Technical Papers
May 30, 2023

LEED and BREEAM Green Building Certification Systems as Possible Game Changers in Attaining Low-Cost Energy-Efficient Urban Housing Projects

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 149, Issue 3

Abstract

The aim of this research study is to illustrate the role of the Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) and Leadership in Energy and Design (LEED) within low-cost urban housing projects through the analysis of multiple factors and motivations impacting the outcome of construction projects. The rate at which climate change is advancing demands that the construction industry change their practices to decrease the natural resources it consumes as well as improve the environmental efficiency of the world’s building stock. The introduction of BREEAM and LEED in 1990 and 2000, respectively, provided a system where buildings are evaluated on their energy performance. Issues, however, began to develop as research that illustrated the system’s drawbacks undermined its utility. In turn, the role of the green building certifications ought to be researched so that policy and stakeholder communication frameworks can be developed by contractors and designers to ensure the success of BREEAM and LEED projects. The research study was completed through a literature study of prior research as well as by the publishing of a snowball sampling-based survey questionnaire undertaken between practitioners, architects, engineers as well as researchers involved in the UK construction industry. The results of the survey were then collated using IBM’s Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) and then a confirmatory factor analysis as well as a correlation matrix was completed. The confirmatory factor analysis illustrated that the two most important factors were climate change and quality. Thus, contractors and designers ought to develop practical policies and stakeholder frameworks to achieve value for money for the market demographic. The results of this study hold potential to increase the application of BREEAM and LEED. The improvement of practice in low-cost urban housing projects will improve the accessibility of BREEAM and LEED housing projects and, in turn, the energy efficiency and sustainability of new building stock.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

