Evaluation of Community Regeneration Planning and Resilience Based on Fuzzy Group Decision-Making Method
Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 150, Issue 3
Abstract
In today's increasingly complex stock era, resilient community planning for uncertainty risks is important for building resilient cities and communities and for realizing the refinement, process, and systematization of planning. Therefore, this paper proposes the concept of community planning resilience based on resilience theory and explores a framework system for evaluating the planning resilience of renewal and transformation community by taking renewal and transformation future community planning of Zhejiang as the research object. At the same time, the technical path of realizing public participation in community planning is explored through the method, mechanism, and technical platform of fuzzy group decision-making. Finally, the feasibility of the aforementioned framework and approach is experimentally explored and verified based on a typical case of renewal and renovation of future community planning. In order to make community regeneration planning more planning resilient, this paper develops a community planning group decision-making study from the perspective of community planning resilience, which provides a new research perspective for the field of community resilience and provides a reference for community planning evaluation and the construction of resilient communities.
Practical Applications
In China's advancing urbanization, major cities are grappling with diverse risks, necessitating urban planning and governance with heightened resilience to face unforeseen black swan events and foreseeable gray rhinoceros challenges. This urgency is particularly pronounced in community renewal, prompting a vital shift from rigid to resilient planning methodologies. To address this shift, this paper advocates for resilient community construction to be a focal point in both policy and practical implementation of community regeneration. A novel approach utilizing the fuzzy decision-making method is proposed to establish a comprehensive resilient community renewal decision-making technology support system. This system employs a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, integrating an empowerment approach to simplify the complexities of a multicriteria index system. By mitigating the risks inherent in resilience planning, our approach enhances the scientific foundation and feasibility of decision-making in community renewal. A case study on the Future Community in Zhejiang Province validates the effectiveness of our approach, providing practical insights for constructing resilient community renewal models and system technology platforms. This research contributes to the ongoing exploration of strategies and technologies capable of addressing diverse challenges in urban development, providing references in enhancing urban resilience.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the National Social Science Foundation Project of China (21BSH138) and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LY24E080007).
References
Chen, Q., J. Hong, and H. Xu. 2022. “Detection effectiveness assessment of early warning satellites based on combined empowerment method and vague set theory.” J. Detect. Control 44 (4): 104–110.
Diakoulaki, D., G. Mavrotas, and L. Papayannakis. 1995. “Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method.” Comput. Oper. Res. 22 (7): 763–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H.
Du, M. 2021. A preliminary study on the path and strategy of integrating resilience planning into territorial spatial planning system—Based on international multi-scale resilience planning practice experience, 248–257. Chengdu: China Society of Urban Planning, Chengdu Municipal People's Government (Ed.).
Fan, Z., Q. Zhang, and J. Ma. 1998. “An integrated approach to weight determination in multi-attribute decision making.” J. Manage. Sci. 3: 52–55.
Guo, S. 2017. “Research on the effectiveness of planning environmental impact assessment based on AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Environmental Science, Henan Normal Univ.
Guo, Y., Z. Shang, J. Zou, et al. 2016. “A review of research on key issues in group decision making.” Stat. Decis. Making 24: 63–67.
Han, L., Q. Mei, Y. Lu, et al. 2004. “Analysis and research on AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method.” Chin. J. Saf. Sci. 7: 89–92. +3.
Jabareen, Y. 2013. “Planning the resilient city: Concepts and strategies for coping with climate change and environmental risk.” Cities 31 (1): 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004.
Lin, T. 2008. “The research on building enterprise knowledge management performance evaluating indicator system.” In Proc., Simulation and Optimization 2008 Int. Workshop on Modelling, 25–29. Hong Kong, China: IEEE.
Lu, Y., and G. Zhai. 2022. “Research progress and perspectives on the theory and practice of urban spatial resilience.” Shanghai Urban Plann. 6: 1–7.
MacKee, J. 2009. Conserving cultural built heritage in south and Southeast Asia: A conceptual framework for the conservation of non-secular built heritage based on the philosophical and cultural experiences of the region. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.
