Technical Papers
Apr 30, 2024

Estimating Incident Queue Impacts with and without a Traffic Surveillance System

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 150, Issue 7

Abstract

Despite the needs of assessing the time-varying queue length for incident traffic management, such imperative information has not yet been available in practice, due partly to the lack of reliable sensor data on many highways plagued by nonrecurrent congestion. Hence, this study first presents an incident queue impact assessment system that allows highway agencies to perform reliable estimate of the queue distance during the incident clearance period with available detector data, and then discusses two alternative models for supporting approximating such impacts on roadway networks without traffic sensors. The proposed system’s major model, grounded in the classical shockwave theory, has augmented the formulations for queue propagation dynamics with the impacts from incoming drivers’ perceptions and responses to the progressively constrained traffic conditions. To cope with the lack of real-time traffic flow information, the first alternative model integrates the increasing available speed data from probe vehicles or other sources with lane blockage patterns to approximate the discharge flow rate of the incident. The second alternative model centers on the methodology and calibration methods for constructing a set of speed–flow rate relationships for different times of day with archived traffic data to approximate the arriving flow rate. With such information, responsible agencies can then proceed the approximation of incident queue variation length and take necessary actions. Performance evaluation of the proposed system with both field incident data and simulated scenarios has confirmed its promising properties, especially for highway networks without reliable traffic surveillance systems.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study, such as speed and flow rates, are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend special thanks to Jason Dicembre, Mohammed Raqib, and Hua Xiang for their generous and professional support. The support and suggestions by engineers and other staff from Maryland State Highway Administration’s Office of Policy and Research and Office of Transportation Mobility and Operations are greatly appreciated. Additionally, the authors would like to thank experienced reviewers for their constructive and valuable suggestions for improving the overall quality of this paper.

