Technical Papers
Jul 11, 2024

Comparison of Surface Bonded Piezoelectric Transducers and Concrete Vibrational Sensors in Damage Detection of Reinforced Concrete Beams

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 29, Issue 4

Abstract

Reinforced concrete (RC) construction stands as one of the most prevalent engineering endeavors, underscoring the importance of routine structural health assessments. Numerous factors, including overloading, design deficiencies, and fatigue, pose risks to RC structures by inducing cracks in various components. These damages significantly compromise the strength of RC constructions, necessitating vigilant monitoring to avert catastrophic structural failures. Structural health monitoring (SHM) techniques primarily aim to detect such damages. Leveraging piezoelectric (PZT) principles, the electromechanical impedance (EMI) methodology emerges as a promising SHM approach. EMI relies on variations in responses recorded through the electromechanical interaction between PZT and the structure to identify structural damages. Admittance signatures, comprising conductance (G) and susceptance (B), serve as indicators of structural condition, with deviations in the plot of G across a frequency range signaling structural deterioration. PZT transducers, either embedded within the structure or surface bonded, facilitate damage monitoring. This study aims to assess the damage detection capabilities of surface bonded PZT and embedded concrete vibrational sensors (CVS) in grade M25 RC beams. The root mean square deviation (RMSD) serves as the damage index, derived from variations in signatures recorded at different load levels. Experimental testing, conducted on nine RC beam specimens using a universal testing machine (UTM), yielded reliable results for comparison. Comparative analysis between surface bonded PZT and embedded CVS evaluated their performance in detecting structural anomalies under various load levels using RMSD values. Baseline conductance signatures revealed a lower amplitude for CVS due to inherent damping effects within the concrete material. Additionally, CVS consistently displayed lower RMSD values than PZT across different load levels, indicating lesser sensitivity to surface cracks and defects owing to its embedded position within the concrete.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors express gratitude for the completion of this research paper. Our combined efforts in literature review collection, analysis of test results and paper finalization have been instrumental in bringing this work to fruition. Together, we have navigated the complexities of research, contributing our respective skills and knowledge to every aspect of this project. We acknowledge and appreciate each other’s dedication and commitment throughout this journey. This paper stands as a testament to our collaboration and shared pursuit of academic excellence.

