Case Studies
Dec 20, 2023

Cost Efficiency Assessment of Four Pressure Management Methods in Water Distribution Systems

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 150, Issue 3

Abstract

The aim of this study is to identify the most feasible pressure management (PM) method financially among four available PM methods [i.e., Fixed Outlet (FO), Time Modulated (TM), Flow Modulated (FM), and Remote Node Modulated (RNM) PM] recently introduced to EPANET source code by our previous study. For that, the four PM methods are tested in 18 different water distribution systems (WDSs), which differ in size, demand pattern, and amount of leakage. PM is inevitable for WDSs; if not applied, leakage flow rate, pipe bursts, active leakage control (ALC) efforts, and indirect water and energy losses increase abundantly. This circumstance increases expenditures due to augmentations in the amount of water entering the network and allocations from the municipal budget for pipe bursts, ALC activities, and energy consumption. Equipment and construction costs must be considered when PM is planned. However, leakage flows, pipe bursts, ALC activity efforts, and indirect water and energy losses are reduced with PM application, generating economic benefits. Four PM methods bring different levels of economic benefits. The cost-benefit analysis of each method has been performed, and the method that brings the maximum benefit (maximum cost reduction) has been determined. It has been revealed that the most applicable PM method, according to the cost-benefit analysis, varies according to the unit water cost. The RNM PM method is found to be the most appropriate when the unit water cost is high. As the unit water cost decreases, FO PM or TM PM becomes the most appropriate PM method instead of RNM PM. However, when the demand pattern of the network is smooth, the most feasible method becomes FO PM, and when the demand pattern is peaked while the unit water cost is relatively low, TM PM becomes the most applicable method.

Practical Applications

It is known that four pressure management methods can be applied in water distribution systems. These are Fixed Outlet, Time Modulated, Flow Modulated, and Remote Node Modulated Pressure Management methods. Although applying pressure management generally brings economic benefits, knowing which of the four pressure management methods is the most economically advantageous to implement in a water distribution system is essential. Water distribution systems can exhibit different characteristics in terms of size, water consumption patterns, and leakage rates. The main objective of this study is to hydraulically model pressure management methods in water distribution systems with such different characteristics and to determine which of these methods is the most cost-effective.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available in a repository (https://github.com/MehmetMelihKosucu/EPANET_3-PMX) online in accordance with funder data retention policies.

Reproducible Results

Zoran Kapelan (Delft University of Technology) reviewed and reproduced the data.

Acknowledgments

The first author is supported by the National Center for High Performance Computing of Turkey (UHeM) (Grant No. 4009422021). The second author is supported by the Scientific Research Projects Department of Istanbul Technical University (ITU-BAP) (Grant No. MDA-2022-43762) and the National Center for High Performance Computing of Turkey (UHeM) (Grant No. 1007292019). The authors would like to thank the General Directorate of Istanbul Water and Sewerage Administration (İSKİ), and Ufuk Bal C.E., a staff member of the European Side Water Loss and Pressure Management Directorate of İSKİ, for sharing many of the data used in this study.
Author contributions: Mustafa Alper Özdemir, an undergraduate student at Istanbul Technical University Civil Engineering Department, compiled the source code, executed the software, and produced the output files. After all this, the authors validated the reproducibility of this study.

