Technical Papers
Dec 27, 2023

Promoting Public Participation in NIMBY Facilities' EIA in Urban Planning: An Evolutionary Game Model

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 150, Issue 1

Abstract

As a way of empowerment, public participation has gained extensive application to address not-in-my-backyard (NIMBY) issues in short-term one-off and long-term strategic urban planning. Promoting public participation in environmental impact assessment (EIA) is central to high-quality urban planning initiatives. However, few studies focus on the dynamics between local governments and the public and how they interact in the context of EIA. This study established an evolutionary game system based on bounded rationality theory, detected two players' (i.e., local governments and the public) behavioral strategies, and explored the effects of initial conditions and parameters on the game system's evolution. The results show that (1) local governments are dominant in motivating public participation in NIMBY's EIA, subject to the trade-off between costs and benefits; (2) public pressure on local governments has been a critical factor driving the system to evolve; (3) understanding the public's needs and developing mutual trust between these two players are prerequisites for promoting public participation; and (4) it is reasonable for local governments to give the public incentives that are slightly lower than the cost of public participation. The study sheds some light on urban planning systems by improving public participation in NIMBY's EIA to facilitate greener urban planning and development.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2022CDJSKPT25).

References

Brabham, D. C. 2012. “Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application to improve public engagement in transit planning.” J. Appl. Commun. Res. 40 (3): 307–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2012.693940.
Chen, M., X. Qian, and L. Zhang. 2015. “Public participation in environmental management in China: Status quo and mode innovation.” Environ. Manage. 55 (3): 523–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0428-2.
Dai, L., Q. Han, B. de Vries, and Y. Wang. 2022. “Exploring key determinants of willingness to participate in EIA decision-making on urban infrastructure projects.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 76: 103400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103400.
Doelle, M., and A. J. Sinclair. 2006. “Time for a new approach to public participation in EA: Promoting cooperation and consensus for sustainability.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 26 (2): 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2005.07.013.
Enserink, B., and M. Alberton. 2016. “Public participation in China: Strengths, weaknesses, and lessons learned.” J. Environ. Assess. Policy Manage. 18 (1): 1650005. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333216500058.
Fischer, F. 1993. “Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical cases.” Policy Sci. 26 (3): 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999715.
Fredriksson, P. G. 2000. “The siting of hazardous waste facilities in federal systems: The political economy of NIMBY.” Environ. Resour. Econ. 15 (1): 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008313612369.
Friedman, D. 1991. “Evolutionary game in economics.” Econometrica 59 (3): 637–666. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938222.
Guo, Y., P. Ru, J. Su, and L. D. Anadon. 2015. “Not in my backyard, but not far away from me: Local acceptance of wind power in China.” Energy 82: 722–733.
Henningsson, M., M. Blicharska, H. Antonson, G. Mikusiński, G. Göransson, P. Angelstam, L. Folkeson, and S. Jönsson. 2015. “Perceived landscape values and public participation in a road-planning process—A case study in Sweden.” J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 58 (4): 631–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2013.876391.
Hou, G., and Y. Wang. 2014. “Why NIMBY crisis evolutes—an integrated attribution model.” [In Chinese.] J. Public Manage. 11 (3): 80–92.
Ibitayo, O. O., and K. D. Pijawka. 1999. “Reversing NIMBY: An assessment of state strategies for siting hazardous-waste facilities.” Environ. Plann. C: Gov. Policy 17 (4): 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1068/c170379.
Johnson, T. 2020. “Public participation in China's EIA process and the regulation of environmental disputes.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 81: 106359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106359.
Kahila-Tani, M., A. Broberg, M. Kytt, and T. Tyger. 2016. “Let the citizens map—public participation GIS as a planning support system in the Helsinki master plan process.” Plann. Pract. Res. 31 (2): 195–214.
