Technical Papers
Sep 15, 2023

Analyzing the Urban Form in Suburban Areas of the South Bengal Region Using Built Fractals

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 149, Issue 4

Abstract

A dynamic combination of environmental, social, and economic factors shapes and manages the urban landscape. Understanding these factors behind urban growth can help us discern more about its past and future. This study examines the fractal dimension of the built-up area (BUA) boundaries of two municipalities in the emerging South Bengal Region (SBR) urban areas that have developed gradually over the last three decades. Fractalyse software (version 3.0-0.9.1) was used to estimate the fractal dimension using the box-counting method and generalized nonlinear and logarithmic models to link the changing socioeconomic patterns of the study areas over time. The fractal dimension measurement increased significantly between 1991 and 2021, with the overall global structure growing similarly to large metropolises in developed economies in the 20th century. In particular, the models have offered a framework for examining the link between urban form and socioeconomic structure to construct the concept of spatial replacement dynamics in urban landscapes. The results of this study have the potential to aid cities in gaining a deeper understanding of the possibilities and threats they will face in the future and in formulating efficient plans to improve their adaptation and resilience. The findings of this study also imply that urban fringes are conducive to denser expansion and prosperous economic growth. The fractal dimension values decrease as the distance from Kolkata, the core city, increases, while upscaled industrial zones create inhospitable landscapes along the Hooghly River. Therefore, this study suggests several recommendations for sustainable growth and development corresponding to the rapid urbanization of eco-sensitive zones in developing economies. According to this study, the SBR's population is anticipated to expand, suggesting that economic forces would contribute to the region's urbanization, tending toward built environment saturation. While population growth and development are desirable, they may pose social, economic, and environmental challenges in the studied regions if they occur at an insufficient pace.

Practical Applications

Sustainable development and conservation efforts in places of high environmental significance need the findings of this research to be used in contexts comparable to those in South Bengal, India. Applications in Urban Form and Development: Sustainability Planning may benefit from urban form studies because they reveal information about the spatial organization of urban areas in eco-sensitive zones, which is helpful for both ecological planning and the identification of ecologically sensitive areas needing protection and conservation. In the same vein, urban form studies assist in the planning and designing of infrastructure projects, which in turn may help facilitate sustainable infrastructure development by improving our knowledge of natural topography and the reallocation of space in response to an expanding built environment. This safeguards the area's ecology, biodiversity, and ecological equilibrium by ensuring that development interventions have minimal adverse effects. Practical applications of socioeconomic studies knowing how a population's socioeconomic features stack up helps improve livelihoods and increase community involvement in decision-making. Incorporating local knowledge makes it possible to better tailor development projects to the wants, requirements, and cultural norms of the people living in environmentally vulnerable areas. Policymakers may use it, and the general public benefits from more conservation and heightened understanding. Protecting the environment, promoting sustainable livelihoods, engaging people, formulating effective policies, and raising awareness of the need for conservation are all achievable via the application of urban form and socioeconomic research in eco-sensitive zones of South Bengal. These applications aid in the maintenance of biodiversity, the improvement of local quality of life, and the promotion of long-term economic growth in the area.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Prime Minister Research Fellowship (PMRF) program by the Ministry of Human Resource & Development (MHRD), India for instructive support and financial assistance during the manuscript preparation. The authors also thank the reviewers for their valuable inputs to improve the manuscript and the creators of the software Fractalyse utilized for fractal analysis. The Ministry of Education India provided funding through the Prime Minister Research Fellowship Program (Ministry of Human Resource Development India) for this research and data collection.