References

Abdelmeguid, H. 2011. “Pressure, leakage and energy management in water distribution systems.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Engineering, De Montfort Univ.
Akbarkhiavi, S. P., and M. A. Imteaz. 2021. “A novel ‘pressure index’ for predicting number of pipe bursts in water distribution system.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Water Manage. 174 (6): 278–290. https://doi.org/10.1680/jwama.20.00076.
Araujo, L. S., H. Ramos, and S. T. Coelho. 2006. “Pressure control for leakage minimisation in water distribution systems management.” Water Resour. Manage. 20 (Feb): 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-4635-3.
Awad, H., Z. Kapelan, and D. Savic. 2008. “Analysis of pressure management economics in water distribution systems.” In Proc., 10th Annual Water Distribution Systems Analysis Conf., edited by J. E. van Zyl, A. A. Ilemobade, and H. E. Jacobs. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Awad, H., Z. Kapelan, and D. A. Savić. 2009. “Optimal setting of time-modulated pressure reducing valves in water distribution networks using genetic algorithms.” In Proc., 10th Int. on Computing and Control for the Water Industry, Integrating Water Systems CCWI 2009, edited by J. Boxall and C. Maksimovic, 31–37. London: Taylor and Francis.
Aydogdu, M., and M. Firat. 2015. “Estimation of failure rate in water distribution network using fuzzy clustering and LS-SVM methods.” Water Resour. Manage. 29 (5): 1575–1590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0895-5.
Berardi, L., D. Laucelli, R. Ugarelli, and O. Giustolisi. 2015a. “Hydraulic system modelling: Background leakage model calibration in Oppegård municipality.” Procedia Eng. 119 (Jan): 633–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.916.
Berardi, L., D. Laucelli, R. Ugarelli, and O. Giustolisi. 2015b. “Leakage management: Planning remote real time controlled pressure reduction in Oppegård municipality.” Procedia Eng. 119 (Jan): 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.855.
Boztaş, F., Ö. Özdemir, F. M. Durmuşçelebi, and M. Firat. 2019. “Analyzing the effect of the unreported leakages in service connections of water distribution networks on non-revenue water.” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 16 (Aug): 4393–4406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-2085-0.
Campisano, A., E. Creaco, and C. Modica. 2010. “RTC of valves for leakage reduction in water supply networks.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 136 (Feb): 138–141. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2010)136:1(138).
Campisano, A., C. Modica, S. Reitano, R. Ugarelli, and S. Bagherian. 2016. “Field-oriented methodology for real-time pressure control to reduce leakage in water distribution networks.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 142 (12): 04016057. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000697.
Campisano, A., C. Modica, and L. Vetrano. 2012. “Calibration of proportional controllers for the RTC of pressures to reduce leakage in water distribution networks.” Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 138 (Aug): 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000197.
Creaco, E., A. Campisano, N. Fontana, G. Marini, P. R. Page, and T. Walski. 2019. “Real time control of water distribution networks: A state-of-the-art review.” Water Res. 161 (Sep): 517–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.06.025.
Creaco, E., A. Campisano, M. Franchini, and C. Modica. 2017. “Unsteady flow modeling of pressure real-time control in water distribution networks.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 143 (9): 04017056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000821.
Creaco, E., A. Campisano, and C. Modica. 2018. “Testing behavior and effects of PRVs and RTC valves during hydrant activation scenarios.” Urban Water J. 15(3): 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2018.1424214.
Creaco, E., and M. Franchini. 2013. “A new algorithm for real-time pressure control in water distribution networks.” Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply 13 (4): 875. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2013.074.
Creaco, E., and T. Walski. 2017. “Economic analysis of pressure control for leakage and pipe burst reduction.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 143 (12): 04017074. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000846.
Creaco, E., and T. Walski. 2018. “Operation and cost-effectiveness of local and remote RTC.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 144 (11): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000993.
deMonsabert, S., and B. L. Liner. 1998. “Integrated energy and water conservation modeling.” J. Energy Eng. 124 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9402(1998)124:1(1).
Fanner, P., and A. O. Lambert. 2009. “Calculating SRELL with pressure management, active leakage control and leak run-time options, with confidence limits.” In Proc., of 5th IWA Water Loss Reduction Specialist Conf., 373–380. London: International Water Association.
Fantozzi, M., I. Popescu, T. Farnham, F. Archetti, P. Mogre, E. Tsouchnika, C. Chiesa, A. Tsertou, M. Castro Gama, and M. Bimpas. 2014. “ICT for efficient water resources management: The ICeWater energy management and control approach.” Procedia Eng. 70 (Dec): 633–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.02.069.
Fontana, N., M. Giugni, L. Glielmo, G. Marini, and F. Verrilli. 2017a. “Real-time control of a PRV in water distribution networks for pressure regulation: Theoretical framework and laboratory experiments.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 144 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000855.
