Estimating Prestressed Concrete Bridge Reliability and Rating Factors Using Bayesian Networks with an Application to a Bridge Made Continuous for Live Load
Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 29, Issue 4
Abstract
The bridge inspection process has multiple steps. One obvious element is for inspectors to identify defects in the main components of the structural system and assign condition ratings. These condition ratings are somewhat subjective because they are influenced by the experience of the inspector. In the current work, processes were developed for making inferences on the reliability of prestressed concrete (PC) girders with defects at the girder component level. The Bayesian network (BN) tools constructed in this study use simple structural mechanics to model the capacity of girders. Expert opinion is used to link defects that can be observed during inspections to underlying deterioration mechanisms. By linking these deterioration mechanisms with changes in mechanical properties, inferences on the reliability of a bridge can be made based on visual observation of defects. The BN can then be used to directly determine the rating factor (RF) of individual structural elements. Examples are provided using BNs to evaluate an existing older PC bridge currently behaving as two simply supported spans. The bridge is modeled using two scenarios with the spans acting as simply supported, and then also with the link block (continuity joint) repaired so that the spans are continuous for live load. The spans are considered simply supported for all dead load.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Applicable items are Netica BN models.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the US Army Corps of Engineers for the use of as-built data for bridges in the current inventory. Additionally, support from the US Army and Corps (through participation in ERDC-University and funding of Projects 476923 and 154349) is acknowledged.
References
AASHTO. 2011. Manual for bridge evaluation. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2013. Manual for bridge element inspection. 1st ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2014. LRFD bridge design specifications. 7th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2017. LRFD bridge design specifications. 8th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2018. Manual for bridge evaluation, with 2019 interim revisions. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2020. LRFD bridge design specifications, with 2021 errata. 9th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2013. Report on nondestructive test methods for evaluation of concrete in structures-228.2R. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Report on methods for estimating in-place concrete strength-228.1R. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Ballester, L., J. López, and J. M. Pavía. 2023. “European systemic credit risk transmission using bayesian networks.” Res. Int. Bus. Finance 65 (Apr): 101914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.101914.
Bertola, N. J., G. Henriques, T. Schumacher, and E. Brühwiler. 2022. “Engineering of existing structures: The need and place for non-destructive evaluation.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on Nondestructive Testing in Civil Engineering. Lausanne, Switzerland: EPFL Scientific Publications.
Campbell, L., L. Snyder, J. Whitehead, R. Connor, and J. Lloyd. 2019. Probability of detection study for visual inspection of steel bridges: Volume 2 - full project report. Indianapolis: Indiana Dept. of Transportation.
Casey, C. 2019. “Ultra-high performance concrete for connections of precast, prestressed girders made continuous for live load.” M.S. thesis, School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science, Univ. of Oklahoma.
Enright, M., and D. Frangopol. 1999. “Condition prediction of deteriorating concrete bridges using bayesian updating.” J. Struct. Eng. 125 (10): 1118–1125. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:10(1118).
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2022. National bridge inventory. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Freyermuth, C. 1969. “Design of continuous highway bridges with precast, prestressed concrete girders.” PCI J. 14 (2): 14–39. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.04011969.14.39.
Groeneveld, A., S. Wood, E. Ruiz, and J. Roberts. 2021. Estimating bridge reliability by using Bayesian networks. Washington, DC: USACE.
Heckerman, D., and M. P. Wellman. 1995. “Bayesian networks.” Commun. ACM 38 (3): 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/203330.203336.
LeBeau, K. 2008. “A bi-directional load rating model of the flexural response of a prestressed concrete bridge beam element.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern Univ.
LeBeau, K., and S. Wadia-Fascetti. 2010. “Predictive and diagnostic load rating model of a prestressed concrete bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (4): 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000073.
Looney, T., J. Volz, and R. Floyd. 2021. “Behavior of a 3-span continuous bridge before and after continuity joint replacement using ultra-high-performance concrete.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 35 (6): 04021087. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001667.
McLachlan, S., K. Dube, G. Hitman, N. Fenton, and E. Kyrimi. 2020. “Bayesian networks in healthcare: Distribution by medical condition.” Artif. Intell. Med. 107 (Mar): 101912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101912.
Moore, M., B. Pares, B. Graybeal, D. Rolander, G. Washer, and J. Wiss. 2001. Reliability of visual inspection for highway bridges volume 1. McLean, VA: Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center.
Nizamoff, D. 2023. “UHPC link slabs and the wilmington viaduct bridge rehabilitation project.” In Vol. 3 of Proc., Int. Interactive Symp. on Ultra-High Performance Concrete. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Digital Press.
Norsys. 2019. Netica 6.07. Vancouver, Canada: Norsys Software.
Nowak, A. 1995. “Calibration of LRFD bridge code.” J. Struct. Eng. 121 (8): 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:8(1245).
Nowak, A., and K. Collins. 2012. Reliability of structures. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Nowak, A., and M. Szerszen. 2000. “Structural reliability as applied to highway bridges.” Prog. Struct. Mater. Eng. 2 (2): 218–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/1528-2716(200004/06)2:2%3C218::AID-PSE27%3E3.0.CO;2-8.
Nowak, A., A. Yamani, and S. Tabsh. 1994. “Probabilistic models for resistance of concrete bridge girders.” Am. Concr. Inst. Struct. J. 91 (3): 269–276.
Roberts, J. 2023. “A bayesian network-based methodology for improved bridge load rating and asset management.” Doctoral thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Portland State Univ.
Roberts, J., E. Ruiz, A. Groeneveld, and R. Pérez-Gracia. 2019. “Use of bayesian networks for inferences on bridge safety.” In Proc., 98th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (presentation no. 19-04278). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Seijas-Macías, A., and A. Oliveira. 2012. “An approach to distributions of the product of two normal variables.” Discuss. Math. Probab. Stat. 32 (1–2): 87–99. https://doi.org/10.7151/dmps.1146.
Stone, J. V. 2013. Bayes’ rule: A tutorial Introduction to Bayesian analysis. Sheffield, UK: Sebtel Press. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1371.6801.
Straub, D., and A. Der Kiureghian. 2010a. “Bayesian network enhanced with structural reliability methods: Application.” J. Eng. Mech. 136 (10): 1259–1270. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000170.
Straub, D., and A. Der Kiureghian. 2010b. “Bayesian network enhanced with structural reliability methods: Methodology.” J. Eng. Mech. 136 (10): 1248–1258. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000173.
Straub, D., and I. Papaioannou. 2014. “Bayesian updating with structural reliability methods.” J. Eng. Mech. 141 (3): 04014134. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000839.
TxDOT (Texas Department of Transportation). 2001. Bridge design manual. Austin, TX: TxDOT.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 29 • Issue 4 • November 2024
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 28, 2023
Accepted: Apr 2, 2024
Published online: Jul 17, 2024
Published in print: Nov 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 17, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Bridge components
- Bridge engineering
- Bridges
- Bridges (by material)
- Business management
- Concrete bridges
- Defects and imperfections
- Engineering mechanics
- Girders
- Live loads
- Management methods
- Materials characterization
- Materials engineering
- Practice and Profession
- Ratings
- Static loads
- Statics (mechanics)
- Structural analysis
- Structural engineering
- Structural members
- Structural systems
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.