References

Abid, R. I., and A. Tortum. 2021. “The fractal geometry of Turkey's urban transportation networks.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 25 (4): 1455–1466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-1538-z.
Aboshosha, H., G. Bitsuamlak, and A. El Damatty. 2015. “LES of ABL flow in the built-environment using roughness modeled by fractal surfaces.” Sustain. Cities Soc. 19: 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.07.003.
Abrantes, P., J. Rocha, E. Marques da Costa, E. Gomes, P. Morgado, and N. Costa. 2017. “Modelling urban form: A multidimensional typology of urban occupation for spatial analysis.” Environ. Plann. B: Urban Anal. City Sci. 46 (1): 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317700140.
Alam, T. 2021. “Futuristic urbanism of eco-sensitive zone of India: A case study of Kolkata region.” In Sustainable climate action and water management, edited by R. K. Mishra, R. B. Singh, and A. Dubey, 303–309. Singapore: Springer.
Alam, T., and A. Banerjee. 2022a. “Characterizing land transformation and densification using urban sprawl metrics in the South Bengal region of India.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 89: 104295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104295.
Alam, T., and A. Banerjee. 2022b. “Deciphering urbanization and spatial disparity in south 24 Parganas district of West Bengal, India.” In Proc., 58th ISOCARP World Planning Congress. Brussels, Belgium: ISOCARP.
Alam, T., and A. Banerjee. 2023. “Morphing demographic characteristics driven by altering water use in South Bengal.” In Vol. 1 of Book of Abstracts, Annual Research on Cities Summit 7.0. Orissa, India: School of Human Settlements, XIM Univ.
Albert, C., B. Schröter, D. Haase, M. Brillinger, J. Henze, S. Herrmann, S. Gottwald, P. Guerrero, C. Nicolas, B. Matzdorf, and B. Matzdorf. 2019. “Addressing societal challenges through nature-based solutions: How can landscape planning and governance research contribute?” Landsc. Urban Plan. 182: 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.10.003.
Alexander, C. 1964. Vol. 5 of Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anderson, J. E., G. Wulfhorst, and W. Lang. 2015. “Energy analysis of the built environment—A review and outlook.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 44: 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.027.
Angel, S. 2012. Planet of cities. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Antipova, A., F. Wang, and C. Wilmot. 2011. “Urban land uses, socioeconomic attributes and commuting: A multilevel modeling approach.” Appl. Geogr. 31 (3): 1010–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.02.001.
Bandyopadhyay, M., and R. Basu. 2017. “Crisis of fresh water in south 24 Parganas district, West Bengal: Causes and consequences.” IOSR J. Humanit. Social Sci. 22 (6): 4–15. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2206040415.
Batty, M. 2008. “The size, scale, and shape of cities.” Science 319 (5864): 769–771. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151419.
Batty, M. 2012. “Building a science of cities.” Cities 29: S9–S16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.008.
Batty, M., and P. A. Longley. 1988. “The morphology of urban land use.” Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 15 (4): 461–488. https://doi.org/10.1068/b150461.
Besussi, E., N. Chin, M. Batty, and P. Longley. 2010. “The structure and form of urban settlements.” In Remote Sensing of Urban and Suburban Areas, edited by F. D. van der Meer, 13–31. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Bettencourt, L. M. 2013. “The origins of scaling in cities.” Science 340 (6139): 1438–1441. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1235823.
Bhagwat, J. M., and V. Devadas. 2020. “Planning for a sustainable compact city: A way forward.” WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 241: 113–122. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP200101.
Boeing, G. 2018. “Measuring the complexity of urban form and design.” Urban Des. Int. 23 (4): 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-018-0072-1.
Bonin, O. 2021. “Thom's catastrophe theory and Turing's morphogenesis for urban growth modelling.” In Handbook on Entropy, Complexity and Spatial Dynamics, edited by A. Reggiani, C. Danny, L. A. Schintler, and R. Patuelli. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Bosch, M., R. Jaligot, and J. Chenal. 2020. “Spatiotemporal patterns of urbanization in three Swiss urban agglomerations: Insights from landscape metrics, growth modes and fractal analysis.” Landscape Ecol. 35 (4): 879–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-00985-y.
Budge Budge Municipality. 2022. Information about Budge Budge municipality. Accessed November 8, 2022. https://budgebudgemunicipality.org/.
