and Kandhal, P. S. (1982). “Statistical acceptance of bituminous paving mixtures.” Research Project 79‐28, Office of Res. and Special Studies, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Dept. of Transp., Harrisburg, Pa.
2.
Dunning, R. L. (1986). “Traps for contractors in statistical specifications in asphalt technology.” Proc. Assoc. of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 56, 33–56.
3.
Fromm, H. J. (1978). “A statistical evaluation of sampling methods and bituminous concrete compaction.” Proc. Assoc. of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 47, 372–397.
4.
Hudson, S. B., Higgins, F. T., and Bowery, F. J. (1972). Determination of statistical parameters for bituminous concrete. Materials Res. and Dev., Inc., Rockville, Md.
5.
Moore, R. M., Mahony, J. P., Hicks, R. G., and Wilson, J. E. (1981). “Overview of pay‐adjustment factors for asphalt concrete mixtures.” Transp. Res. Record 821. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 49–56.
6.
Nnaji, S., Burati, J. L. Jr., and Tarakji, M. G. (1984). “Field validation of statistically based acceptance plan for bituminous airport pavements.” Rep. No. DOT/FAA/PM‐84/12,IV, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C.
7.
Rubinstein, R. Y. (1981). Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method, John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
8.
“Standard practice for preparing precision statements for test methods for construction materials.” (1992). Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA., 04.03.
9.
Weed, R. M. (1985). Interim recommended practice for acceptance plans for highway construction, AASHTO designation: R9‐85. New Jersey Dept. of Transp. Trenton, N.J.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 120 • Issue 3 • September 1994
Pages: 579 - 592
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 27, 1992
Published online: Sep 1, 1994
Published in print: Sep 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.