Kikuchi, R., and R. Gerardo. 2009. “More than a decade of conflict between hazardous waste management and public resistance: A case study of NIMBY syndrome in Souselas (Portugal).” J. Hazard. Mater. 172 (2–3): 1681–1685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.062.
Knudsen, J. K., L. C. Wold, Ø. Aas, J. J. K. Haug, S. Batel, P. Devine-Wright, M. Qvenild, and G. B. Jacobsen. 2015. “Local perceptions of opportunities for engagement and procedural justice in electricity transmission grid projects in Norway and the UK.” Land Use Policy 48: 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.04.031.
Lake, R. W. 1993. “Planners’ alchemy transforming NIMBY to YIMBY: Rethinking NIMBY.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 59 (1): 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369308975847.
Lang, G., and Y. Xu. 2013. “Anti-incinerator campaigns and the evolution of protest politics in China.” Environ. Polit. 22 (5): 832–848. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.765684.
Leao, S., and P. Izadpahani. 2016. “Factors motivating citizen engagement in mobile sensing: Insights from a survey of non-participants.” J. Urban Technol. 23 (4): 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2016.1175824.
Li, T. H., S. T. Ng, and M. Skitmore. 2012a. “Public participation in infrastructure and construction projects in China: From an EIA-based to a whole-cycle process.” Habitat Int. 36 (1): 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.05.006.
Li, W., T. Feng, H. J. Timmermans, Z. Li, M. Zhang, and B. Li. 2020. “Analysis of citizens’ motivation and participation intention in urban planning.” Cities 106: 102921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102921.
Li, W., J. Liu, and D. Li. 2012b. “Getting their voices heard: Three cases of public participation in environmental protection in China.” J. Environ. Manage. 98: 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.12.019.
Liu, D., W. Xu, W. Wang, and S. Sheng. 2013. “Why is Chinese GDP statistics data distorting? An explanation of game equilibrium evolutionary model for political achievement competition.” Inf. Jpn. 16 (6): 3399–3412.
Liu, Z., Z. Zhu, H. Wang, and J. Huang. 2016. “Handling social risks in government-driven mega project: An empirical case study from West China.” Int. J. Project Manage. 34 (2): 202–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.11.003.
Manowong, E., and S. O. Ogunlana. 2006. “Public hearings in Thailand’s infrastructure projects: Effective participations?” Eng., Constr. Archit. Manage. 13 (4): 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980610680162.
Nadeem, O., and T. B. Fischer. 2011. “An evaluation framework for effective public participation in EIA in Pakistan.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 31 (1): 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.01.003.
Ocampo-Melgar, A., L. Sagaris, and J. Gironás. 2019. “Experiences of voluntary early participation in environmental impact assessments in Chilean mining.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 74: 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.09.004.
O’Faircheallaigh, C. 2010. “Public participation and environmental impact assessment: Purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 30 (1): 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.001.
O’Hare, M. 1977. Not on my block you don’t—Facilities siting and the strategic importance of compensation. Public Policy 25 (4): 407–458.
Salomons, G. H., and G. Hoberg. 2014. “Setting boundaries of participation in environmental impact assessment.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 45: 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2013.11.001.
Serrao-Neumann, S., B. Harman, A. Leitch, and D. Low Choy. 2015. “Public engagement and climate adaptation: Insights from three local governments in Australia.” J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 58 (7): 1196–1216. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2014.920306.
Shan, C., and T. Yai. 2011. “Public involvement requirements for infrastructure planning in China.” Habitat Int. 35 (1): 158–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.06.004.
Sinclair, A. J., A. Diduck, and P. Fitzpatrick. 2008. “Conceptualizing learning for sustainability through environmental assessment: Critical reflections on 15 years of research.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 28 (7): 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.11.001.
Smith, J. M., and G. R. Price. 1973. “The logic of animal conflict.” Nature 246 (5427): 15–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/246015a0.
Soltani, A., K. Hewage, B. Reza, and R. Sadiq. 2015. “Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of municipal solid waste management: A review.” Waste Manage. (Oxford) 35: 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.010.