Cai, M., Y. Shi, C. Ren, T. Yoshida, Y. Yamagata, C. Ding, and N. Zhou. 2021. “The need for urban form data in spatial modeling of urban carbon emissions in China: A critical review.” J. Cleaner Prod. 319: 128792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128792.
Census of India. 2011. Population enumeration data (final population). India: Government of India.
Champion, I., and Gyot. 1991. “Generalized formulation for semi-empirical radar models.” In Proc. of the 5th Int. Colloquium on the Spectral Signatures in Remote Sensing, 14–18. France: AgroParisTech.
Chakraborty, S., I. Maity, P. P. Patel, H. Dadashpoor, S. Pramanik, A. Follmann, J. Novotný, and U. Roy. 2021. “Spatio-temporal patterns of urbanization in the Kolkata Urban Agglomeration: A dynamic spatial territory-based approach.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 67: 102715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102715.
Chen, Y. 2018. “Logistic models of fractal dimension growth of urban morphology.” Fractals 26 (3): 1850033. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218348(18500330.
Chen, T. L., H. W. Chiu, and Y. F. Lin. 2020. “How do east and southeast Asian cities differ from western cities? A systematic review of the urban form characteristics.” Sustainability 12 (6): 2423. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062423.
Crooks, A., D. Pfoser, A. Jenkins, A. Croitoru, A. Stefanidis, D. Smith, S. Karagiorgou, A. Efentakis, and G. Lamprianidis. 2015. “Crowdsourcing urban form and function.” Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 29 (5): 720–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2014.977905.
Crowley, T., and D. A. Ghertner. 2022. “Itinerant urbanization: On circles, fractals and the critique of segmented space.” Environ. Plann. D: Soc. Space 40 (4): 646–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758221108405.
Dempsey, N., C. Brown, S. Raman, S. Porta, M. Jenks, C. Jones, and G. Bramley. 2010. “Elements of urban form.” Dimensions Sustain. City 21–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8647-2_2.
Dempsey, N., C. Brown, and G. Bramley. 2012. “The key to sustainable urban development in UK cities? The influence of density on social sustainability.” Progress Plann. 77 (3): 89–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2012.01.001.
Diamond Harbour Municipality. 2022. “History of DHM.” Accessed November 8, 2022. https://www.diamondharbourmunicipality.org/diamondharbourmunicipality.org/index.html.
Dieleman, F., and M. Wegener. 2004. “Compact city and urban sprawl.” Built Environ. 30 (4): 308–323. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.30.4.308.57151.
Falconer, D. S. 1990. “Selection in different environments: effects on environmental sensitivity (reaction norm) and on mean performance.” Genet. Res. 56 (1): 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672300028883.
Fan, G., X. Xie, J. Chen, Z. Wan, M. Yu, and J. Shi. 2022. “Has China's free trade zone policy expedited port production and development?” Mar. Policy 137: 104951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104951.
Frenkel, A., and D. E. Orenstein. 2012. “Can urban growth management work in an era of political and economic change?” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 78 (1): 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2011.643533.
Gao, K., Z. Qi, Y. Liu, and J. Zhang. 2022. “Calculation model for ventilation friction resistance coefficient by surrounding rock roughness distribution characteristics of mine tunnel.” Sci. Rep. 12 (1): 3193. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07115-5.
Giuliano, G., S. Kang, and Q. Yuan. 2019. “Agglomeration economies and evolving urban form.” Ann. Reg. Sci. 63 (3): 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-019-00957-4.
Guo, S., T. Pei, S. Xie, C. Song, J. Chen, Y. Liu, H. Shu, X. Wang, and L. Yin. 2021. “Fractal dimension of job-housing flows: A comparison between Beijing and Shenzhen.” Cities 112: 103120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103120.
Guyot, M., A. Araldi, G. Fusco, and I. Thomas. 2021. “The urban form of Brussels from the street perspective: The role of vegetation in the definition of the urban fabric.” Landscape Urban Plann. 205: 103947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103947.
Hamin, E. M., and N. Gurran. 2009. “Urban form and climate change: Balancing adaptation and mitigation in the US and Australia.” Habitat Inter. 33 (3): 238–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.005.
Henderson, J. V. 2000. The effects of urban concentration on economic growth. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Holden, E., and I. T. Norland. 2005. “Three challenges for the compact city as a sustainable urban form: Household consumption of energy and transport in eight residential areas in the greater Oslo region.” Urban Stud. 42 (12): 2145–2166. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500332064.