References

Acemoglu, D., P. Aghion, L. Busztyn, and D. Hemous. 2012. “The environment and directed technical change.” Am. Econ. Rev. 102 (1): 131–166. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.1.131.
Ackay, E. C., and D. Arditi. 2017. “Desired points at minimum cost in the Optimise Energy Performance credit of LEED certification.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 23 (6): 796–805. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2017.1319412.
Alawneh, R., F. Ghazali, and M. Asif. 2019. “A new index for assessing the contribution of energy efficiency in LEED 2009 certified green buildings to achieving UN sustainable development goals in Jordan.” Int. J. Green Energy 16 (6): 490–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2019.1584104.
Altomente, S., S. Saadouni, M. G. Kent, and S. Schiavon. 2017. “Satisfaction with indoor environmental quality in BREEAM and non-BREEAM certified office buildings.” Archit. Sci. Rev. 60 (4): 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2017.1336983.
Amiri, A., J. Ottelin, and J. Sorvari. 2019. “Are LEED-certified buildings energy-efficient in practice.” Accessed June 1, 2021. file:///Users/charlottethompson/Downloads/sustainability-11-01672%20(3).pdf.
Apanaviciene, R., K. Maliejus, and P. Fokaides. 2020. “Sustainability assessment of the building construction stage using building sustainability assessment schemes.” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 410 (1): 12064. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/410/1/012064.
BREEAM. 2021a. “BREEAM category issues and aims.” Accessed July 21, 2021. https://www.breeam.com/discover/how-breeam-certification-works/.
Brown, J. D. 2002. “The Cronbach alpha reliability estimate.” Shiken: JALT Test. Eval. SIG Newsl. 6 (1): 17–18.
Bryman, A. 2016. Social research methods. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Callaway, R., T. Dixon, and D. Nikolic. 2019. “Embedding green infrastructure evaluation in neighbourhood masterplans - does BREEAM communities change anything?” J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 62 (14): 2478–2505. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1563371.
Charoenkit, S., and S. Kumar. 2014. “Environmental Sustainability Assessment Tools for low carbon and climate resilient low income housing settlements.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 38: 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.06.012.
Chegut, A., P. Eichholtz, and N. Kok. 2012. Demand and the value of green buidings. London: RICS Research.
Chegut, A., P. Eichholtz, and N. Kok. 2019. “The price of innovation: An analysis of the marginal cost of green buildings.” J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 98: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2019.07.003.
Cole, R. J., and M. J. Valdebenito. 2013. “The importation of building environment certification systems: International usages of BREEAM and LEED.” Build. Res. Inf. 1: 662–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2013.802115.
Dixon, T., G. Ennis-Reynolds, C. Roberts, and S. Sims. 2009. “Is there a demand for sustainable offices? An analysis of UK business occupier moves (2006–2008).” J. Prop. Res. 26 (1): 61–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09599910903290052.
Doan, D. T., A. Ghaffarianhoseini, N. Naismith, T. Zhang, A. Ghaffarianhoseini, and J. Tookey. 2017. “A critical comparison of green building rating systems.” Build. Environ. 123: 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.007.
Forthofer, R., E. Lee, and M. Hernandez. 2007. “Interval estimation.” Biostatistics 1 (1): 169–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-369492-8.50012-1.
Greer, F., J. Chittick, E. Jackson, J. Mack, M. Shortlidge, and E. Grubert. 2019. “Energy and water efficiency in LEED: How well are LEED points linked to climate outcomes?” Energy Build. 195: 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.05.010.
Gurgun, A. P., and D. Arditi. 2018. “Assessment of energy credits in LEED certified buildings on certification levels and project ownership.” Buildings 8 (29): 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8020029.
Hoffman, A., and R. Henn. 2008. “Overcoming the social and psychological barriers to green building.” Organ. Environ. 21: 390–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026608326129.
IBM Docs. 2021. “KMO and Bartlett’s test.” Accessed August 24, 2021.https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/spss-statistics/23.0.0?topic=detection-kmo-bartletts-test.
Liu, T.-Y., P.-H. Chen, and N. N. S. Chou. 2019. “Comparison of assessment systems for green building and green civil infrastructure.” Sustainability 11 (7): 2117. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072117.
Maqbool, R. 2018. “Efficiency and effectiveness of factors affecting renewable energy projects; an empirical perspective.” Energy 158 (1): 944–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.015.
Maqbool, R., and I. E. Amaechi. 2022. “A systematic managerial perspective on the environmentally sustainable construction practices of UK.” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29 (4): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20255-5.
Maqbool, R., X. Deng, and S. Ashfaq. 2020. “A risky output of variation orders in renewable energy projects: Identification, assessment and validation.” Sci. Total Environ. 743: 140811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140811.
Maqbool, R., V. Kandukuri, Y. Rashid, and S. Ashfaq. 2022. “British construction industry: A landmark of environmentally sustainable practices to the world.” Int. J. Global Warming 28 (3): 211–238.
Maqbool, R., and Y. Rashid. 2017. “Detrimental changes and construction projects: Need for comprehensive controls.” Int. J. Project Organ. Manage. 9 (2): 154–170. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPOM.2017.10006017.
Maqbool, R., and H. Wood. 2022. “Containing a sustainable urbanized environment through SuDS devices in management trains.” Sci. Total Environ. 807: 150812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150812.
Maskey, R., J. Fei, and H. Nguyen. 2018. “Use of exploratory factor analysis in maritime research.” Asian J. Ship. Logist. 34 (2): 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2018.06.006.
Mills, B., and J. Schleich. 2012. “Residential energy efficient technology adoption, energy conservation, knowledge and attitudes: An analysis.” Energy Policy 49: 616–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.008.
Ogunbiyi, O., A. Oladapo, and J. Goulding. 2014. “An empirical study of the impact of lean construction techniques on sustainable construction in the UK.” Constr. Innovation 14 (1): 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-08-2012-0045.
Ospina, A. P., A. G. Castano, and L. M. Restrepo. 2016. LEED certification and the new standard of sustainable construction in Colombia. Colombia: SBE Series.
Passila, P., L. Pulkka, and S. Junnila. 2015. “How to succeed in low energy housing path creation analysis of low energy innovation projects.” Sustainability 7: 8801–8822. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7078801.
Pelin, A., and D. Arditi. 2018. “Assessment of energy credits in LEED - certified buildings on certification levels on project ownership.” Buildings 8 (29): 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8020029.
Rastogi, A., J. K. Choi, T. Hong, and M. Lee. 2017. “Impact of different LEED versions for green building certification and energy efficient rating system; A multifamily midrise case study.” Appl. Energy 205: 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.149.
Schweber, L. 2013. “The effect of BREEAM on clients and construction professionals.” Build. Res. Inf. 41 (2): 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2013.768495.
Scofield, J. H., and J. Doane. 2018. “Energy performance of LEED certified buildings from 2015 Chicago benchmarking data.” Energy Build. 174: 402–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.06.019.
Statistics Solutions. 2021. “Factor analysis.” Accessed August 23, 2021. https://www.statisticssolutions.com/free-resources/directory-of-statistical-analyses/factor-analysis/.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 149Issue 3September 2023

History

Received: Aug 3, 2022
Accepted: Mar 20, 2023
Published online: May 30, 2023
Published in print: Sep 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Oct 30, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Rashid Maqbool [email protected]
Faculty of Engineering and Environment, Northumbria Univ., Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Charlotte Thompson [email protected]
Faculty of Engineering and Environment, Northumbria Univ., Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK. Email: [email protected]
Saleha Ashfaq [email protected]
School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou Univ., Fujian 350108, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share