Constructability Improvement During Field Operations
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 114, Issue 4
Abstract
Constructability issues still exist during field operations and once in the field, constructors can still reap constructability benefits from their actions alone. The objective of this paper is to explore the ways in which construction knowledge and experience can enhance constructability during field operations. While previous constructability research efforts have been primarily directed toward owners and designers, this research is primarily directed toward constructor organizations. The employed research method was an iterative process of issue identification, literature search, site interviews, and analysis. Ultimately, a single prime concept for field operations constructability was concluded: Constructability is enhanced when innovative construction methods are utilized. Innovative construction methods may involve innovations related to sequencing of field tasks, temporary construction materials/systems, hand tools, construction equipment, constructor‐optional preassembly, temporary facilities directly supportive of field methods, or post‐bid constructor preferences. Beyond addressing each of these in detail, in this document “innovative” construction is also analyzed in terms of related prompters or drivers. The linkage between field operations constructability and construction technology is also addressed.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
“Alaskans build under tent.” (1986). Eng. News Rec., Feb. 27, 16.
2.
Armstrong, S., (1983). “Hard‐hat robots may take risk out of dangerous jobs,” Christian Science Monitor, Aug. 30, 6.
3.
Beard, J. L. (1985). “Equipment innovations will boost job efficiency.” Constructor, Nov., 24–28.
4.
Braun, B., and Nash, W. R. (1985). “Ground freezing for construction.” Civ. Eng., ASCE, 55(1), 54–56.
5.
“Channel cable‐laying contest on.” 1983. Eng. News Rec., July 21, 46.
6.
Constructability: A Primer. (1986). Constr. Industry Inst., The Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex., July, 2.
7.
Constructability Concepts File. (1987). Const. Industry Inst., The Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex., Aug., 57–65.
8.
Coven, S. “Marine construction.” Constr. Specifier, June, 95.
9.
Cox, A. (1985). The making of the achiever. Dodd, Mead & Co., New York, N.Y.
10.
Fitzgerald, L. (1982). Installing quality circles, Univ. Assoc., San Diego, Calif.
11.
Foster, R. N. (1986). Innovation: The attacker's advantage, Summit Books, New York, N.Y., 165–184.
12.
“Foundation for a record.” (1985).
13.
Glass, C. C. (1984). “The pipe manipulator: A complete assessment of a new idea in construction equipment technology,” thesis presented to The Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex., Dec.
14.
Godfrey, K. A. (1984). “New tools help find flaws.” Civ. Eng., ASCE, 54(9), 39–42.
15.
Grimm, D., and Parish, W. C. P. (1985). “Foam grout saves tunnel.” Civ. Eng., ASCE, 55(9), 64–66.
16.
Guy, R. B. (1985). “Current and Projected Uses of Robots and Other Forms of Automation on Construction Sites in Japan.” Battelle, Columbus, Ohio, Nov.
17.
Herring, B. L. (1986). Constructor, Sept., 44–46.
18.
Hipley, R. L., and Murphy, D. B. (1983). “Induction bent pipe,” paper presented at the American Gas Assn. Conf., Seattle, Wash., May.
19.
Japan Economic Journal, Nov. 8, 1983, “Underwater Robot Unveiled by Komatsu and Penta‐Ocean,” 9.
20.
Japan Mechatronics Letter, April 20, 1984, “R & D for robotizing construction work has been taking place.” 1.
21.
Lluch, J., and Halpin, D. W. (1982). “Construction operations and microcomputers,” J. Constr. Div., ASCE 108, (CO1), 129–146.
22.
Madewell, C. J. (1986). “Innovative solutions to the challenges of heavy civil projects,” Constr. Innovation: Demands, Successes, and Lessons, ASCE.
23.
Nikkei Sangyo, March 10, 1987, p. 1.
24.
O'Connor, J. T., Rusch, S. E., and Schulz, M. J. (1986). “Constructability improvement during engineering and procurement.” The Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex., May.
25.
“Speed limit for concrete tested.” (1985). Eng. News Rec., Aug. 7, 43.
26.
Stukhart, G., and Chang, D. Y. M. (1987). “Automated material receiving, handling, and inventory: A prototype,” Proc. of the Fourth Int. Symp. on Robotics and Artificial Intelligence in Building Construction, Vol. 2, Israel Inst. of Tech, Haifa, Israel, June, 721–730.
27.
Tatum, C. B. (1986). “Demands and Means for Construction Innovation,” Construction Innovation: Demands, Successes and Lessons, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, N.Y., 37.
28.
Tatum, C. B., Vanegas, J. A., and Williams, J. M. (1986). “Constructability improvement during conceptual planning,” Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., Mar.
29.
Thomson, J. C. (1986). “Microtunneling: no pipe dream.” Civ. Eng., ASCE, 56(8), 56–57.
30.
“Trolleys cut cost of inspecting bridge cables.” (1986). Eng. News Rec., May 15, 58.
31.
“Tunneling shield uses foam to shave tunneling problems.” (1986). Eng. News Rec., Aug. 14, 12–13.
32.
Ueno, T. (1983). “Robotization of spraying work for fire proofing steel structure,” Robot, Mar., 53–61.
33.
Utz, J. H. (1983). “Solving a difficult sewer rehabilitation problem,” Public Works, 114, Mar., 59–60.
34.
Zaist, R. W. (1986). “Demands for innovation in power construction,” Construction Innovations: Demands, Successes and Lessons, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, N.Y., 30.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 114 • Issue 4 • December 1988
Pages: 548 - 564
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 ASCE.
History
Published online: Dec 1, 1988
Published in print: Dec 1988
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.