Huang, J., Y. Cui, H. Chang, H. Obracht-Prondzyńska, D. Kamrowska-Zaluska, and L. Li. 2022. “A city is not a tree: A multi-city study on street network and urban life.” Landscape Urban Plann. 226: 104469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104469.
Jacobs, J. 2010. Dark age ahead: Author of the death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage.
Jahanmiri, F., and D. C. Parker. 2022. “An overview of fractal geometry applied to urban planning.” Land 11 (4): 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11040475.
Jevric, M., and M. Romanovich. 2016. “Fractal dimensions of urban border as a criterion for space management.” Procedia Eng. 165: 1478–1482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.882.
Kaye Nijaki, L., and G. Worrel. 2012. “Procurement for sustainable local economic development.” Int. J. Pub. Sec. Manag. 25 (2): 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551211223785.
Keuschnigg, M., S. Mutgan, and P. Hedström. 2019. “Urban scaling and the regional divide.” Sci. Adv. 5 (1): eaav0042. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav0042.
Kolyukhin, D. 2021. “Study the accuracy of the correlation fractal dimension estimation.” Commun. Stat. - Simul. Comput. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2021.2014888.
Krüger, E. L., and T. Costa. 2019. “Interferences of urban form on human thermal perception.” Sci. Total Environ. 653: 1067–1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.027.
Lam, N. 1990. “Description and measurement of Landsat TM images using fractals.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 56 (2): 187–195.
Lagarias, A., and P. Prastacos. 2018. “Comparing the urban form of south European cities using fractal dimensions.” Environ. Plann. B: Urban Anal. City Sci. 47 (7): 1149–1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808318820911.
Lalović, K., J. Živković, U. Radosavljević, and Z. Đukanović. 2019. “An integral approach to the modeling of information support for local sustainable development—Experiences of a Serbian enabling leadership experiment.” Sustainability 11 (9): 2675. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092675.
Lan, T., and P. A. Longley. 2021. “Urban morphology and residential differentiation across Great Britain, 1881–1901.” Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 111 (6): 1796–1815. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1859982.
Lang, R., and P. K. Knox. 2009. “The new metropolis: Rethinking megalopolis.” Reg. Stud. 43 (6): 789–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701654251.
Li, Z., and D. Hu. 2022. “Exploring the relationship between the 2D/3D architectural morphology and urban land surface temperature based on a boosted regression tree: A case study of Beijing, China.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 78: 103392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103392.
Li, Z., H. Wu, and F. Wu. 2022. “Impacts of urban forms and socioeconomic factors on CO2 emissions: A spatial econometric analysis.” J. Cleaner Prod. 372: 133722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133722.
Liang, W., and M. Yang. 2019. “Urbanization, economic growth and environmental pollution: Evidence from China.” Sustainable Comput: Inf. Syst. 21: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2018.11.007.
Liu, S., and Y. Chen. 2022. “A three-dimensional box-counting method to study the fractal characteristics of urban areas in Shenyang, Northeast China.” Buildings 12 (3): 299. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12030299.
Lohrey, S., and F. Creutzig. 2016. “A ‘sustainability window’ of urban form.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 45: 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.09.004.
Man, X., and Y. Chen. 2020. “Fractal-based modeling and spatial analysis of urban form and growth: A case study of Shenzhen in China.” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 9 (11): 672. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9110672.
Mandelbrot, B. 1967. “How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension.” Science 156 (3775): 636–638. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.156.3775.636.
Mouratidis, K. 2019. “Compact city, urban sprawl, and subjective well-being.” Cities 92: 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.013.
Næss, P. 2014. “Urban form, sustainability and health: The case of greater Oslo.” Eur. Plan. Stud. 22 (7): 1524–1543.
Oshrieh, R., and E. Valipour. 2019. “The role of urban density and morphology in the air pollution of Tehran metropolitan.” J. Contemp. Urban Aff. 3 (1): 38–43. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2018.4680.
Pandit, A., et al. 2017. “Infrastructure ecology: An evolving paradigm for sustainable urban development.” J. Cleaner Prod. 163: S19–S27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.010.
