Technical Papers
Jul 18, 2024

Seismic Risk Mapping of Bridges Using HAZUS and ArcGIS: The Case of Surat City, India

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 29, Issue 4

Abstract

Earthquakes are one of the most common natural disasters resulting in loss of life and property. A method for reducing damage and fatalities is to evaluate the fragility, i.e., determining the degree of an earthquake susceptibility of a structure using structural analysis. Bridges are categorized as lifeline constructions, as they must be operational in the case of an earthquake. The closure of damaged bridges due to unsatisfactory working conditions might have an adverse impact on everyday traffic. The proposed research would look into the seismic danger that bridges represent located in Surat city of Gujarat. In this work, nonlinear static analysis has been used for investigation. The fragility function has been used to evaluate damage to bridges of varied spans, material quality based on Indian seismic provisions. This investigation can keep track of the possibility of specific damaging circumstances. Using the HAZUS approach, a probability damage assessment has been done. Using ArcGIS software, the likelihood, size, and severity of bridges in Surat have been evaluated. The distinction of present study lies in extending beyond the confines of the HAZUS technical manual, which primarily focuses on generating damage state probabilities for bridges. In this study, author moves a step further by applying this technique to a specific set of bridges, allowing to observe variations in damage state parameters across different bridge types. This approach enables easy comparisons between various bridges, aiding in the identification of specific risk factors and informing subsequent measures for risk mitigation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, model, or codes supporting this study’s findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Baker, J. W. 2007. “Measuring bias in structural response caused by ground motion scaling.” Pac. Conf. Earthquake Eng. 56 (Dec): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.
Cavalcante, G. H. F., E. M. V. Pereira, I. D. Rodrigues, L. C. M. Vieira Júnior, J. E. Padgett, and G. H. Siqueira. 2022. “Seismic fragility assessment of typical bridges in Northeastern Brazil.” Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct. 19 (5): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78257062.
ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute). 2015. ArcGIS desktop: Release 10.3, 315–325. Redlands, CA: ESRI.
Fang, C., B. Ping, Y. Zheng, Y. Ping, and H. Ling. 2023. “Seismic fragility and loss estimation of self-centering steel braced frames under mainshock-aftershock sequences.” J. Build. Eng 73 (Aug): 106433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106433.
FEMA. 2022. Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology earthquake model Hazus®–MH MR5 technical manual. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Guo, W., Y. Hu, H. Liu, and D. Bu. 2019. “Seismic performance evaluation of typical piers of China’s high-speed railway bridge line using pushover analysis.” Math. Probl. Eng. 2019 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9514769.
IRC (Indian Roads Congress). 2018. Guideline for seismic design of road bridges. IRC SP:114. New Delhi, India: IRC.
Masrilayanti, M., A. P. Nasution, R. Kurniawan, J. Tanjung, and S. Sarmayenti. 2021. “Fragility curve analysis of medium cable stayed bridge.” Civ. Environ. Eng. 17 (1): 209–218. https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2021-0022.
Nettis, A., D. Raffaele, and G. Uva. 2021. “Simplified fragility analysis of multi-span isostatic RC-bridges considering an incomplete knowledge level.” In Proc. Compdyn, 3389–3406. Athens, Greece: National Technical Univ. of Athens.
Perdomo, C., R. Monteiro, and H. Sucuoğlu. 2022. “Development of fragility curves for single-column RC Italian bridges using nonlinear static analysis.” J. Earthquake Eng. 26 (5): 2328–2352. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1760153.
Pisal, A. Y., and R. S. Jangid. 2016. “Vibration control of bridge subjected to multi-axle vehicle using multiple tuned mass friction dampers.” Int. J. Adv. Struct. Eng. 8 (Mar): 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-016-0124-y.
Shimpi, V., M. V. R. Sivasubramanian, S. B. Singh, and D. K. Periyasamy. 2021. “Seismic vulnerability assessment and fragility curves for a multistorey gallery arch bridge.” SN Appl. Sci. 3 (6): 662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04652-y.
Soneji, B. B., and R. S. Jangid. 2006. “Effectiveness of seismic isolation for cable-stayed bridges.” Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 6 (1): 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455406001836.
Stefanidou, S., A. Karatzetzou, G. Tsinidis, S. Mitoulis, and S. Argyroudis. 2022. “Multi-hazard fragility assessment of bridges: Methodology and case study application.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. Natural Hazards and Infrastructure, 1–9. Athens, Greece: Innovation Center on Natural Hazards & Infrastructure.
Stefanidou, S. P., and A. J. Kappos. 2015. “Methodology for the development of structure-specific fragility curves for bridges in a roadway network.” In Proc., COMPDYN 2015-5th Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1780–1798, 1–9. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.7712/120115.3501.1072.
Tarafder, N., and L. V. M. Prasad. 2020. “Seismic performance of box girder bridge with non-linear static pushover analysis.” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. 11 (2): 897–904.
Wang, P. H., K. C. Chang, D. C. Dzeng, T. K. Lin, H. H. Hung, and W. C. Cheng. 2021. “Seismic evaluation of reinforced concrete bridges using capacity-based inelastic displacement spectra.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 50 (7): 1845–1863. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3425.
Yang, Y., D. Jiao, and H. Song. 2021. “Pushover analysis in different lateral force distribution patterns of bridge piers.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 647 (1): 012023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/647/1/012023.
Yi, H., S. Zhang, F. Zhao, and G. Min. 2021. “Research on seismic fragility analysis of regular bridges based on response spectrum analysis method.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 638 (1): 012061. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/638/1/012061.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 29Issue 4November 2024

History

Received: Sep 15, 2023
Accepted: Apr 5, 2024
Published online: Jul 18, 2024
Published in print: Nov 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 18, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Rajat Dabral [email protected]
Postgraduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat, Gujarat 395007, India. Email: [email protected]
Rahul Chaudhary, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat, Gujarat 395007, India. Email: [email protected]
Vishisht Bhaiya [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat, Gujarat 395007, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share