Technical Papers
Apr 13, 2024

Economic Optimization of Flood Bypass Capacity

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 150, Issue 6

Abstract

Flood bypasses are used in regional flood management to reduce flood risk and damage by routing substantial flood flows to a supplementary river channel to lower flood stages in the usual river mainstem. Design, operations, and modifications to flood bypasses commonly employ hydraulic analysis and evaluation. Economics of flood bypasses is usually considered only in terms of feasibility, and bypass design is rarely optimized economically. The literature lacks formal integration of economics, engineering, and hydrology for flood bypasses. Economically analyzed flood bypass systems better incorporate bypasses into flood management, reflecting and balancing the range of costs, impacts, and opportunities of bypasses. This paper presents a method to integrate economics, hydrology, and engineering for flood bypass planning. An economic optimization model is developed based on a cost–benefit analysis. The optimization suggests and explores a preferred economic flood bypass capacity. A preliminary analysis is developed, with a base case that includes benefits from flood risk reduction only. Costs include for a levee setback, weir widening, and land use. The optimization model is applied preliminarily to California’s Yolo Bypass. With the simplification of unlimited land availability, the model results suggest an optimal Yolo Bypass capacity expansion of approximately 5,800  m3/s. The expansion suggested is close to the Department of Water Resources (DWR) stated objective in their 2017 Central Valley Flood Protection Plan and part of the Basin-Wide Feasibility Studies Sacramento River Basin, part of the Central Valley Flood Management Program of 2017. The model is also applied to the Mississippi River Basin’s, New Madrid Birds Point Bypass and Morganza Floodway. In all cases, actual and theoretically optimal bypass capacities agree in their general behavior. This paper provides a framework for decision analysis. This method can better inform policymakers and stakeholders on bypass design and structural modifications and long-term flood management strategy.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful for support from the Center for Watershed Sciences at UC Davis, and funding from Stephen D Bechtel Jr Foundation.