Fontana, N., M. Giugni, L. Glielmo, G. Marini, and R. Zollo. 2017b. “Real-time control of pressure for leakage reduction in water distribution network: Field experiments.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 144 (3): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000887.
Galuppini, G., L. Magni, and E. Creaco. 2020. “Stability and robustness of real-time pressure control in water distribution systems.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 146 (4): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001722.
García-Ávila, F., A. Avilés-Añazco, J. Ordoñez-Jara, C. Guanuchi-Quezada, L. Flores del Pino, and L. Ramos-Fernández. 2019. “Pressure management for leakage reduction using pressure reducing valves. Case study in an Andean city.” Alexandria Eng. J. 58 (4): 1313–1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.11.003.
Gonelas, K., and V. Kanakoudis. 2015. “The economic impact of pressure management in Kozani city’s water distribution system. Benefits, expenditures and revenue losses.” In Proc., IWA Balkan Young Water Professionals, 182–190. London: International Water Association.
Hamilton, S., and R. Mckenzie. 2014. Water management and water loss. London: IWA Publishing.
Janus, T., and B. Ulanicki. 2017. “Hydraulic modelling for pressure reducing valve controller design addressing disturbance rejection and stability properties.” Procedia Eng. 186 (Jan): 635–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.280.
Janus, T., and B. Ulanicki. 2018. “Improving stability of electronically controlled pressure-reducing valves through gain compensation.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 144 (8): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001498.
Karadirek, I. E., S. Kara, G. Yilmaz, A. Muhammetoglu, and H. Muhammetoglu. 2012. “Implementation of hydraulic modelling for water-loss reduction through pressure management.” Water Resour. Manage. 26 (9): 2555–2568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0032-2.
Koşucu, M. M. 2021. EPANET RWC GGA extension. Geneva: Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5105780.
Koşucu, M. M. 2022. EPANET 3-Pressure management extension. Geneva: Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7479388.
Koşucu, M. M., E. Albay, and M. C. Demirel. 2022. “Extending EPANET hydraulic solver capacity with rigid water column global gradient algorithm.” J. Hydro-environ. Res. 42 (May): 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2022.04.002.
Koşucu, M. M., and M. C. Demirel. 2022. “Smart pressure management extension for EPANET: Source code enhancement with a dynamic pressure reducing valve model.” J. Hydroinf. 24 (3): 642–658. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2022.172.
Kunkel, G., and R. Sturm. 2011. “Piloting proactive, advanced leakage management technologies.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 103 (2): 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.2011.tb11402.x.
Lalonde, A. M. 2005. “Use of flow modulated pressure management in York Region, Ontario, Canada.” In Proc., IWA Int. Specialized Conf. Leakage 2005, 176–184. London: IWA Publishing.
Lambert, A., M. Fantozzi, and M. Shepherd. 2017. “Pressure: Leak flow rates using FAVAD: An improved fast-track practitioner’s approach.” In Proc., 15th Int. Conf. on Computing and Control for the Water Industry–CCWI 2017. Sheffield, UK: Univ. of Sheffield.
Lambert, A., M. Fantozzi, and J. Thornton. 2013. “Practical approaches to modeling leakage and pressure management in distribution systems-Progress since 2005.” In Proc., 12th Int. Conf. on Computing and Control for the Water Industry–CCWI 2013, 1–11. Huddersfield, UK: LEAKSSuite Library.
Lambert, A. O., T. G. Brown, M. Takizawa, and D. Weimer. 1999. “A review of performance indicators for real losses from water supply systems.” J. Water Supply Res. Technol. AQUA 48 (6): 227–237. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.1999.0025.
Marsili, V., R. Zarbo, S. Alvisi, and M. Franchini. 2020. “Laboratory analysis of a piston-actuated pressure-reducing valve under low flow conditions.” Water 12 (4): 940. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12040940.
Martínez-Codina, Á., L. Cueto-Felgueroso, M. Castillo, and L. Garrote. 2015. “Use of pressure management to reduce the probability of pipe breaks: A Bayesian approach.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 141 (9): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000519.
Marunga, A., Z. Hoko, and E. Kaseke. 2006. “Pressure management as a leakage reduction and water demand management tool: The case of the City of Mutare, Zimbabwe.” Phys. Chem. Earth 31 (15–16): 763–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2006.08.032.
Meyer, N., M. Engelbrecht, and D. Wright. 2009. “Large scale pressure management implementation in the city of Cape Town.” In Proc., Water Loss 2009 South Africa. London: IWA Publishing.
Moslehi, I., M. Jalili Ghazizadeh, and E. Yousefi-Khoshqalb. 2020. “An economic valuation model for alternative pressure management schemes in water distribution networks.” Utilities Policy 67 (Nov): 101129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2020.101129.
Nault, J. D., and B. W. Karney. 2016. “Improved rigid water column formulation for simulating slow transients and controlled operations.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 142 (9): 04016025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001145.
Nicolini, M., C. Giacomello, M. Scarsini, and M. Mion. 2014. “Numerical modeling and leakage reduction in the water distribution system of Udine.” Procedia Eng. 70 (1): 1241–1250 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.02.137.
