Decisions in Construction Operations
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 111, Issue 4
Abstract
A method for selecting the most desirable construction strategy is proposed in this paper. A decision analysis framework is developed considering the information on relative risk, along with the information on cost, benefit, and consequences of each construction strategy. Many factors affect the safety of construction operations. Labor skill, supervisors' experience and attendance, condition of falsework, weather conditions, type of equipment, level of operator's experience, etc., may be considered as the main factors that affect the safety of construction operations. From an engineering point of view, these factors are always desirable to be in their best states. However, it may not be practical in many cases due to time and money constraints. Consequently, the risk of failure and cost of construction operations, and the consequences of failure need to be estimated in order to decide about the optimum construction strategy. The decision problem is complicated since the state of the factors are generally expressed in linguistic terms. The theory of fuzzy sets is used to translate these terms into mathematical measures and to estimate the risk of failure. The proposed method is illustrated with the help of an example.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Ayyub, B. M., “Structural Safety Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Buildings During Construction,” thesis presented to the Georgia Institute of Technology, at Atlanta, GA, in 1983, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy.
2.
Ayyub, B. M., and Haldar, A., “Project Scheduling Using Fuzzy Set Concepts,” Journal of the Construction Division, ASCE, Vol. 110, No. 2, Proc. Paper 18889, June, 1984, pp. 189–204.
3.
Barrie, D. S., and Paulson, B. C., Jr., Professional Construction Management, McGraw‐Hill Book Co., New York, NY, 1978.
4.
Bellman, R. E., and Zadeh, L. A., “Decision Making in a Fuzzy Environment,” Management Science, Vol. 17, 1970, pp. 141–164.
5.
Blockley, D. I., “Analysis of Structural Failures,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Part I, Vol. 62, London, England, Feb., 1977, pp. 51–73.
6.
Blockley, D. I., “Predicting the Likelihood of Structural Accidents,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Part 2, Vol. 59, London, England, Dec., 1975, pp. 659–668.
7.
Blockley, D. I., “The Calculation of Uncertainty in Civil Engineering,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Part 2, Vol. 67, London, England, 1979, pp. 313–326.
8.
Blockley, D. I., The Nature of Structural Design and Safety, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, England, 1980.
9.
Blockley, D. I., “The Role of Fuzzy Sets in Civil Engineering,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 2, North‐Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1979, pp. 267–278.
10.
Brown, C. B., “A Fuzzy Safety Measure,” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, Vol. 105, Proc. Paper 14915, Oct., 1979, pp. 855–872.
11.
Brown, C. B., and Leonard, R. S., “Subjective Uncertainty Analysis,” presented at the ASCE National Structural Engineering Meeting, Baltimore, MD, Apr. 19–23, 1971, Preprint No. 1388.
12.
Brown, C. B., and Yao, J. T. P., “Fuzzy Sets in Structural Engineering,” Journal of the Structural Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 109, No. 5, May, 1983, pp. 1211–1225.
13.
Brown, C. B., and Yao, J. T. P., “Instruction and Opinions: The Use of Fuzzy Subjectivity,” Architectural Science Review, 1982.
14.
Chameau, J. L. A., Altschaeffl, A. G., Michael, H. L., and Yao, J. T. P., “Potential Application of Fuzzy Sets in Civil Engineering,” presented in the First Workshop on the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, Logan, UT, May, 1982.
15.
Dubois, D., and Prade, H., Fuzzy Sets and System—Theory and Applications, Academic Press, New York, NY, 1980.
16.
Fu, F. S., and Yao, J. T. P., “Pattern Recognition and Damage Assessment,” presented at the Third ASCE EMD Specialty Conference, Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX, Sept. 17–19, 1979.
17.
Gates, M., and Scarpa, A., “Reward‐Risk Ratio,” Journal of the Construction Division, ASCE, Vol. 100, No. CO4, Proc. Paper 10984, Dec., 1974, pp. 521–532.
18.
Hinze, J., “The Effect of Middle Management on Safety in Construction,” Technical Report No. 209, Stanford Univ., Department of Civil Engineering, The Construction Institute, Stanford, CA, July, 1975.
19.
Ishizuka, M., Fu, K. S., and Yao, J. T. P., “A Rule‐Based Inference with Fuzzy Sets for Structural Damage Assessment,” Approximate Reasoning in Decision Analysis, M. M. Gupta and E. Sanchez, Eds., North‐Holland Publishing Co., 1982, pp. 261–268.
20.
Ishizuka, M., Fu, F. S., and Yao, J. T. P., “A Rule‐Inference Method for Damage Assessment,” ASCE, St. Louis, MO, Preprint 81–502, Oct., 1981.
21.
Ishizuka, M., Fu, K. S., and Yao, J. T. P., “SPERIL‐I: Computer Based Structural Damage Assessment System,” Technical Report No. CE‐STR‐81‐36, School of Civil Engineering, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN, 1981.
22.
Kaufman, A., Introduction to the Theory of Fuzzy Subsets, Academic Press, New York, NY, 1975 (translated by D. L. Seanson).
23.
Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H., Decision with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade Offs, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1976.
24.
Levitt, R. E., and Henry, W. P., “Reducing Construction Accidents—Top Management's Role,” Journal of the Construction Division, ASCE, Vol. 102, No. CO3, Proc. Paper 12384, Sept., 1976, pp. 465–478.
25.
Manual of Accident Prevention in Construction, 6th ed., The Associated General Contractors of America, Washington, D.C., 1971.
26.
Moses, F., and Yao, J. T. P., “Safety Evaluation of Buildings and Bridges,” Technical Report No. CE‐STR‐83‐24, School of Civil Engineering, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN, 1983.
27.
Nahmias, S., “Fuzzy Variables,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 1, 1978, pp. 97–110.
28.
Samelson, N. M., “The Effect of Foremen on Safety in Construction,” Technical Report No. 219, Stanford Univ., Department of Civil Engineering, The Construction Institute, Stanford, CA, June, 1977.
29.
“The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970,” P.L. 91‐596 (OSHA 2001), U.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, Washington, DC, Dec., 1970.
30.
Yao, J. T. P., “Damage Assessment and Reliability Evaluation of Existing Structures,” Journal of Engineering Structures, Vol. 1, Oct., 1979, pp. 245–251.
31.
Yao, J. T. P., “Damage Assessment of Existing Structures,” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, Vol. 106, No. EM4, Proc. Paper 15653, Aug., 1980, pp. 785–799.
32.
Zadeh, L. A., “Fuzzy Sets,” Information and Control, Vol. 8, 1965, pp. 338–353.
33.
Zadeh, L. A., “Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC‐3, No. 1, Jan., 1973, pp. 28–44.
34.
Zadeh, L. A., “Probability Measures of Fuzzy Events,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 23, 1968, pp. 421–427.
35.
Zadeh, L. A., Fu, K. S., Tamaka, K., and Shirmara, J., Fuzzy Sets and Their Application to Cognitive and decision Processes, Academic Press, New York, NY, 1975.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 111 • Issue 4 • December 1985
Pages: 343 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 ASCE.
History
Published online: Dec 1, 1985
Published in print: Dec 1985
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.