Stratigea, A., and G. Somarakis. 2019. “Guiding informed choices on participation tools in spatial planning: An E-decision support system.” Int. J. E-Plann. Res. 8 (3): 38–61.
Su, Y. 2020. “Multi-agent evolutionary game in the recycling utilization of construction waste.” Sci. Total Environ. 738: 139826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139826.
Sun, L., D. Zhu, and E. H. Chan. 2016. “Public participation impact on environment NIMBY conflict and environmental conflict management: Comparative analysis in Shanghai and Hong Kong.” Land Use Policy 58: 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.07.025.
Sun, Y. 2015. “Facilitating generation of local knowledge using a collaborative initiator: A NIMBY case in Guangzhou, China.” Habitat Int. 46: 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.11.005.
Tesfamariam, D., and B. Lindberg. 2005. “Aggregate analysis of manufacturing systems using system dynamics and ANP.” Comput. Ind. Eng. 49 (1): 98–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2005.05.001.
Tian, C., and C. Han. 2022. “How can China resolve the NIMBY dilemma in a network society? Government and society-negotiated decisions based on evolutionary game analysis.” Sustainability 14 (3): 1308. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031308.
Wang, L., N. Zhao, and D. Liu. 2020. “Complex disaster management: A dynamic game among the government, enterprises, and residents.” J. Cleaner Prod. 266: 122091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122091.
Webler, T., H. Kastenholz, and O. Renn. 1995. “Public participation in impact assessment: A social learning perspective.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 15 (5): 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(95)00043-E.
Wilson, A., and M. Tewdwr-Jones. 2019. “Let’s draw and talk about urban change: Deploying digital technology to encourage citizen participation in urban planning.” Environ. Plann. B: Urban Anal. City Sci. 47 (9): 1588–1604.
Wright, S. A. 1993. “Citizen information levels and grassroots opposition to new hazardous waste sites: Are nimbyists informed?” Waste Manage. (Oxford) 13 (3): 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-053X(93)90049-3.
Xue, M., H. Shen, and J. Zhao. 2018. “Risk factors influencing environmental protest severity in China.” Int. J. Conflict Manage. 29 (2): 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-06-2017-0060.
Yi, G., and G. Yang. 2021. “Research on the tripartite evolutionary game of public participation in the facility location of hazardous materials logistics from the perspective of NIMBY events.” Sustainable CitiesSoc. 72: 103017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103017.
Yu, J., C. Zhang, D. Huang, Y. Shao, and H. Ren. 2021. “Explore the conflict and resolution of pollution NIMBY facility construction in the context of new media: An evolutionary game theoretical approach.” Complexity 2021: 1–19.
Zeng, S. X., H. Y. Ma, H. Lin, R. C. Zeng, and V. Tam. 2015. “Social responsibility of major infrastructure projects in China.” Int. J. Project Manage. 33 (3): 537–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.07.007.
Zhao, T., and Z. Liu. 2019. “A novel analysis of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology adoption: An evolutionary game model between stakeholders.” Energy 189: 116352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116352.
Zhou, L. 2007. “Governing China’s local officials: An analysis of promotion tournament model.” [In Chinese.] Econ. Res. J. (7): 36–50.
Zhou, Y., L. Hou, Y. Yang, H. Chong, and S. Moon. 2019. “A comparative review and framework development on public participation for decision-making in Chinese public projects.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 75: 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.12.006.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 150Issue 1March 2024

History

Received: Nov 4, 2022
Accepted: Sep 25, 2023
Published online: Dec 27, 2023
Published in print: Mar 1, 2024
Discussion open until: May 27, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yuanshu Liang [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing Univ., 83# Shabei St., Shapingba District, Chongqing 400045, China. Email: [email protected]
Yuqing Zhang [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing Univ., 83# Shabei St., Shapingba District, Chongqing 400045, China. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing Univ., 83# Shabei St., Shapingba District, Chongqing 400045, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Research Center for Construction Economics and Management, Chongqing Univ., 83# Shabei St., Shapingba District, Chongqing 400045, China (corresponding author). https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3734-3448. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share