Abstract

Cities around the world are piloting projects to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of shared autonomous vehicles (SAVs), as their large-scale implementation and integration into public transit systems have the potential to improve individuals’ accessibility and transportation equity. To understand the full potential of SAVs and their likely adoption, it is important to identify how the services can be utilized most effectively and what determines the composition of the ridership. This research aims to explore the usage and adoption of SAVs, focusing on a project called RAPID (Rideshare, Automation, and Payment Integration Demonstration) that was launched in Arlington, Texas. We used real-time trip-level ridership data from the SAV platform, conducted a survey of SAV riders, and developed a study based on ordered logistic regression to estimate the determinants of ridership frequency. Data analysis of real-time ridership data revealed that spatial distribution of activities and service accessibility have crucial roles in forming the current users’ travel patterns. The findings from the logistic regression demonstrated that those with higher household incomes are less likely to be frequent riders of RAPID, while those who usually walk, bike, or utilize on-demand ridesharing services are likely to use SAVs often. Users with higher levels of safety perception are also more likely to be frequent users of the service. The findings of this study will provide planners with a better understanding of SAV ridership patterns and will guide decision-makers nationwide in establishing and adopting policies that will be appropriate for future SAV implementation projects.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The work presented herein is a part of the Arlington RAPID (Rideshare, Automation, and Payment Integration Demonstration) project, which is supported by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Integrated Mobility Innovation (IMI) Program funded by the United States Department of Transportation and the City of Arlington, Texas. The RAPID project is a collaboration of different partners, including the City of Arlington, Via, May Mobility, and UTA.

References

Acheampong, R. A., and F. Cugurullo. 2019. “Capturing the behavioural determinants behind the adoption of autonomous vehicles: Conceptual frameworks and measurement models to predict public transport, sharing and ownership trends of self-driving cars.” Transp. Res. Part F Psychol. Behav. 62: 349–375.
Arlington Open Data. 2020. “City of Arlington.” Arlington Open Data. Accessed September 29, 2021. https://opendata.arlingtontx.gov/data sets/arlingtontx::via-rideshare-service-area/abou.
Asgari, H., and X. Jin. 2019. “Incorporating attitudinal factors to examine adoption of and willingness to pay for autonomous vehicles.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2673 (8): 418–429.
Bansal, P., K. M. Kockelman, and A. Singh. 2016. “Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 67: 1–14.
Chee, P. N. E., Y. O. Susilo, and Y. D. Wong. 2020. “Determinants of intention-to-use first-/last-mile automated bus service.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 139: 350–375.
Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R., R. Ketankumar Patel, S. Kermanshachi, J. Michael Rosenberger, D. Weinreich, and A. Foss. 2021. “Integration of shared autonomous vehicles (SAVs) into existing transportation services: A focus group study.” Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 12: 100481.
Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R., R. K. Patel, S. Kermanshachi, J. M. Rosenberger, and A. Foss. 2022. “Modeling users” adoption of shared autonomous vehicles employing actual ridership experiences.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2676 (11): 462–478.
Etzioni, S., R. A. Daziano, E. Ben-Elia, and Y. Shiftan. 2021. “Preferences for shared automated vehicles: A hybrid latent class modeling approach.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 125: 103013.
Fagnant, D. J., and K. M. Kockelman. 2014. “The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 40: 1–13.
Fullerton, A. S. 2009. “A conceptual framework for ordered logistic regression models.” Sociol. Methods Res. 38 (2): 306–347.
Greene, W. H., and D. A. Hensher. 2010. “Modeling ordered choices: A primer.” In Modeling ordered choices: A primer, 99–110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haboucha, C. J., R. Ishaq, and Y. Shiftan. 2017. “User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 78: 37–49.
Harrington, J. 2018. “Travelers take note: These large cities in America offer no public transportation.” USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/experience/america/fifty-states/2018/12/04/americas-largest-cities-with-no-public-transportation/38628503/.
Hulse, L. M., H. Xie, and E. R. Galea. 2018. “Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age.” Saf. Sci. 102: 1–13.
Kassens-Noor, E., Z. Kotval-Karamchandani, and M. Cai. 2020. “Willingness to ride and perceptions of autonomous public transit.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 138: 92–104.
Khan, M. A., R. Etminani-Ghasrodashti, A. Shahmoradi, S. Kermanshachi, J. M. Rosenberger, and A. Foss. 2022. “Integrating shared autonomous vehicles into existing transportation services: Evidence from a paratransit service in Arlington, Texas.” Int. J. Civ. Eng. 20: 601–618.
Kontar, W., S. Ahn, and A. Hicks. 2021. “Autonomous vehicle adoption: Use phase environmental implications.” Environ. Res. Lett. 16 (6): 064010.
Krueger, R., T. H. Rashidi, and J. M. Rose. 2016. “Adoption of shared autonomous vehicles—A hybrid choice modeling approach based on a stated-choice survey.” In Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
Lavieri, P. S., V. M. Garikapati, C. R. Bhat, R. M. Pendyala, S. Astroza, and F. F. Dias. 2017. “Modeling individual preferences for ownership and sharing of autonomous vehicle technologies.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2665 (1): 1–10.
Liljamo, T., H. Liimatainen, and M. Pöllänen. 2018. “Attitudes and concerns on automated vehicles.” Transp. Res. Part F Psychol. Behav. 59: 24–44.
Lu, Z., R. Du, E. Dunham-Jones, H. Park, and J. Crittenden. 2017. “Data-enabled public preferences inform integration of autonomous vehicles with transit-oriented development in Atlanta.” Cities 63: 118–127.
Manson, S., J. Schroeder, D. David Van Riper, T. Tracy Kugler, and S. Ruggles. 2022. IPUMS national historical geographic information system: Version 17.0. Minneapolis: IPUMS.
Nazari, F.-N., M. Noruzoliaee, and A. Mohammadian. 2019. “Adoption of autonomous vehicles with endogenous safety concerns: A recursive bivariate ordered probit model.” In Transportation Research Board 98th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
Patel, R. K., R. Etminani-Ghasrodashti, S. Kermanshachi, J. M. Rosenberger, and A. Foss. 2022. “Mobility-on-demand (MOD) projects: A study of the best practices adopted in United States.” Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 14: 100601.
Sanaullah, I., N. Alsaleh, S. Djavadian, and B. Farooq. 2021. “Spatio-temporal analysis of on-demand transit: A case study of Belleville, Canada.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 145: 284–301.
Shabanpour, R., N. Golshani, A. Shamshiripour, and A. (Kouros) Mohammadian. 2018. “Eliciting preferences for adoption of fully automated vehicles using best-worst analysis.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 93: 463–478.
Song, Y., and D. Noyce. 2019. “Effects of transit signal priority on traffic safety: Interrupted time series analysis of Portland, Oregon, implementations.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 123: 291–302.
Van Lierop, D., and A. El-Geneidy. 2017. “Perceived reality: Understanding the relationship between customer perceptions and operational characteristics.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2652 (1): 87–97.
Wang, K., and G. Akar. 2019. “Factors affecting the adoption of autonomous vehicles for commute trips: An analysis with the 2015 and 2017 puget sound travel surveys.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2673 (2): 13–25.
Yuen, K. F., D. T. K. Huyen, X. Wang, and G. Qi. 2020. “Factors influencing the adoption of shared autonomous vehicles.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17 (13): 4868.
Zhang, T., D. Tao, X. Qu, X. Zhang, R. Lin, and W. Zhang. 2019. “The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 98: 207–220.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 149Issue 1March 2023