References

Begum, S., M. J. Stive, and J. W. Hall, eds. 2007. Vol. 25 of Flood risk management in Europe: Innovation in policy and practice. New York: Springer.
Bobee, B., G. Cavadias, F. Ashkar, J. Bernier, and P. Rasmussen. 1993. “Towards a systematic approach to comparing distributions used in flood frequency analysis.” J. Hydrol. 142 (1–4): 121–136.
Bozkurt, S., P. Dekens, R. Gartland, J. Gragg, J. Lawyer, and M. McGoogan. 2000. “Evaluation of setback levees on the Sacramento River.” Ph.D. thesis, UC Santa Barbara, Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, Univ. of California.
Chovanec, A., et al. 2000. “Constructed inshore zones as river corridors through urban areas–The Danube in Vienna: Preliminary results.” Regul. Rivers: Res. Manage. 16 (2): 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(200003/04)16:2%3C175::AID-RRR578%3E3.0.CO;2-C.
Day, J. W., R. Hunter, G. P. Kemp, M. Moerschbaecher, and C. G. Brantley. 2021. “The ‘problem’ of New Orleans and diminishing sustainability of Mississippi River management–future options.” Water 13 (6): 813. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13060813.
DWR (California Department of Water Resources). 2010. Sacramento River flood control project weirs and flood relief structures. Sacramento, CA: DWR.
DWR (California Department of Water Resources). 2016. “Sacramento River Basin-Wide feasibility study.” Accessed December 12, 2016. https://water.ca.gov/Programs/Flood-Management/Flood-Planning-and-Studies/Basin-wide-feasibility-studies.
DWR (California Department of Water Resources). 2017. “Central Valley flood protection plan 2017 update.” Accessed September 13, 2018. https://water.ca.gov/-/media/DWR-Website/Web-Pages/Programs/Flood-Management/Flood-Planning-and-Studies/Central-Valley-Flood-Protection-Plan/Files/2017-CVFPP-Update-FINAL_a_y19.pdf.
Eisenstein, W., and L. Mozingo. 2013. Valuing central valley floodplains—A framework for floodplain management decisions. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Berkeley.
FEMA. 2016. “Guidance for flood risk analysis and mapping.” Accessed December 11, 2016. https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-02/Coastal_Flood_Frequency_and_Extreme_Value_Analysis_Guidance_Nov_2016.pdf.
Government of the Netherlands. 2012. “Room for the River. Safety for four million people in the Dutch delta.” Accessed March 4, 2016. https://issuu.com/ruimtevoorderivier/docs/rvdr_corp_brochure_eng__def._.
Hanak, E. 2011. Managing California’s water: From conflict to reconciliation. San Francisco: Public Policy Institution of California.
James, A. L., and M. B. Singer. 2008. “Development of the lower Sacramento Valley flood-control system: Historical perspective.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 9 (3): 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2008)9:3(125).
Jones, C. 2013. “Application of optimization modeling to examine the benefits of expanding the Sacramento River watershed bypass system.” MS thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California Davis.
Jonkman S. N., M. Brinkhuis-Jak, and K. Kok. 2004. Cost benefit analysis and flood damage mitigation in the Netherlands. Delft, Netherlands: HERON.
Kuo, L., M. Kelly, V. Chiang, N. Tabrizy, and P-L Wu. 2023. “Rural areas sacrificed for Xi Jinping’s New City, satellite imagery shows.” Washington Post. Accessed August 31, 2023. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/08/31/china-floods-beijing-rain/.
Ludy, J., and G. M. Kondolf. 2012. “Flood risk perception in lands ‘protected’ by 100-year levees.” Nat. Hazards 61 (2): 829–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-0072-6.
Miller, N. L., K. E. Bashford, and E. Strem. 2003. “Potential impacts of climate change on California hydrology 1.” J. Am. Water Resour. Plann. Assoc. 39 (4): 771–784.
Morgan, A. E. 1950. The Miami Conservancy District. New York: McGraw-Hill Book.
Pittock, J., and M. Xu. 2011. “Controlling Yangtze River floods: A new approach.” World Resources Report 2010: Decision making in a changing climate. Accessed November 11, 2017. www.worldresourcesreport.org.
Plate, E. J. 1999. “Flood risk management: A strategy to cope with floods.” In Proc., European Meeting on the Oder Flood, 115–128. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago.
Plate, E. J. 2002. “Flood risk and flood management.” J. Hydrol. 267 (Mar): 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00135-X.
Schanze, J., E. Zeman, and J. Marsalek. 2006. Flood risk management: Hazards, vulnerability and mitigation measures. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Serra-Llobet, A., et al. 2022a. “Restoring rivers and floodplains for habitat and flood risk reduction: Experiences in multi-benefit floodplain management from California and Germany.” Front. Environ. Sci. 9 (Mar): 778568.
Serra-Llobet, A., G. M. Kondolf, F. Magdaleno, and D. Keenan-Jones. 2022b. “Flood diversions and bypasses: Benefits and challenges.” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Water 9 (1): e1562. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1562.
Siclari, A. 2018. Hydro-economic analysis of flood bypasses. Ph.D. thesis, Dept. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis.
Sommer, T., B. Harrell, M. Nobriga, R. Brown, P. Moyle, W. Kimmerer, and L. Schemel. 2001. “California’s Yolo Bypass: Evidence that flood control can be compatible with fisheries, wetlands, wildlife, and agriculture.” Fisheries 26 (8): 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(2001)026%3C0006:CYB%3E2.0.CO;2.
Stedinger, J. R., and V. W. Griffis. 2008. “Flood frequency analysis in the United States: Time to update.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 13 (4): 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:4(199).
Suddeth, R. J. 2014. “Multi-objective analysis for ecosystem reconciliation on an engineered floodplain: The Yolo Bypass in California’s central valley.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Hydrologic Sciences, Univ. of California, Davis.
Te Boekhorst, D., T. Smits, X. Yu, L. Li, G. Lei, and C. Zhang. 2010. “Implementing integrated river basin management in China.” Ecol. Soc. 15 (2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03369-150223.
UNDRO. 1991. Mitigating natural disasters; Phenomena, effects and options. UNDRO/MND/1990 Manual. Geneva: United Nations Publication.
USACE. 1994. “USACE engineer manual No. 1110-2-1601.” Accessed April 20, 2017. https://www.publications.usace.army.mil/portals/76/publications/engineermanuals/em_1110-2-1601.pdf.
USACE. 2017a. “Birds point-new Madrid floodway.” Accessed November 10, 2017. https://www.mvd.usace.army.mil/Portals/52/docs/MRC/Floodways.pdf?ver=2017-08-03-150414-760.
USACE. 2017b. “USACE engineering and design, management of water control systems.” Accessed November 11, 2017. https://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/EM_1110-2-3600.pdf.
van Alphen, S. 2020. Room for the river: Innovation, or tradition? The case of the Noordwaard. In Adaptive strategies for water heritage, edited by C. Hein. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Zhu, T., and J. R. Lund. 2009. “Up or out? Economic-engineering theory of flood levee height and setback.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 135 (2): 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2009)135:2(90).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 150Issue 6June 2024

History

Received: Apr 29, 2023
Accepted: Jan 2, 2024
Published online: Apr 13, 2024
Published in print: Jun 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Sep 13, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Water Resources Engineer, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
J. R. Lund, Dist.M.ASCE [email protected]
Distinguished Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616. Email: [email protected]
Engineer, Tucson Water, 201 N Stone Ave., Tucson, AZ 85726. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share