References

Albanese, M., R. Camus, and G. Longo. 2003. “Capacity and Queue modeling for on-ramp-freeway junctions.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1852 (1): 256–264. https://doi.org/10.3141/1852-31.
Amer, A., E. Roberts, U. Mangar, W. H. Kraft, J. T. Wanat, P. C. Cusolito, J. R. Hogan, and X. Zao. 2015. Traffic incident management gap analysis primer. Washington, DC: FHWA, USDOT.
Ban, X., J. S. Pang, H. X. Liu, and R. Ma. 2012. “Continuous-time point-queue models in dynamic network loading.” Transp. Res. Part B. 46 (3): 360–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2011.11.004.
Cao, J., M. Hadiuzzaman, T. Z. Qiu, and D. Hu. 2015. “Real-time queue estimation model development for uninterrupted freeway flow based on shockwave analysis.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 42 (3): 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2014-0218.
Cao, J., D. Hu, and M. Hadiuzzaman. 2014. “Comparison of queue estimation accuracy by shockwave-based and input-output-based models.” In Proc., 17th Int. IEEE Conf. on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2687–2692. New York: IEEE.
Carlson, R. C., I. Papamichail, M. Papageorgiou, and A. Messmer. 2010. “Optimal mainstream traffic flow control of large-scale motorway networks.” Transp. Res. Part C. 18 (2): 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2009.05.014.
Carson, J. 2010. Best practices in traffic incident management. Wahsington, DC: FHWA, USDOT.
Cassidy, M. J., and R. L. Bertini. 1999. “Some traffic features at freeway bottlenecks.” Transp. Res. Part B. 33 (1): 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(98)00023-X.
CATT Lab. 2023. Regional integrated transportation information system. College Park, MD: CATT Lab.
Cheevarunothai, P., M. Mooney, and Y. Wang. 2007. Statistical and queuing analyses of freeway incidents in Washington State.” In Proc., 2007 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conf. New York: IEEE.
Cheng, Q., Z. Liu, J. Guo, X. Wu, R. Pendyala, B. Belezamo, and X. Zhou. 2022. “Estimating key traffic state parameters through parsimonious spatial queue models.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 137 (Apr): 103596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2022.103596.
Chung, K., J. Rudjanakanoknad, and M. J. Cassidy. 2007. “Relation between traffic density and capacity drop at three freeway bottlenecks.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 41 (1): 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2006.02.011.
Cortes, C., and V. Vapnik. 1995. “Support-vector networks.” Mach. Learn. 20: 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994018.
Day, N. E. 1969. “Estimating the components of a mixture of normal distributions.” Biometrika 56 (3): 463–474. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/56.3.463.
Du, B., S. Chien, J. Lee, and L. Spasovic. 2017. “Predicting freeway work zone delays and costs with a hybrid machine-learning model.” J. Adv. Transp. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6937385.
Elefteriadou, L., R. P. Roess, and W. R. McShane. 1995. “Probabilistic nature of breakdown at freeway merge junctions.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1484 (1): 80–89.
Erera, A. L., T. W. Lawson, and C. F. Daganzo. 1998. “Simple, generalized method for analysis of traffic queue upstream of a bottleneck.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1646 (1): 132–140. https://doi.org/10.3141/1646-16.
Ghosh, B., J. Dauwel, and U. Fastenrath. 2017. “Analysis and prediction of the queue length for non-recurring road incidents.” In Proc., 2017 IEEE Symp. Series on Computational Intelligence. New York: IEEE.
Gipps, P. G. 1985. “A model for the structure of lane-changing decision.” Transp. Res. Part B. 20 (5): 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(86)90012-3.
Grant, G., S. Mitsuru, G. H. Mitchell, S. B. Logan, and L. E. Dennis. 2019. Analysis of performance measures of traffic incident management in Utah. Taylorsville, UT: Utah DOT.
Hadiuzzaman, M., and T. Z. Qiu. 2013. “Cell transmission model based variable speed limit control for freeways.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 40 (1): 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2012-0101.
Hale, D. K., C. Antoniou, M. Brackstone, D. Michalaka, A. T. Moreno, and K. Parikh. 2015. “Optimization-based assisted calibration of traffic simulation models.” Transp. Res. Part C. 55 (Jun): 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.01.018.
Han, K. E., T. L. Friesz, and T. Yao. 2013a. “A partial differential equation formulation of Vickrey’s bottleneck model, Part I: Methodology and theoretical analysis.” Transp. Res. Part B. 49 (Mar): 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2012.10.003.
Han, K. E., T. L. Friesz, and T. Yao. 2013b. “A partial differential equation formulation of Vickrey’s bottleneck model, Part II: Numerical analysis and computation.” Transp. Res. Part B. 49 (Mar): 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2012.10.004.
HCM (Highway Capacity Manual). 2010. Highway capacity manual. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Hegyi, B., De Schutter, and H. Hellendoorn. 2005. “Model predictive control or optimal coordination of ramp metering and variable speed limit.” Transp. Res. Part C. 13 (3): 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2004.08.001.
Huang, Y. L., Y. T. Lin, and G. L. Chang. 2022. “Extending the I-95 rule-based incident duration system with an automated knowledge transferability model.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2676 (8): 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221083292.
Hurdle, V. F., and B. Son. 2001. “Shock wave and cumulative arrival and departure models: Partners without conflict.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1776 (1): 159–166. https://doi.org/10.3141/1776-21.
INRIX. 2023. INRIX 2022 global traffic scoreboard. Kirkland, WA: INRIX.
Jiang, Y. 2001. Estimation of traffic delays and vehicle queues at freeway work zone. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Kerner, B. S. 2002. “Empirical macroscopic features of spatial-temporal traffic patterns at highway bottlenecks.” Phys. Rev. E 65 (4): 046138. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.65.046138.
Kuwahara, M., and T. Akamatsu. 1997. “Decomposition of the reactive dynamic assignments with queues for a many-to-many origin–destination pattern.” Transp. Res. Part B. 31 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(96)00020-3.