History

Received: Nov 17, 2021
Accepted: Sep 20, 2022
Published online: Dec 6, 2022
Published in print: Mar 1, 2023
Discussion open until: May 6, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Muhammad Arif Khan [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Center for Transportation Equity, Decisions and Dollars (CTEDD), Univ. of Texas, Arlington, TX 76019. Email: [email protected]
Center for Transportation Equity, Decisions and Dollars (CTEDD), Univ. of Texas, Arlington, TX 76019. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8434-7663. Email: [email protected]
Sharareh Kermanshachi, Ph.D., F.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Associated Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas, 438 Nedderman Hall, 416 Yates St., Arlington, TX 76019 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Industrial, Manufacturing, and Systems Engineering, Univ. of Texas, Arlington, TX 76019. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4038-1402. Email: [email protected]
Office of Strategic Initiatives, City of Arlington, 101 W. Abram St., Arlington, TX 76010. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9060-0234. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Identifying Impacts of Integration of Autonomous Vehicles into On-Demand Transportation, International Conference on Transportation and Development 2024, 10.1061/9780784485521.048, (532-543), (2024).
  • A Review of Factors Affecting Severity of Autonomous Vehicle Crashes, International Conference on Transportation and Development 2024, 10.1061/9780784485514.066, (755-766), (2024).
  • A Review on Shared Mobility and Electric Vehicles, International Conference on Transportation and Development 2023, 10.1061/9780784484883.029, (333-342), (2023).
  • Identifying individuals’ perceptions, attitudes, preferences, and concerns of shared autonomous vehicles: During- and post-implementation evidence, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 10.1016/j.trip.2023.100785, 18, (100785), (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share