Nicolini, M., and L. Zovatto. 2009. “Optimal location and control of pressure reducing valves in water.” Networks 135 (Jun): 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2009)135:3(178.
Parra, S., and S. Krause. 2017. “Pressure management by combining pressure reducing valves and pumps as turbines for water loss reduction and energy recovery.” Int. J. Sustainable Dev. Plann. 12 (1): 89–97. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V12-N1-89-97.
Paskalev, A., S. Ivanov, and M. Tanev. 2011. “Water loss reduction in Razgrad demonstrative project through active leakage control, pressure management and the relationship between pressure management and leakage: The case of Kooperative Pazar DMA.” Water Util. J. 2 (Jun): 3–21.
Piller, O., and J. E. van Zyl. 2014. “Modeling control valves in water distribution systems using a continuous state formulation.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 140 (11): 04014052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000920.
Prescott, S., and B. Ulanicki. 2008. “Improved control of pressure reducing valves in water distribution networks.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 134 (Jan): 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:1(56).
Prescott, S. L., and B. Ulanicki. 2003. “Dynamic modeling of pressure reducing valves.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 129 (10): 804–812. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2003)129:10(804).
Rokstad, M. M. 2021. “Optimisation of fixed-outlet and flow-modulated pressure reduction measures in looped water distribution networks constrained by fire-fighting capacity requirements.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18 (13): 7088. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137088.
Schwaller, J., and J. E. van Zyl. 2015. “Modeling the pressure-leakage response of water distribution systems based on individual leak behavior.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 141 (5): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000984.
Thornton, J., and A. O. Lambert. 2007. “Pressure management extends infrastructure life and reduces unnecessary energy costs.” In Proc., IWA Int. Specialised Conf.: Water Loss 2007, 1–10. London: IWA Publishing.
Thornton, J., R. Sturm, and G. Kunkel. 2008. Water loss control. New York: McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.1036/0071499180.
Ulanicki, B., H. AbdelMeguid, P. Bounds, and R. Patel. 2008. “Pressure control in district metering areas with boundary and internal pressure reducing valves.” In Proc., 10th Annual Water Distribution Systems Analysis Conf., 691–703. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/41024(340)58.
Ulanicki, B., and P. Beaujean. 2021. “Modeling dynamic behavior of water distribution systems for control purposes.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 147 (8): 04021043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001403.
Ulanicki, B., P. L. M. Bounds, J. P. Rance, and L. Reynolds. 2000. “Open and closed loop pressure control for leakage reduction.” Urban Water 2 (2): 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-0758(00)00048-0.
Ulanicki, B., and P. Skworcow. 2014. “Why PRVs tends to oscillate at low flows.” Procedia Eng. 89 (Jan): 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.202.
van Zyl, J. E., and A. M. Cassa. 2014. “Modeling elastically deforming leaks in water distribution pipes.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 140 (2): 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000813.
Vicente, D. J., L. Garrote, R. Sánchez, and D. Santillán. 2016. “Pressure management in water distribution systems: Current status, proposals, and future trends.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 142 (2): 04015061. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000589.
Yilmaz, S., M. Firat, A. Ateş, and Ö. Özdemir. 2021. “Analysis of economic leakage level and infrastructure leakage index indicator by applying active leakage control.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 12 (4): 04021046. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000583.
Zarbo, R., V. Marsili, S. Alvisi, and M. Franchini. 2019. “Laboratory analysis of a piston-actuated pressure reducing valve under low flow conditions.” In Vol. 48 of Proc., 4th Int. Electronic Conf. on Water Sciences, 26. Basel, Switzerland: MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECWS-4-06444.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 150Issue 3March 2024

History

Received: Sep 14, 2022
Accepted: Sep 29, 2023
Published online: Dec 20, 2023
Published in print: Mar 1, 2024
Discussion open until: May 20, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Mehmet Melih Koşucu, Ph.D., M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5907-6964 [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Hydraulics Laboratory, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Hydraulics Division, Istanbul Technical Univ., ITU Maslak Campus, Sarıyer, Istanbul 34469, Turkey; Hydraulics and Marine Sciences Research Center, Istanbul Technical Univ., Maslak, Istanbul 34485, Turkey (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5907-6964. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Hydraulics Laboratory, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Hydraulics Division, Istanbul Technical Univ., ITU Maslak Campus, Sarıyer, Istanbul 34469, Turkey; Associate Professor, Hydraulics and Marine Sciences Research Center, Istanbul Technical Univ., Maslak, Istanbul 34485, Turkey. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4402-906X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share