Laval, J. A., and L. Leclercq. 2008. “Microscopic modeling of the relaxation phenomenon using a macroscopic lane-changing model.” Transp. Res. Part B. 42 (6): 511–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2007.10.004.
Law, A. M., and W. D. Kelton. 2007. Simulation modeling and analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lawson, T. W., D. J. Lovell, and C. F. Daganzo. 1997. “Using input-output diagram to determine spatial and temporal extents of a queue upstream of a bottleneck.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1572 (1): 140–147. https://doi.org/10.3141/1572-17.
Leclercq, L., F. Marczak, V. L. Knoop, and S. P. Hoogendoorn. 2016. “Capacity drops at merges: Analytical expression for multilane freeways.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2560 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3141/2560-01.
Lee, C., D. A. Noyce, and X. Qin. 2008. “Development of traffic delay assessment tool for short-term closures on urban freeways.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2055 (1): 39–48. https://doi.org/10.3141/2055-05.
Lee, Y., C.-H. Wei, and K.-C. Chao. 2018. “Evaluating the effects of highway traffic accidents in the development of a vehicle accident queue length estimation model.” Int. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. Res. 16 (Jan): 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13177-016-0135-x.
Ma, J., H. Dong, and H. M. Zhang. 2007. “Calibration of microsimulation with heuristic optimization methods.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1999 (1): 208–217. https://doi.org/10.3141/1999-22.
Margiotta, R., R. Dowling, and J. Paracha. 2012. Analysis, modeling, and simulation for traffic incident management applications. Rep. No. Wahsington, DC: FHWA, USDOT.
Messner, A., and M. Papageorgiou. 1990. “METANET: A macroscopic simulation program for motorway networks.” Traffic Eng. Control. 31 (9): 466–470.
Nam, D. H., and D. R. Drew. 1998. “Analyzing freeway traffic under congestion: Traffic dynamics approach.” J. Transp. Eng. 124 (3): 208–212. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1998)124:3(208).
Newell, G. F. 1968a. “Queues with time-dependent arrival rates: I. The transition through saturation.” J. Appl. Probab. 5 (2): 436–451. https://doi.org/10.2307/3212264.
Newell, G. F. 1968b. “Queues with time-dependent arrival rates: II. The maximum queue and the return to equilibrium.” J. Appl. Probab. 5 (3): 579–590. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211923.
Newell, G. F. 1968c. “Queues with time-dependent arrival rates: III. A mild rush hour.” J. Appl. Probab. 5 (3): 591–606. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211924.
Newell, G. F. 1982. Applications of queueing theory. 2nd ed. New York: Chapman and Hall.
Nie, X., and H. Zhang. 2005. “A comparative study of some macroscopic link models used in dynamic traffic assignment.” Networks Spatial Econ. 5 (1): 89–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-005-6663-6.
Persaud, B., S. Yagar, and R. Brownlee. 1998. “Exploration of the breakdown phenomenon in freeway traffic.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1634 (1): 64–69. https://doi.org/10.3141/1634-08.
Praprut, S., B. Kevin, Z. Xiaosi, C. Chi-Leung, Z. Yunlong, and P. Geza. 2009. Evaluating and improving incident management using historical incident data: Case studies at Texas transportation management centers. Rep. No. Austin, TX: Texas DOT.
PTV Group. 2023. VISSIM simulation. Karlsruhe, Germany: PTV Planung Transport Verkehr GmbH.
Pushkin, K., and S. Neveen. 2011. Analysis, modeling and design for traffic incident management systems. Las Vegas: Univ. of Nevada Las Vegas.
Sando, T., P. Alluri, C. Chuang, H. Haule, A. Kitali, R. Lentz, and A. Huq. 2018. Evaluation of incident response improvement for statewide application: Learning from the new regional traffic management center in Jacksonville, Florida. Rep. No. Tallahassee, FL: FloridaDOT.
Sarvi, M., M. Kuwahara, and A. Ceder. 2007. “Observing freeway ramp merging phenomena in congested traffic.” J. Adv. Transp. 41 (2): 145–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.5670410203.
Sheu, J.-B., Y.-H. Chou, and L.-J. Shen. 2001. “A stochastic estimation approach to real-time prediction of incident effects on freeway traffic congestion.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 35 (6): 575–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00011-4.
Spall, J. C. 1998. “An overview of the simultaneous perturbation method for efficient optimization.” John Hopkins APL Tech. Dig. 19 (4): 482–492.
Ullman, G. L., and C. L. Dudek. 2003. “Theoretical approach to predicting traffic queues at short-term work zones on high-volume roadways in urban areas.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1824 (1): 29–36. https://doi.org/10.3141/1824-04.
Vickrey, W. 1969. “Congestion theory and transport investment.” Am. Econ. Rev. 39 (8): 251–260.
Weng, J., and Q. Meng. 2013. “Estimating capacity and traffic delay in work zones: An overview.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 35 (Oct): 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.06.005.
Won, K. 2014. “Development of a traffic incident management system for contending with non-recurrent highway congestion.” In Proc., IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). New York: IEEE.
Yang, G., Z. Tian, H. Xu, and D. Wang. 2016. “Queue length estimation at metered freeway-to-freeway connectors.” J. Adv. Transp. 50 (8): 1912–1924. https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.1436.
Yi, H., and T. Mulinazzi. 2007. “Observed distribution patterns of on-ramp merge lengths on urban freeways.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2023 (1): 120–129. https://doi.org/10.3141/2023-13.
Yuan, K., V. L. Koop, and S. P. Hoogendoorn. 2017. “A microscopic investigation into the capacity drop: Impacts of longitudinal behavior on the queue discharge rate.” Transp. Sci. 51 (3): 852–862. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2017.0745.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 150Issue 7July 2024

History

Received: Aug 8, 2023
Accepted: Feb 1, 2024
Published online: Apr 30, 2024
Published in print: Jul 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Sep 30, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yen-Lin Huang, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Gang-Len Chang, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share