References

Aktan, A. E., F. N. Catbas, K. A. Grimmelsman, M. Pervizpour, J. M. Curtis, K. Shen, and X. Qin. 2002. “Health monitoring for effective management of infrastructure.” Smart Struct. Mater. 4935 (1): 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.472575.
Annamdas, V., M. Radhika, and C. K. Soh. 2009. “Health monitoring of concrete structures using embedded PZT transducers based electromechanical impedance model.” Sens. Smart Struct. Technol. Civ. Mech. Aerosp. Syst. 7292 (1): 723–731. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.815407.
Annamdas, V. G. M., Y. Yang, and C. K. Soh. 2010. “Impedance based concrete monitoring using embedded PZT sensors.” Int. Civ. Struct. Eng. 1 (3): 414–424.
Balamonica, K., T. J. Saravanan, C. B. Priya, and N. Gopalakrishnan. 2020. “Piezoelectric sensor–based damage progression in concrete through serial/parallel multi-sensing technique.” Struct. Health Monit. 2019 (1): 18. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1475921719845153.
Bhalla, S., and C. Soh. 2003. “Structural impedance based damage diagnosis by piezo-transducers.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 32 (12): 1897–1916. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.307.
Bhalla, S., and C. Soh. 2004. “Structural health monitoring by piezo-impedance transducers. I: Modeling.” J. Aerosp. Eng. 17 (4): 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2004)17:4(154.
Chalioris, C. E., V. K. Kytinou, M. E. Voutetaki, and C. G. Karayannis. 2021. “Flexural damage diagnosis in reinforced concrete beams using a wireless admittance monitoring system—Tests and finite element analysis.” Sensors 21 (3): 679. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21030679.
Chalioris, C. E., N. A. Papadopoulos, G. M. Angeli, C. G. Karayannis, A. A. Liolios, and C. P. Providakis. 2015a. “Damage evaluation in shear-critical reinforced concrete beam using piezoelectric transducers as smart aggregates.” Open Eng. 5 (1): 20. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2015-0046.
Chalioris, C. E., C. P. Providakis, M. J. Favvata, N. A. Papadopoulos, G. M. Angeli, and C. G. Karayannis. 2015b. “Experimental application of a wireless earthquake damage monitoring system (WiAMS) using PZT transducers in reinforced concrete beams.” WIT Trans. Built. Environ. 152 (Sep): 233–243. https://doi.org/10.2495/eres150191.
Han, F., Q. Zhang, C. Wang, G. Lu, and J. Jiang. 2020. “Structural health monitoring of timber using electromechanical impedance (EMI) technique.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020 (Jul): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1906289.
Heico. 2015. Hydraulic & engineering instruments catalogue, India. New Delhi, India: Heico Engineering.
Hu, X., H. Zhu, and D. Wang. 2014. “A study of concrete slab damage detection based on the electromechanical impedance method.” Sensors 14 (10): 19897–19909. https://doi.org/10.3390/s141019897.
Huynh, T.-C., N.-L. Dang, and J.-T. Kim. 2017. “Advances and challenges in impedance-based structural health monitoring.” Struct. Monit. Maintenance 4 (4): 301–329. https://doi.org/10.12989/smm.2017.4.4.301.
IS (Indian Standard). 2008. Indian standard code of high strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement—Specification. IS 1786. New Delhi, India: IS.
IS (Indian Standard). 2021. Indian Standard code of practice for general structural use of plain and reinforced concrete. IS 456. New Delhi, India: IS.
Karayannis, C. G., C. E. Chalioris, G. M. Angeli, N. A. Papadopoulos, M. J. Favvata, and C. P. Providakis. 2016. “Experimental damage evaluation of reinforced concrete steel bars using piezoelectric sensors.” Constr. Build. Mater. 105 (Feb): 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.019.
Khante, S. N., and S. R. Gedam. 2016. “PZT based smart aggregate for unified health monitoring of RC structures.” Open J. Civ. Eng. 6 (1): 42–49. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2016.61005.
Kocherla, A., and K. V. Subramaniam. 2020. “Embedded smart PZT-based sensor for internal damage detection in concrete under applied compression.” Measurement 163 (Oct): 108018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108018.
Laskar, A., H. Gu, Y. L. Mo, and G. Song. 2009. “Progressive collapse of a two-story reinforced concrete frame with embedded smart aggregates.” Smart Mater. Struct. 18 (7): 075001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/18/7/075001.
Li, H., Y. Zhang, and G. Wang. 2020. “Global vibration-based structural health monitoring of wind turbines using piezoelectric sensors.” Renewable Energy 145 (Jan): 1019–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.086.
Lim, Y. Y., and C. K. Soh. 2014. “Electro-mechanical impedance (EMI)–Based incipient crack monitoring and critical crack identification of beam structures.” Res. Nondestr. Eval. 25 (2): 82–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/09349847.2013.848311.
Narayanan, A., and K. V. L. Subramaniam. 2016. “Experimental evaluation of load-induced damage in concrete from distributed microcracks to localized cracking on electro-mechanical impedance response of bonded PZT.” Constr. Build. Mater. 105 (Feb): 536–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.148.
Papadopoulos, E., S. A. Karaiskos, and K. J. Perdikaris. 2015. “Assessment of concrete beam damage under shear/flexural monotonic and cyclic stress using PZT sensors.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (10): 04015026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001234.
Park, G., H. Cudney, and D. Inman. 2000. “An integrated health monitoring technique using structural impedance sensors.” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 11 (6): 448–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/104538900772664611.
PI Ceramics. 2012. Product information catalogue. Germany: PI Ceramics.
Providakis, C. P., G. M. Angeli, M. J. Favvata, N. A. Papadopoulos, C. E. Chalioris, and C. G. Karayannis. 2014. Detection of concrete reinforcement damage using piezoelectric materials—Analytical and experimental study. Genève: Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1090964.
Providakis, C. P., K. D. Stefanaki, M. E. Voutetaki, Y. Tsompanakis, and M. Stavroulaki. 2013. “Damage detection in concrete structures using a simultaneously activated multi-mode PZT active sensing system: Numerical modelling.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 10 (11): 1451–1468.https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.831908.
Sabet Divsholi, B., and Y. Yang. 2014. “Combined embedded and surface-bonded piezoelectric transducers for monitoring of concrete structures.” NDT & E Int. 65 (Jul): 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2014.03.009.
Shanker, R. 2009. An integrated approach for structural health monitoring. Delhi, India: Indian Institute of Technology.
Smith, J., A. Johnson, and K. Brown. 2018. “Global vibration monitoring of civil structures using piezoelectric sensors.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (10): 04018167. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002163.
Song, G., H. Gu, and Y.-L. Mo. 2008. “Smart aggregates: Multi-functional sensors for concrete structures-a tutorial and a review.” Smart Mater. Struct. 17 (3): 033001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/17/3/033001.
Song, G., C. Wang, and B. Wang. 2017. “Structural health monitoring (SHM) of civil structures.” Appl. Sci. 7 (8): 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7080789.
Thomas, A. M., K. R. Pradeep, and P. Mathew. 2016. “Structural health monitoring using piezoelectric sensors and actuators.” Appl. Mech. Mater. 857 (Feb): 255–260. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.857.255.
Wang, D. S., Z. Li, S. S. Zhang, and H. P. Zhu. 2013. “Experimental study on sensitivity of embedded PZT impedance transducers to crack damage of reinforced concrete beam.” In Proc., 13th Int. Symp. on Structural Engineering. Seoul: International Association for Structural Engineering and Mechanics.
Wang, Z., L. Chen, and Q. Liu. 2019. “Integration of piezoelectric sensors for global vibration-based structural health monitoring in bridges.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 26 (11): e2391. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2391.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 29Issue 4November 2024

History

Received: Nov 30, 2023
Accepted: Apr 16, 2024
Published online: Jul 11, 2024
Published in print: Nov 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 11, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Punjab Engineering College (Deemed to be University), Chandigarh, Punjab 160012, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1281-5608. Email: [email protected]
Sarita Singla [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Punjab Engineering College (Deemed to be University), Chandigarh, Punjab 160012, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share