Geologic Exploration and Risk Reduction in Underground Construction
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 114, Issue 4
Abstract
Geologic uncertainty in underground construction promotes design and construction conservatism and has a significant effect on project cost. Site investigation can reduce this uncertainty and decrease costs by reducing the contingency amounts included in bids. This paper presents research findings that provide a better understanding of how subsurface exploration and improved contractual risk sharing can decrease the cost of underground projects. Issues discussed include: the methodology used by tunneling contractors to estimate geologic profiles given a set of available geologic information; the geologic classification methods used to associate the expected profile with acceptable construction alternatives; the spatial prediction of ground classes and the extents over which different excavation and support methods will be necessary; the factors involved in selecting the initial support, the excavation round length and the estimation of the advance rate; the relationship between exploration, risk allocation, and bidding behavior; the impact of changed conditions clauses in underground construction contracts; the merits of using well‐defined geologic conditions as a basis in unit price contracts; and the magnitude of bid contingencies that are actually used in practice.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Brekke, T. L., and Howard, T. R. (1972). “Stability problems caused by seams and faults,” Proc., North Amer. Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conf., Amer. Inst. of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engrs., 1, 25–41.
2.
Einstein, H. H., et al. (1983). “Comparison of five empirical tunnel classification methods—Accuracy, effect of subjectivity, and available information.” Proc., 5th Int. Cong. of the Int. Soc. for Rock Mech., Melbourne, Apr., Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
3.
Ioannou, P. G. (1984). “The economic value of geologic exploration as a risk reduction strategy in underground construction.” Thesis presented to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, at Cambridge, Mass., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, 414–446.
4.
Ioannou, P. G. (1987). “Geologic prediction model for tunneling.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 113(4), 569–590.
5.
Merritt, A. H. (1972). “Geologic predictions for underground excavations.” Proc., North Amer. Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conf., Amer. Inst. of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engrs., 1, 115–132.
6.
Parker, A. D. (1970). Planning and estimating underground construction. McGraw‐Hill, New York, N.Y.
7.
Robinson, C. S. (1972). “Prediction of geology for tunnel design and construction.” Proc., North Amer. Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conf., Amer. Inst. of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engrs., 1, 105–114.
8.
Stasiewicz, P. H. (1981). “Improving the contractual aspects of underground construction.” Thesis presented to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, at Cambridge, Mass., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Civil Engineer.
9.
“Tunneling: Improved contract practices.” (1978). Rept. 79, British Construction Industry Res. and Information Assoc., London, U.K., May, 60–63.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 ASCE.
History
Published online: Dec 1, 1988
Published in print: Dec 1988
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.