McAllister, T. 2015. Community resilience planning guide for buildings and infrastructure systems: Volume I: NIST SP 1190v1. Community Resilience Group. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Miao, Z., W. Zhuang, and B. Ruud, et al. 2015. “Group decision making under fuzzy preference relations in architectural planning.” Settlements 2015 (4): 6. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-9073.2015.04.021.
Qiu, B. 2018. “Resilient city design methods and principles based on complex adaptive system theory.” Urban Dev. Res. 25 (10): 1–3.
Rapaport, C., T. Hornik-Lurie, O. Cohen, et al. 2018. “The relationship between community type and community resilience.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 31: 470–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.020.
Shao, Y., and J. Xu. 2017. “Realizing resilience construction in urban planning: Implications of Japan's toughened planning for China.” City Disaster Reduct. 4: 71–76.
Sharifi, A. 2016. “A critical review of selected tools for assessing community resilience.” Ecol. Indic. 69: 629–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023.
Sharifi, A. 2019. “Resilient urban forms: A macro-scale analysis.” Cities 85: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.023.
Shen, J., and Y. Wang. 2017. “An urban community planning and design framework based on resilience characteristics.” Landscape Archit. 3: 98–106.
Shen, Y. 2019. Construction of resilience planning support system based on fuzzy multi-criteria analysis, 407–415. Chongqing: China Society of Urban Planning.
Tu, H. 2016. “Research on the decision-making body of architectural planning group decision-making for large-scale complex projects.” J. Archit. 55 (12): 72–76.
Wang, H., H. Shi, and Y. Qi. 2022. “Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of urban health and comfort checkup based on combination assignment.” Hebei Ind. Sci. Technol. 39 (6): 449–455.
Wang, W. M. 2013. “An integrated decision making model for district revitalization and regeneration project selection.” Decis. Support Syst. 54 (2): 1092–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.035.
Yan, W., J. Ren, S. Zhang, et al. 2022. “Resilient urban planning in Shanghai: Key issues, general framework and planning strategies.” J. Urban Plann. 3: 19–28. https://doi.org/10.35965/jups.v3i1.291.
Yu, L., and K. Zheng. 2021. “Comparison of the weights of different objective assignment methods in journal evaluation and its reflection.” Mod. Intell. 41 (12): 121–130.
Zeng, C. 2011. “Building evaluation indicator system for competitiveness of private enterprise.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Computer Science and Service System. Nanjing, China: IEEE.
Zeng, X., Y. Chen, S. Le, et al. 2022. “Quantitative identification of quality markers of dictyostelium officinale based on AHP-CRITIC comprehensive empowerment method.” Chin. J. Tradit. Chin. Med. 47 (19): 5193–5202.
Zhang, B. J. 2014. Hierarchical analysis and its application cases. Beijing: Electronic Industry Press.
Zhang, F. J. 2022. Comprehensive evaluation of basic methods and applications. Beijing: Science Press.
Zhang, R., and J. Yuan. 2008. “Continuous scaling of AHP method and its application in transportation research.” Highway Motor Transp. 2008 (2): 49–51.
Zhang, Y., and H. B. Wei. 2012. “A multi-attribute decision combination assignment method based on CRITIC.” Stat. Decis. Making 2012 (16): 75–77.
Zhong, X. 2021. “Resilient community planning practices in New York and some discussions.” Int. Urban Plann. 36 (6): 32–39.
Zhuang, W., and Z. Miao. 2015. “Research on multidisciplinary integration of contemporary architectural planning methods—Introduction of fuzzy decision theory.” J. Archit. 56 (03): 14–18.
Zou, Z., and C. Peng. 2015. “Research on the construction of spatial planning model of ‘elastic new city’ and its application.” Cent. China Archit. 33 (9): 79–83.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 150 • Issue 3 • September 2024
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 23, 2023
Accepted: Mar 25, 2024
Published online: Jun 4, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Nov 4, 2024
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.