Pili, S., E. Grigoriadis, M. Carlucci, M. Clemente, and L. Salvati. 2017. “Towards sustainable growth? A multi-criteria assessment of (changing) urban forms.” Ecol. Indic. 76: 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.01.008.
Purevtseren, M., B. Tsegmid, M. Indra, and M. Sugar. 2018. “The fractal geometry of urban land use: The case of Ulaanbaatar city, Mongolia.” Land 7 (2): 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7020067.
Rao, Y., J. Yang, D. Dai, K. Wu, and Q. He. 2021. “Urban growth pattern and commuting efficiency: Empirical evidence from 100 Chinese cities.” J. Cleaner Prod. 302: 126994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126994.
Sharifi, A. 2019. “Urban form resilience: A meso-scale analysis.” Cities 93: 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.010.
Sharma, S. N. 2014. “Urban forms in planning and design.” Int. J. Res. 1 (1): 7–16.
Silva, M., V. Oliveira, and V. Leal. 2017. “Urban form and energy demand.” J. Plann. Lit. 32 (4): 346–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412217706900.
Su, H., G. Han, L. Li, and H. Qin. 2021. “The impact of macro-scale urban form on land surface temperature: An empirical study based on climate zone, urban size and industrial structure in China.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 74: 103217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103217.
Sundarbans. 1987. Official designation as a UNESCO World Heritage Site. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. https://whc.unesco.org/.
Tonkiss, F. 2013. “Austerity urbanism and the makeshift city.” City 17 (3): 312–324.
Varkey, A. M., and S. Manasi. 2019. “A review of suburban definitions, land use changes and challenges to development.” Urban India 39 (1): 96–111.
Vaughan, J., and M. J. Ostwald. 2022. “Examining the position of Wright's Fallingwater in the context of his larger body of work: An analysis using fractal dimensions.” Fractal Fract. 6 (4): 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6040187.
Wang, Q., and F. Zhang. 2020. “Does increasing investment in research and development promote economic growth decoupling from carbon emission growth? An empirical analysis of BRICS countries.” J. Cleaner Prod. 252: 119853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119853.
Weng, X., Y. Liu, J. Ma, W. Wang, G. Yang, and B. Caballero. 2007. “An urban–rural comparison of the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in Eastern China.” Public Health Nutr. 10 (2): 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980007226023.
Williams, K. 2014. Urban form and infrastructure: A morphological review. Working paper. London: Future of Cities.
Williams, P. C., A. Binet, D. M. Alhasan, N. M. Riley, and C. L. Jackson. 2023. “Urban planning for health equity must employ an intersectionality framework.” J. Am. Med. Assoc. 89 (2): 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2022.2079550.
Xing, H., and Y. Meng. 2018. “Integrating landscape metrics and socioeconomic features for urban functional region classification.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 72: 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.06.005.
Xu, G., T. Dong, P. B. Cobbinah, L. Jiao, N. S. Sumari, B. Chai, and Y. Liu. 2019. “Urban expansion and form changes across African cities with a global outlook: Spatiotemporal analysis of urban land densities.” J. Cleaner Prod. 224: 802–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.276.
Yin, C., M. Yuan, Y. Lu, Y. Huang, and Y. Liu. 2018. “Effects of urban form on the urban heat island effect based on spatial regression model.” Sci Total Environ. 634: 696–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.350.
Zhang, A., C. Xia, and W. Li. 2022. “Exploring the effects of 3D urban form on urban air quality: Evidence from fifteen megacities in China.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 78: 103649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103649.
Živković, J. 2020. “Urban form and function.” In Climate Action, edited by W. Leal Filho, U. Azeiteiro, A. Azul, L. Brandli, P. Özuyar, and T. Wall, 862–871. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 149Issue 4December 2023

History

Received: Feb 9, 2023
Accepted: Jul 10, 2023
Published online: Sep 15, 2023
Published in print: Dec 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Feb 15, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Research Scholar, RCG School of Infrastructure Design and Management, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721302, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6076-0947. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Assistant Professor, RCG School of Infrastructure Design and Management, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721302, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1265-248X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share